Kim Riddlebarger

Let me first say that I'm writing this from the perspective of a former Dispensationlist that was bible college-trained in that theology.
Kim Riddlebarger makes a really good case for Amillenialism while not mischaracterising other positions, so it's nice to read a work that doesn't construct straw men. Rather, reading R.B.'s explanations of Amillienialism and critiques of other positioins. I appreciate the fact that he recognizes that Dispensationalists are serious about interpretation, but show more just don't recognized the genre of apocalyptic which leads them to some strange places in the name of "literal interpretation." show less

A Case for Amillennialism is a thoughtful, pastoral, and most importantly, scriptural discussion of the various Christian perspectives on the "end times", a discussion that author Kim Riddlebarger firmly believes ends with Amillennialism as the logical outcome. He divides in four parts, beginning with the basics of understanding the terms and the basic theological positions. Second is a comprehensive look at the biblical and theological concerns. Third is an in-depth analysis of the critical show more biblical texts, i.e. Daniel's prophecy of 70 weeks, the Olivet discourse, Romans 11, and Revelation 20. He concludes with a discussion of end-times signs and the proper Christian perspective of them, and some final comments on the various problems associated with each "end times" viewpoint.

When I was in seminary "end times" was not a topic we delved very deeply into. Like Riddlebarger, I am within the Reformed tradition, and I loosely felt myself to be Amillennial, although without having a very clear understanding of what that meant. Reading this book has given me a firm place to stand regarding amillennialism, particularly in regard to the principal contrasting view, dispensationalism. I had felt there were significant holes in the dispensational system and I now have a greater understanding of what they are and how amillennialism answers them. And better than that, I feel more equipped as a pastor in discussing "end times" with members of my congregation and pointing them towards the blessed hope of the return of Christ. show less

I have just (2026) returned to this book. I tried to read it with care, but as the argument is not constructed with care and is far from convincing, I found it impossible to read rather than skim. The book contains a little bit of information about the views of various historical figures, but it seems to me to have no explanatory value.

I listen to Kim on White Horse Inn all the time and find him to be very clear in the vocal expression of his theology. The written expression - not so much. This book did strike some chords with me, but sometimes he is unclear of where he is going (although he must have recognized this because of the wrap-up chapter at the end). As far as the theology itself (Amillienialism), I am definitely going to explore it further.