Victor Pemberton (1931–2017)
Author of Doctor Who: Fury from the Deep
About the Author
Works by Victor Pemberton
Associated Works
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Legal name
- Pemberton, Victor Francis
- Birthdate
- 1931-10-10
- Date of death
- 2017-08-13
- Gender
- male
- Nationality
- UK
- Birthplace
- Islington, London, England, UK
- Place of death
- Spain
- Associated Place (for map)
- England, UK
Members
Reviews
http://nhw.livejournal.com/1046178.html#cutid6
On the one hand, it scores over the audio version on which it is based by having a larger number of active characters and a wider view of the action. On the other hand, Pemberton's writing style is absolutely dire, with a cringeworthy phrase on almost every page. In addition, he seems unsure which Doctor he is writing for, with the appearance of a flute (ie recorder) at the end, and a confusion about whether we are in the 1960s or 1970s. Not show more quite the worst novelisation or spinoff fiction I've read, but really one for completists only. show less
On the one hand, it scores over the audio version on which it is based by having a larger number of active characters and a wider view of the action. On the other hand, Pemberton's writing style is absolutely dire, with a cringeworthy phrase on almost every page. In addition, he seems unsure which Doctor he is writing for, with the appearance of a flute (ie recorder) at the end, and a confusion about whether we are in the 1960s or 1970s. Not show more quite the worst novelisation or spinoff fiction I've read, but really one for completists only. show less
http://nhw.livejournal.com/982106.html
I admit I found the original story a bit lacking; since then, however, I've seen the few surviving clips on the "Lost In Time" DVD and it really does look much better than it sounded. Also, in the context of a Doctor Who which was moving more to contemporary England as a setting, it makes more sense; it is a successful (and maybe in some ways better) prototype for some of the Pertwee stories. (Drilling-awakes-ancient-enemy of course goes back to show more Lovecraft and before, but reappears in Who in Inferno and The Power of Kroll at least.)
Anyway, the book is OK, and as you can see has prompted me to re-evaluate the original story, but it is not a great work of literature. As with too many of the Target novelisations, it is mostly narrated as if the author were simply writing down what is visible on the TV screen, and Pemberton's occasional excursions into tight third are actually jarring and often unsuccessful. The Doctor and companions get apparently killed so often that it loses dramatic impact (and this occasionally calls forth thunderously bad prose, citing for instance pp 129-130). On the other hand, the book does make more sense than the original story and fills in some of the plot gaps and backgrounds to the characters, and Victoria's decision to depart is decently foreshadowed. And the monster, as so often, is more convincing on the printed page. So I don't regret buying it. show less
I admit I found the original story a bit lacking; since then, however, I've seen the few surviving clips on the "Lost In Time" DVD and it really does look much better than it sounded. Also, in the context of a Doctor Who which was moving more to contemporary England as a setting, it makes more sense; it is a successful (and maybe in some ways better) prototype for some of the Pertwee stories. (Drilling-awakes-ancient-enemy of course goes back to show more Lovecraft and before, but reappears in Who in Inferno and The Power of Kroll at least.)
Anyway, the book is OK, and as you can see has prompted me to re-evaluate the original story, but it is not a great work of literature. As with too many of the Target novelisations, it is mostly narrated as if the author were simply writing down what is visible on the TV screen, and Pemberton's occasional excursions into tight third are actually jarring and often unsuccessful. The Doctor and companions get apparently killed so often that it loses dramatic impact (and this occasionally calls forth thunderously bad prose, citing for instance pp 129-130). On the other hand, the book does make more sense than the original story and fills in some of the plot gaps and backgrounds to the characters, and Victoria's decision to depart is decently foreshadowed. And the monster, as so often, is more convincing on the printed page. So I don't regret buying it. show less
A bit of light reading. Cheap production. Fairly weak plot. Typical Dr Who
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 24
- Also by
- 1
- Members
- 479
- Popularity
- #51,491
- Rating
- 3.0
- Reviews
- 6
- ISBNs
- 82















