Arete's Upcoming Publications

Just received the newsletter from Arete Editions.
Looks like they will be doing The Curious Case of Benjamin Button as well as Lud in the Mist and A Brave New World.

>1 Praveenna_Nagaratnam: whoops, that was an email earlier draft that went out accidentally, we took out Benjamin Button, because although we are talking to Dave McKean, nothing was confirmed, so we took it out and added other stuff about the cases and stuff.

>2 marceloanciano: Glad I saw this since I missed that second email - every new detail about Frozen Hell is more and more exciting! I'm hoping that I can get my hands on whichever state that fantastic looking solander belongs to ...

I just hope there's a fine edition again this time so I can afford it haha

>4 SolerSystem: I was just wondering that too!

Marcelo, are you able to say if there will be a ‘Fine’ edition of Frozen Hell?

>5 GardenOfForkingPaths: Really haven't worked out whether it would be possible to do a 'fine' edition yet, it's because of the paintings, some of them are so large and long that it would mean either cutting the image down so we could print on a two page spread or redesigning the book so they were tipped in, which would make it so expensive with as many painting as we have. And, although we make very little money on the 'fine' editions, they still come out pretty expensive and a lot of buyers don't know the cost of metal letterpress printing so think we are taking them for a ride, which is just not the case. So to add the cost of tipped in ....

Also, I'm sure you other publishers are finding, paper, leather, boards and shipping is becoming REALLY expensive, so trying to keep a book to under a price range is proving...tricky.

>6 marceloanciano: Thanks! I appreciate the insight into the process and all the considerations involved. Looking forward to following the updates in the coming months.

>7 GardenOfForkingPaths: Thanks! Having said that I have always liked the idea that we have books in the store that people can buy when they want, and can afford them, instead of when we put them up for sale.

>3 NathanOv: Nathan, yeah! The solander box will be a split bradel binding and looks stunning! It will be part of the 'lettered' or 'Roman numeral' edition, only thirty or so to make... and the cover of the book inside and the interior of the box, well, can't wait to show what we are playing with, and Rich is really playing with some great ideas.

>1 Praveenna_Nagaratnam: I didn't receive the newsletter, but have signed up for those going forward. Were there any production updates on Death and Honey?

>10 mholt: "Ludlow Bookbinders are hard at work on our three editions of The Case of Death and Honey. We had hoped that they would be finished by the end of this month but it is a large and complex job and is taking longer than expected. We now plan to start shipping at the end of April or the beginning of May."

>11 NathanOv: Perfect. Thanks!

The email announcement for Frozen Hell is out today. Two editions, both of which look fantastic. Pre-order will be coming soon. Not sure how much is intended for the public, so this post is deliberately terse.

>13 Shadekeep: Still out of reach for most, but I expected that Roman Edition to be running $4k+ with all the recent news.

I'm thrilled to hear that the numbered has the lay-flat illustrations, though. That is the most interesting element of this project, IMO.

Oh my. Love that "thing" on the slipcase.

I'm already onboard for a "The Devil in the 19th Century" Demonic Collection copy for that Kickstarter which ends the following week so I'm too tapped to go for this one but it is very, very pretty.

>13 Shadekeep: Thanks for being discrete, and thanks for the compliment! It was two years in the making. The info in the email will all be going out in a day or so on the blog and social media anyway, just wanted the collectors on the email list to have first look is all. Feel free to reveal what you like!

>16 marceloanciano:
Looks absolutely fantastic. ❤️‍🔥❤️🤗
I ordered my Credit Card today and hope it will arrive ASAP, this is an instant buy for me , if it won't sell out in days or hours.. Panic 🥶😶‍🌫️

>16 marceloanciano: Thanks, and I'm going to try to budget for one of the Numbered Editions. As much as I'd love a Roman Edition, I've other book expenses going on (he says cryptically).

Curious to see and feel the Liber Charta paper, I don't believe I have a book made with that yet. It sounds lovely.

>16 marceloanciano: I have followed your updates on this beautiful book, and I think it looks fantastic! I was lucky enough to get the Numbered Edition of The Case of Death and Honey, so I will definitely try to get the Numbered Edition of Frozen Hell as well... 😊

>16 marceloanciano: I really enjoyed the videos showing these two editions being bound. Incredible design, craftsmanship, and attention to detail.

The Roman Edition looks hugely impressive. Completely out of my league but amazing to behold! I don't understand how the leather doesn't get creased and puckered when it's being moulded like that.

