Picture of author.

About the Author

Disambiguation Notice:

Constantin François de Chassebœuf, comte de Volney.

Works by C. F. Volney

Oeuvres (1990) 7 copies, 2 reviews
Les ruines (1979) 1 copy

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Canonical name
Volney, C. F.
Legal name
de Chassebœuf, Constantin François
Other names
de Chasseboeuf, Constantin François
de Volney, Comte
Volney, Count
Birthdate
1757-02-03
Date of death
1820-04-25
Gender
male
Occupations
writer
traveler
politician
academic
Organizations
1st French National Assembly
The Asiatic Society
Celtic Academy
Awards and honors
Legion of Honor, Founder of the Volney Prize in Linguistics
Académie Française
American Philosophical Society (1797)
Short biography
Constantin-Francois Volney is one of those historical personalities once famous in their own day but now largely forgotten. You’ve heard of people he knew, as well as the events he participated in, but you’ve never heard of the man himself.

Ever hear of Benjamin Franklin? Franklin, then Ambassador to Paris, mentored a young Volney in the years prior to the French Revolution and later introduced him to his successor, Thomas Jefferson.

Ever hear of the Estates General and the Tennis Court Oath? Volney took part in both events and later sat on the committee that wrote the first French constitution.

Ever hear of Napoleon Bonaparte? Volney discovered a young Bonaparte on the island of Corsica and helped his career on numerous occasions, including the 18 Brumaire coup that brought Bonaparte to power. Ever hear of the proclamation of the Empire when Bonaparte crowned himself Emperor? Volney was one of only three senators to vote against that counter-revolutionary bill.

Ever hear of the Alien Act in the United States? Volney, the most famous alien in the U.S. at that time, was forced to leave the country just before the new law went into effect.

Ever hear of an ideologue? Volney was one of the original Ideologues. The Ideologues supported constitutional government, separation of church and state, Adam Smith’s economic principles, abolition of slavery and universal suffrage. They were also correspondents with—again that famous name—Thomas Jefferson.

But those are all good things. So why is there a pejorative attached to the word ideologue today?

It’s because the Ideologues opposed Bonaparte’s dynastic designs. As a result Bonaparte started using the word almost as a curse and, a generation later, Karl Marx—recognizing the theories the Ideologues espoused refuted his own theories—picked up Bonaparte’s pejorative and spread it around the world.

Ever hear of Volney’s Ruins of Empires? Uh, well, no, you probably haven’t. But the book (“Les Ruines” in French) was once world famous—or infamous depending on your point of view.

You’ve heard of Thomas Jefferson of course. But I’ll bet you didn’t know Jefferson liked the book so much he secretly translated it into English. Ever hear of Abraham Lincoln? Lincoln read Volney’s Ruins as a young man and was deeply affected by it. Ever hear of Walt Whitman? Whitman’s most famous poem, Leaves of Grass, was directly inspired by Volney’s Ruins. Ever hear of Thomas Cole, founder of the Hudson River Valley School? His famous paintings—The Voyage of Life and Course of Empire series—were also directly inspired by Volney’s Ruins.

So why are both Volney and his book largely forgotten today? There are many reasons. But first and foremost it’s because he challenges the fundamental principles of both the Left and the Right.

The Left doesn’t like Volney because Ruins of Empires was written as a direct refutation of Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s Social Contract. If you refute the Social Contract, then you refute Socialism and all the various “social models” in Europe (and elsewhere) built upon it. Volney, therefore, has few if any friends among the left-leaning professorial class—the ones who are supposed to teach “enlightenment” to students.

The Right doesn’t like Volney because Ruins of Empires presents a solution to the world’s enduring religious conflicts. While that’s certainly a good thing—and particularly so in a post-September 11 world—the Right still considers Volney to be a heretic and an atheist. Why? Because Ruins of Empires argues for a universal code of morality based on the physical laws of nature. While that sounds innocuous, it implicitly calls into question all other codes of morality based on the existence of some invisible being no one has ever seen—i.e. “God.”

In sum, Volney has been forgotten because neither the academic left nor the religious right has an interest in seeing his memory or his works brought to light—Volney has fallen into an Orwellian “memory hole.” But Thomas Jefferson obviously saw some kind of value in his book. So much value, indeed, that he took the time to translate it into English.

That’s quite a recommendation. And given the state the world’s in today, perhaps it’s time to give Volney and his Ruins of Empires a second chance—and a second reading.

References: Gilbert Chinard, “Volney et l’Amerique,” Baltimore (1923); Jean Gaulmier, “L’Ideologue Volney,” Beirut (1959) and Geneva (1980).
Nationality
France
Birthplace
Craon, Anjou, France
Place of death
Paris, France
Burial location
Cimetière du Père-Lachaise, Paris, France
Disambiguation notice
Constantin François de Chassebœuf, comte de Volney.
Associated Place (for map)
Paris, France

Members

Discussions

Reviews

43 reviews
I could write a book as long about how awesome this book is. Only pissed that no one shoved it in my paws at 15 instead of finding it by chance up in King Library at 35. A book that I sincerely wish all residents of purportedly democratic western societies were MADE to read, as young as intellectually possible. It gives me the same thrill now that Morning of the Magicians gave me at 20 and Cosmic Trigger at 30: the thrill of having found a voice that both has the scholarship (and in Volney's show more case the damned language chops, having learned Arabic as his contemporaries firmly refused to) and the ETHICS to pull off that kind of work of history, intending for the audience to better itself in reading. I'm happy that I otherwise learned so much of the stuff he found in the 780s by myself, and that made the book a fun treasure hunt, but if only I'd known sooner. May we all be as sharp as Volney in everything we consider. NOTICE I read the Black Classics reprint, which is clean and elegant, not the 2018 facsimile. show less
Hail, solitary ruins! holy sepulchres, and silent walls! you I invoke; to you I address my prayer. While your aspect averts, with secret terror, the vulgar regard, it excites in my heart the charm of delicious sentiments--sublime contemplations. What useful lessons! what affecting and profound reflections you suggest to him who knows how to consult you.

