Donald F. Featherstone (1918–2013)

It's a good thing Robin Hood probably couldn't read. He might have some complaints about this book otherwise.

Don't misunderstand that. It's a good read. But the historical weaknesses are pretty evident to anyone who knows much about the Middle Ages. Yes, the longbow was an amazing weapon -- in a way, the world's first terror weapon, because (in the hands of a man trained to it) it was the first long-range weapon with both high accuracy and a high rate of fire. It let the English win great show more battles at Crécy and Agincourt. It made them feared in France and much of Europe.

But the stories about the bow's success can be exaggerated. It made surprisingly little difference in the Wars of the Roses, for instance. And by the time Henry VIII was sending bowmen to invade France, it was an out-of-date weapon -- it was still faster and more accurate than firearms, but any knucklehead could fire a gun; longbows took skill. So the longbow, despite its amazing reputation, was a major weapon for only about a century, and won only a handful of battles.

I won't get into the historical errors in this book; suffice it to say that there are a number of them. It's a fun tale if you like soldier tales, but it it's just not entirely trustworthy. show less

I found this an easy and entertaining book to read. In fact, it was almost "too entertaining".
Mr. Featherstone does a good job of relating the historical developement and emergence of England's pride of martial prowess, but one big problem I have with it is the quoting of Sir Conan Doyle's "The White Company" which is, in fact, a piece of fiction. It is well based on history and research, but quoting fiction sources in a "military history" piece is a big no-no in my eyes.
One thing I really show more did like is Mr. Featherstone keeps away from all the socio-economic-geopolitical machinations of the times that lead to these battles. He gets right down to the nitty-gritty much like a fighting man would do himself.
A novice on medieval warfare would love this book and it would serve to inspire many to more research. The "wizened" vet on the subject is bombarded by the same anecdotes, stories, and quotes that he has read a hundred times before. But I found if far from tiresome and sort of comfortable actually. Overall, a good book. show less

"Donald Featherstone's War Games: Battles and manoeuvres with model soldiers."

The Duke of Wellington once said, when asked how he had beaten the French, said that the two military machines were like teams of horses all pulling towards a common goal. The differance he said was that the French made their plans out of harness and therefore were helpless when the harness holding any particular horse broke. He on the other hand, made his plans out of rope, so that when a part of the team broke show more loose, he could simply tie the two ends of the rope together and carry on.

This is a book contains a great deal of rope from which any wargamer worth his salt will be able to fashion any amount of harness.

Physically, what you get for your money is a slim perfect bound paperback of 156 pages, with a glossy colour cover and illustrated within with black and white. The print quality is about standard for a print on demand publisher like Lulu, so that while the text is perfectly readable, some of the black and white photographs are a little muddy.

In these 150 odd pages, the author offers a short description of the history of wargaming, a discussion of model soldiers and where to get them, including some advice on how to cast your own using plumbing lead, organising a campaigan, creating terrain and three sets of wargames rules covering ancient warfare, the horse and musket era and moderns (in this context the Second World War).

All this will be very old hat to the experienced wargamer, but the beginner looking for a book to start off with, this is an embarrassment of riches.

Take the Horse and Musket section for example, compromise only eight pages and are very simple. There are no complicated command rules here and the sections on melee combat and morale simply refer back to the Ancients set of rules decscribed in the previous chapter. They are however, surprisingly playable and accompanied by "Action in the Plattville Valley", a blow by blow account of a small engagement as played through by the author. The account has worked examples of several key parts of the rules, morale, fire and melee combat.

I often wonder when I read accounts of war game battles, whether the game described actually occurred, not so with "Action in the Plattville Valley". It is neither neat or simple and there is a definate ring of truth about it. The same goes for the rest of the book, which is full of sentences like this; "Wargamers Warwick Hale and Peter Pringle of Chatham have worked out a simple, but highly effective means of reproducing hidden troop movements..." or "It must be confessed that the question of how to fight a successful action with natives against disciplined troops has yet to be completely solved by the writer." All the suggestions, the advice and the rules in this volume are the result of years of experience on model battlefields, straight forward and firmly grounded in what is possible.

This is all good and useful stuff, but what really distinguishes "Wargames" from other books of the sort and which makes it attractive to the elder gamer who knows his way around campaigns and terrain construction and all the rest of it, is the sheer breathless enthusiasm of the piece. I challenge any gamer to read Donald Featherstone's description of Lionel Tarr's Second World War game, his musings on table sizes or his thoughts on the fun of campaigning without feeling the itch to get back into the game.

"Wargames" is a book of suggestions, advice and inspiration. There are three workable sets of rules in it, but as the author says in his introduction there are about as many rule sets as there are wargamers and the only person you have to please is yourself. I really don't think Donald Featherstone cares if you play Ancients or Moderns or Napoleonics or what ruleset you play, so long as you enjoy your game and it's that healthy and inspiring attitude to the hobby that struck me again and again. Featherstone's love for war gaming oozes from every page. show less

This is a flat rendition of the history of the First Sikh War of British India. Don Featherstone is more famous as a creator of Table-top wargaming rules, so I thought I'd try his other prose. It's competent, but not exciting.