>20 GardenOfForkingPaths: Yeah! It's amazing isn't it? I think it's just very skilled leather work.

>19 Dr.Fiddy: Thanks for your support! FH is a definite book binding and interior companion to D&H...maybe not the stories!

This looks fantastic. I will definitely be going for the Numbered edition.

Photos, I hope anyway, I can never really work out how to do this, and they are still coming out small! Damn. (What am I doing wrong?!!) Of our FROZEN HELL editions. This has been a long time coming, a two-year project that was way more complex than we thought, the interior with plates sewn in and tabbed in the sections, the scale of the Roman edition. The availability of materials, closing down of paper makers, all have contributed to the delays. We’re really pleased with the results, even if I say myself, it has turned out to be an extraordinary book!

The numbered edition is limited to 300 copies for sale and is fully bound in baby blue lambskin nappa which is soft and smooth to the touch. The leather is blocked in four passes, in white and black pigment foil creating a snowstorm design across the front and back boards, with the title on the spine.
The cover is a square spine structure with a wide groove between spine and boards, allowing the covers to open more freely.
All of the plates are tabbed or sewn in, allowing the double, treble and quad plates to open out without a stitched gutter.
The book is housed in a sturdy, white suede lined slipcase and is covered in a light blue/grey Windsor cloth with the ‘thing’ silhouette foil blocked to the front.

Binding is by Richard Tong and Sam Cartwright at Lyra’s Books/Ludlow Bookbinders.

Printed letterpress in two colours by Phil Abel and Robert Hetherington on a Heidelberg cylinder press at Hand & Eye Editions.
Set in metal monotype Baskerville 12pt.
Cast by Nick Gill at Effra Press.

The paper is Liber Charta 170gsm

Trimmed page size –200mm x 300mm / 7.9 in x 11.8 in
Page count – 166
Number of illustrations – 16 colour plates, 2 four-page foldouts, 4 double page spreads and 1 three-page foldout plate.
13 black and white relief printed illustrations.
Signed by the artist Greg Manchess
Limitation – 320 copies of which 300 are for sale and 20 Hors de Commerce

Price: £585

ROMAN

The Roman edition is limited to 30 copies for sale and is half-bradel bound in white Harmatan ‘Katsina’ goatskin leather with multiple cut-outs to the front board.
The ice cave structure on the front board of this huge edition is created with multiple layers of thin binder’s board hand cut and laminated together. The leather is then painstakingly moulded and formed by hand until the layers reveal themselves. Once the leather is set, the inside of the ice cave is carefully foil blocked in two colours. Both the front and back boards for this edition are around 10mm thick which creates a considerable and weighty book.

All of the plates are tabbed or sewn in, allowing the double, treble and quad plates to open out without a stitched gutter.

The endpapers for this edition are an original, hand marbled design by Freya Scott of Paperwilds.

The book comes housed in a half-bradel bound solander box, also covered with Harmatan ‘Katsina’ goatskin leather. The front board is split to create a crevasse in which the buried flying saucer lies. The saucer is foil blocked in three colours and the edges of the crevasse are hand cut from board before the leather is applied and then carefully moulded around the jagged edges. On the spine is a silk paper label, foil blocked in two colours. The solander box trays are double thickness and are covered in white Colorado cloth and lined with white suede and white leather. The large tray contains a foil blocked silhouette of the ‘thing’. Inside the small tray, under the book, is a cloth bound portfolio with a three-sided pocket containing an original, mounted sketch by Greg Manchess.

Binding is by Richard Tong and Sam Cartwright at Lyra’s Books/Ludlow Bookbinders.

You can see videos of how this edition is created HERE

Printed letterpress in two colours by Phil Abel and Robert Hetherington on a
Heidelberg cylinder press at Hand & Eye Editions.
Set in metal monotype Baskerville 12pt.
Cast by Nick Gill at Effra Press.

The paper is Magnani Pescia 160 gsm

Trimmed page size –260mm x 390mm / 10.25in x 15.35in.
Page count – 166
Number of illustrations – 16 colour plates, 2 four-page foldouts, 4 double page spreads and 1 three-page foldout plate.
13 black and white relief printed illustrations.
Signed by the artist Greg Manchess.
Limitation – 40 copies of which 30 are for sale and 10 Hors de Commerce

Price: £2950

ESTIMATED PUBLICATION Spring 2024































Edited to add: film of the making of the Numbered edition here: https://arete-editions-blog.com/frozen-hell-numbered-edition/
Film of the making of the Roman edition here: https://arete-editions-blog.com/frozen-hell-roman-edition/
as they didn't come through on the blurb above

I would have loved to have Who Goes There and Frozen Hell in one volume 😊

>24 marceloanciano: The design of the Roman Edition is one of the best limited editions I have ever seen, full stop. If it were within reach I'd be proud to have it.