When the whole earth, in chains and silence, bowed the neck before its tyrants, you had already proclaimed the truths which they abhor, and show more confounding the dust of the king with that of the meanest slave, had announced to man the sacred dogma of Equality! Within your pale, in solitary adoration of Liberty, I saw her Genius arise from the mansions of the dead; not such as she is painted by the impassioned multitude, armed with fire and sword, but under the august aspect of justice, poising in her hand the sacred balance, wherein are weighed the actions of men at the gates of eternity.

O Tombs! what virtues are yours! you appal the tyrant's heart, and poison with secret alarm his impious joys; he flies, with coward step, your incorruptible aspect, and erects afar his throne of insolence.
show less
This book was intended as the first volume in a two-volume series on the United States. Volney believed that moral and cultural norms arose from a nation's physical circumstances. Physical characteristics such as climate, soil, natural resources, etc, give rise to a nation's laws and customs. For instance, Bedoin nomads living in the deserts of North Africa would develop a different set of moral codes than Germanic tribes living in the forests of Europe--in a word, physical circumstances show more generate cultural norms.

Hence, "Soil and Climate" was to be followed by a second volume describing the country's political, cultural and economic systems--a kind of pre-Tocqueville version of Democracy in America. However on his return to Paris, Volney got sick (probably a result of a fever he acquired during his visits to the Nile and Ohio rivers) and never finished the second volume. (NOTE: For you Tocqueville fans out there, look up references to Volney and this book in the index of "Democracy in America." )

While many of Volney's observations on weather and soil are now outdated, the Appendix remains of great interest: here Volney describes the unfortunate circumstances of French settlers in the Ohio valley who got scammed in the so-called Scioto scheme. Note also in his description of Post-Vincennes on the Wabash that Volney proposes a General Principle which explains why France lost the war for North America: "French colonists talk too much among themselves ("causer") while their Anglo-Saxon competitors work in the fields." According to E. Wilson Lyon, these notes on the situation of the French cultured colonists in North America were presented to Napoleon Bonaparte as evidence he should sell Louisiana Territory to Thomas Jefferson. Also see Barbe-Marbois' famous book on the Louisiana Purchase entitled "History of Louisiana." In the chapter entitled "Cession of Louisiana by France to the United States," Barbe-Marbois repeats Volney's analysis of the French vs. Anglo-Saxon colonists almost word for word--just another (unrecognized) example of Volney's influence on Napoleon Bonaparte and that great land deal Americans call The Louisiana Purchase.

The Appendix also includes a general description of Native Americans in the Ohio Valley which is not exactly flattering. Volney always wrote what he saw, accurately and without passion or sentimentalism (read Chateaubriand). He did consider living among them to get a better, more balanced reading but was warned against undertaking that project. More generally, Volney's less than politically correct description of "the savages" has another object. I have written elsewhere that Volney's Ruins of Empires represents a refutation of the theories of J.J. Rousseau. One of Rousseau's most pernicious theories was the notion that "the Savage Man is more moral than the Civilized Man." From Volney's viewpoint, this description of Native Americans in the Ohio Valley is evidence that Rousseau was wrong. (Yes, I did use the word 'pernicious.' Check out the Disney cartoon-film "Spirit" to see but one example of this pernicious theory at work in our society today.)

For you linguists out there, Volney also includes in the Appendix a "Vocabulary of the Miama language." For you non-linguists out there, note that upon his death Volney established an annual "prize" for research in linguistics. Today, this prize is the equivalent of the Nobel Prize in the field. It is still awarded annually by the Institute in Paris where Volney worked during the Bonaparte years.

Final Note: this English-language translation of "Soil and Climate" was published in a single volume in London in 1804. The original French edition was published in Paris in 1803 in two volumes.
show less
This is the original edition, published in August 1791. Volney was a member of the original National Assembly and sat on the committee that wrote the very first French constitution. He was allied with Mirabeau, but lost influence following the latter's untimely death. France's first constitution was published one month after this edition was published. That means Volney was writing the final chapters of The Ruins at the same time he was participating in the writing of France's first show more constitution---in effect, in one book he was writing political "theory" and in the other was writing political "reality"...Volney's contribution to the French Revolution has been studiously ignored by French historians---could it be because his works refute J.J. Rousseau and the French Social Model which modern day educators in France are always marching in the streets to protect? Nah, couldn't be that...

If you can find a copy in good condition selling for less than $1000, snap it up! It sells for at least that in most Paris bookshops.

Note also the title page should describe Volney as: "Député à l'Assemblée Nationale de 1789."
show less

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
43
Members
299
Popularity
#78,482
Rating
½ 4.4
Reviews
42
ISBNs
54
Languages
3
Favorited
2

Charts & Graphs