John A. Keel (1930–2009)

John Keel follows that rather dangerous path of conspiracy theorists - calling out and explaining the shenanigans and trickery of the fakers, explaining the logical explanation behind things incorrectly attributed to paranormal activity and even a few self-deprecating stories involving himself all designed to explain why he MUST be telling you the truth about the theories he's about to explain. Of course, it doesn't help that establishing all that doubt upfront taints everything he says.

One show more has to give Keel credit. When he tells his story, he is convinced of his facts. At one point, he claims that American Indians refused to inhabit West Virginia and that a map he used identified West Virginia as "uninhabited." Yet West Virginia shows as being formally inhabited by the Shawnee, Cherokee, Tutelo and Saponi tribes with tribe descendants being relocated to Kansas and Oklahoma to reservations during the Indian removals of the 1800s. See how easy it is to twist history to fit your conspiracy? This is what the whole book feels like - Keel debunks other's facts and then clings to his own. He admits that his witnesses are unreliable, but wants to show that this is why they must be telling the truth. It's a confusing non-logic square wheel of truth or something...

It's a compelling myth that appeals to a lot of people - after all, we wouldn't have all of these shows on cable television devoted to the hunting of monsters, ghosts, aliens and the uncovering of conspiracies if it wasn't, would we? But I guess I'm just wondering when all the technology we have and all the individuals willing to be open to this thing - even Stephen Hawking is open to alien life! - why we're still stuck in the world of the fringe, the vague, the blurry and having to look at things in some sort of 3D-hidden-picture filter to get at the truth? After 40 years, shouldn't John Keel's Mothman epilogue had been about more than getting a movie made? show less

Not really sure what I expected with this one. My daughter and I had become entertained by the idea of West Virginia's "Mothman" (neither of us is a believer in such things, but we really enjoy these kind of tales) and so I thought I would go as close to the "source" as I could on this one and read a book by a man who was in Point Pleasant, West Virginia around the time of many of the Mothman sightings. I was also intrigued because this is thought of in some quarters as a seminal work in the show more field. One of those foundational "paranormal" books that birthed a thousand more. Keel, in fact, is credited with coining the term "Men in Black," and talks at length about them in this book.

The book is really well-written on a literature level--Keel knows how to write good sentences and paragraphs. What he's less adept at--or doesn't even attempt--is to write a thorough narrative with a beginning, middle, and end. Worked in among his tales of his visits to Point Pleasant are all the OTHER weird things he took note of happening toward the end of the 1960s, both in the United States and around the world. What's left is a real jumble of events that don't really seem to add up to anything--or at least nothing that Keel even attempts to put together.

As another review here on LT said, he considered himself a Fortean, and Forteans are apparently less concerned with explanations as with documentation. In that regard, it's a fascinating book filled with collected documents--for as much as you can believe any of them. As noted before, he recounts MANY stories of "Men in Black" following up on UFO and cryptid sightings...but never once tries to explain (or even guess) who they really are and why they are here. There are plenty of times he tells us what they AREN'T (real officers from the US Air Force, for example), but not once does he even suggest who or what they might really be--other than a menace.

What's more mysterious to me is that I could never tell what side of the fence Keel really fell on. In one breath, he will talk about how you can definitely, without a doubt, tell someone's experience with a UFO is real because of the effect on their eyes and skin (the "actinic rays" cause mild sunburn and red, swollen eyes...). Then, in the next breath, he will refute the account of an alien visitation by another "contactee." How he deems one story to be legit and the next to be hokum is never truly explained. Is his doubt of SOME stories supposed to prove his belief in the others is scientific and genuine? But then, later, he expresses his disbelief in the idea that the universe is filled with habitable planets and alien life--just about the one thing modern science HAS put its faith in among all the other wild claims he makes in the book!

And his descriptions of the "Mothman" of West Virginia--at times, the evidence in the BOOK seems pretty clear that it was nothing supernatural, but instead a large bird (some people suggest a wayward Sandhill Crane, or something similar) or a flock of birds that surprised and scared a small mountain town not used to seeing such creatures. In the last chapter he even refers to the "Mothman" as a large bird, as though that's what he believes it is--yet he also presents the accounts of those who saw the mythical "Mothman" as though they saw something genuinely chthonic.