As for your photo woes, the website where you upload them gives you some choices as to how to link the image. I can see the large originals by right-clicking on a photo and doing "open image in new tab". It looks like you are using the "Thumbnail for forums" option they offer, which are the small images linked to their site for the full-sized versions. Try using the "Direct link" option instead and manually specify the size, like so. You'll need to write out the full image tag by hand and put the link in the "src" attribute. The "width" attribute is the desired image width in pixels.

<img src="https://i.postimg.cc/52h3PmZr/frozen-m.jpg" width="600"/>

Result:

>26 Shadekeep: ahh, think I got that! Thank you for your kind words! The book feels extraordinary in hand, so pleased with the way it came out.

These books are absolutely gorgeous and clearly a labour of love. They're very impressive. I wish I could afford the Roman edition, but that's beyond my means. It's still a pleasure just to look at it - I've never seen anything like what you did with the leather on the front. But the numbered edition is also very beautiful and I'll try for that one.

The books I already have from you are such a pleasure. What you do with them really enhances the reading experience in addition to the books just being such a beauty themselves.

>28 SF-72: Thank you so much, we, Greg and I, really were attempting to make the reading experience immersive in the book, both with the covers by Rich and the interiors. It is a shame that there will only be a few that have the experience of the Roman though, the scale of white paper and the explosion of massive plates is really immersive and impressive, but, wow, the cost and time of making it! The numbered is much more manageable, both in hand and it fits on the shelf and I am soo pleased and chuffed with the way it came out. It has an elegance about it.

>24 marceloanciano: Amazing!

I'm curious how many people who purchased the wonderful fine press edition of "Who Goes There?" by Angel Bomb will also purchase Frozen Hell? The latter was never published by Campbell, which makes you wonder if he actually preferred the shorter "Who Goes There?" or if he never had time to finish the longer Frozen Hell? Anyway, for anyone still looking for a copy of Who Goes There --
https://www.angelbomb.com/shop-2/who-goes-there-standard-edition

>31 astropi: that is my concern about the Arete edition. It’s not my usual genre, but the Arete version itself looks so impressive I might be willing to take the risk - though if the story is better as a novella than a full length novel, that changes the calculus

The community is splited tbh.
50% like the edited version more and 50% the unedited (Frozen Hell)

Found a nice source -
https://bloody-disgusting.com/editorials/3706147/frozen-hell-the-history-of-the-...

The most noticeable difference between Frozen Hell and “Who Goes There?” is that the first three chapters are essentially removed for the shorter version. These chapters are actually quite good, but they are unnecessary. The information needed from them is summarized in McReady’s (this is how the name is spelled in the novella) recounting of the finding and accidental destruction of the spacecraft and the discovery of the Thing frozen in the Antarctic ice in the first chapter of “Who Goes There?” Beginning in its fourth chapter, Frozen Hell begins to resemble its legendary final version more and more. By the end it features almost no differences from the final version. Ultimately, “Who Goes There?” benefits from a quicker pace and the sense of claustrophobia amplified by confining the entirety of the story to Big Magnet base, but Frozen Hell is still a worthy read for those interested in Campbell’s work.

Does anyone know whether Campbell's edits were prompted by his own preferences as the author or by pressure from his editor/publisher to shorten the story based on some pre-defined length for publication? In other words, was the edit the author's intent or the publisher's requirement?

>35 ultrarightist: Good question - again, referring to the link I have above, this is what they note

Sometime in the spring of 1937, while still struggling to make any sort of living as a writer, he pitched an idea to the editor of Argosy magazine, Jack Byrne, to use the thushol from “Brain-Stealers” in a horror story set on earth. Byrne liked the idea and Campbell set out to write the story and had completed the first version, titled Frozen Hell, within a couple of months of this meeting. The story was rejected by Byrne, who according to Campbell said, “it’s a good yarn, good ideas, good writing. But there aren’t any characters in it.” This novel was later revised and streamlined into the final version of “Who Goes There?” It wasn’t until 2011 that there was even wide knowledge that this longer version existed, and at the time it was assumed to be lost. While working on a biography of Campbell in 2017, author Alec Nevala-Lee discovered several manuscripts including two folders bearing the label “Pandora” or “Frozen Hell.” This longer version of the story was published in 2019 and offers a glimpse into the composition and revision process of a gifted writer and editor.