At one point early on, Keel proposes the idea that all of these strange phenomena--West Virginia's Mothman, UFOs, spacemen, ancient visitations from angels and demons--are not EXTRAterrestrial, but instead ULTRAterrestrial, a term he defines along the lines of energy from outside of space and time that manifests itself in the form of whatever things people of the contemporary era are able to interpret as. So ancients see angels, and we modern folks in the space race era saw spaceships and aliens. It's an interesting idea, and definitely not your run-of-the-mill explanation of UFOs and cryptids...but it's as unsubstantiated as the rest of it. So while the book might make an interesting film or an episode of the X-Files, as a treatise on Mothman, or UFOs, or ultraterrestrials, or anything else he presents here, "The Mothman Prophecies" ultimately reads like the rambling notes of a man who spent his adult life writing down every strange story he heard. show less

When writing the Mothman prophecies, John Keel was definitely scared and he handled the fear with anger and contempt for the 'enemy'. This contempt colors the text with an arrogance toward all who are against him - including various UFO investigators. Some readers will find this provoking - I found it refreshing and understandable as I devoured this creepy, entertaining and very interesting book. Let us look at these two aspects of this story:

Entertainment

The Mothman Prophecies is excellent show more thrilling entertainment. I found the movie (2002) scarier than the book, but it's still creepy enough, and it's slowly dragging you into a world where consensus reality is gradually replaced by a grim place where we all can become victims to the forces who act behind the guise of the UFO phenomena (according to Keels hypothesis) and be dragged into a nightmare world. The story covers the thirteen months (1966-67) of UFO activity and monster sightings (mainly the Mothman) leading up to the collapse of the Silver Bridge in Point Pleasant. Keel investigates the UFOs and the Mothman and his only weapons are his intelligence and sarcasm. As he reports the weird events he connects them to similar weirdness in ancient as well as then recent history. Keel builds an hypothesis of what's really going on while giving you even more paranormal events to process. Depending on how sensitive you are, this book could make it a bit hard to fall asleep.

Keel's hypothesis

The world seems to be a place not so far from H.P. Lovecraft's Cthulhu Mythos universe. It's a cold and uncaring universe, but instead of the menace of the Great Old Ones, mankind has been harassed since its beginnings by a malevolent force that has in different guises toyed with humanity. The guise seems to be determined by the age and culture the human interacting with these forces belong to. Once they were little people or dragons, since the late 1940s they have appeared as UFOs, aliens, and of course the Mothman. More specifically, Keel labels the winged creatures 'the Garudas' (after Hindu legends I believe) and tells us they're associated with 'luminous phenomena'. He also connects them and the other manifestations to occult phenomena.

Other interesting findings are Keel's observation (based on UFO reports) that you're likelier to see a UFO on an Wednesday at 10 P.M. Alarmingly, children between ages of seven to eighteen are likelier to witness paranormal activity and that the events are often concentrated around schools. Also a majority of those who find their car chased by UFOs or winged horrors are said to be schoolteachers. Especially dangerous is being a teacher of abnormal children - bright or mentally deficient. One can only speculate what the reason for this could be.

It's refreshing that Keel is convinced that USAF and other government agencies are not guilty of being in an unholy alliance with the UFO-entities, nor are their agents the creepy Men in Black (term coined by Keel). The government seems as confused as the rest of the investigators.

I recommend the Mothman Prophecies to all readers who are interested in the UFO phenomena, the paranormal in general, or just want to to read an entertaining creepy story. It's a quick read if you like the subject, but as said before, beware if you're the sensitive type. This stuff gets under your skin to an extent. show less

Oh wow. Um, yeah. So, this book starts out pretty well; it's about a series of sightings in and around Point Pleasant, WV of "The Mothman," a strange creature with a manlike body, enormous glowing red eyes, and wings. I find this kind of thing fascinating in a folklore/sociological kind of way, so I like to read about such sightings. Like I said, this starts out pretty well. Keel is a witty storyteller and draws a lot of interesting parallels between the Mothman and other sightings show more throughout history of giant birds, dragons, etc. Then things start to get really weird. Keel believes that all of these sightings (Bigfoot, UFOs, sea monsters) are connected -- they're actually beings from another dimension that are intruding onto ours. Okayyyy... Believe it or not, this is not where I really started to lose track of him. It was when he starts in about how the alien creatures from another dimension are toying with him, tapping his phone, impersonating him in the field, and so on that I really just lost patience. The writing gets worse and more confusing and convoluted, and Keel basically comes off like a paranoid schizophrenic. I really wanted to know if there was any truth to his claims about all the weird things happening to him, but there's really no way of knowing. show less