>31 astropi: I do have that edition of Who Goes There? and am going to try my darnedest to get Frozen Hell. Some years ago I backed the KS that brought out the first edition of Frozen Hell. There were some issues with that release however, whereas I feel the Areté version will be getting everything perfect.

>32 jsg1976: >33 Ragnaroek: Gotta say, I preferred the longer version. Call me old fashioned but I like the way you got know the characters as scientists first, you got a sense of them being driven by science. Their ‘ordinary’, normal, lives before they find the anomaly. Then comes their change in behaviour when the creature is brought into their camp. Their paranoia is more grounded I feel. I liked it more. It also feels like an adventure structure than only a horror structure. As to whether the writer liked the cut down, more modern approach, who knows? A success of the cut down story may mean that; why change it? For him anyway.

>38 marceloanciano:
Yeah. It feels more real. 🙂
Is the book ready for shipping ?

>38 marceloanciano: Interesting that you and Byrne (per >36 astropi:) essentially reached opposite conclusions about character development in the longer version. I have not read either version yet, but I struggle to conceive how removing those pre-anomaly chapters could in any way enhance (rather than detract from) character development.

In any case, I'm looking forward to reading it and having another fine Arete edition in my collection.

>39 Ragnaroek: We're doing pre-sales to get enough money in to make the book, delivery will be in the first quarter of 24, might well be sooner but it is a complex production.

>41 marceloanciano:
😊

Frozen Hell is up for order now, but curiously I'm getting a "No shipping options for this location, package weight and total." message when checking out. I'm at a home address in Virginia, not sure why it's not allowing it.

>44 supercell: Try again, I got that too as per my earlier post. The order went through now. Possibly the system was overloaded.

Current tally is 262, so quite a few sold just during my checkout process.

>44 supercell: they’ve fixed the shipping issue

I have the same error...
Doesnt work. No matter what I do. I will wait some time.

Try Google pay if you have that. I had the same error trying with a credit card, but Google pay worked.

My bank flagged the order for fraud so had to go back and do it again.

£67.00 as shipping to Sweden is a lot. I think I will pass on this.

Ordered my copy ❤️‍🔥😊👍

Congrats on everyone who's getting the order to go through. The shipping is a touch high, but a small fraction of the item price and worth it to get the book delivered safely.

Current remaining copies are 10 Roman and 222 Numbered.

Luckily, my order of the Numbered Edition went through right away 😊
I thought it would have sold better in the first few hours though (212 remaining now), but maybe the price is putting people off? The shipping is certainly high; £67 is the most I have paid within Europe so far...

The lack of PayPal, plus restrictions for only Mastercard & Visa are both putting me off. Unfortunate.

>55 Objectr:
I can understand that, but you can safe alot of money if you pay without PayPal, when there is an currency change involved. ( PayPal charges you arround 2-6% which is insane)
You can check out "Revolut", there you can order an credit card without currency change charges and monthly/yearly fees.
I can highly recommend that.

>56 Ragnaroek: They stopped using PayPal because PayPal kept the money for months before passing it on.

>57 kdweber: oh yes I know 😊
I ordered an credit card myself and iam proud I dont have to pay with PayPal anymore. Like I wrote are the currency change fees at PayPal extremely high. With my credit card I don't have any anymore.

>54 Dr.Fiddy: I thought it would go pretty quick as well, even though it's one of the most expensive fine press books I've bought. I even set a phone alarm for the moment it came out. The Roman is down to 8, which is a nice sign at least, and good for Arete. We'll see how many of the Numbered remain after a month.

Shipping is expensive, but fair. I know that shipping anything internationally is never cheap. The total in USD is about $830 -- not going to lie, that's a lot of money. I wish there was a way to pay in installments.

>59 Shadekeep:
I'm not sure this is an extremely popular/ well known book outside the fan base 🤔
It will take a long time to sell out in my opinion. Most people only know this book under the title "Who Goes There?" .
There is an Letterpress gorgeous version from angel bomb which isn't sold out right now.
Btw iam sure If this would have been an Suntup title it had been sold out already do the right system and all the speculants😅

>60 astropi: I only know Suntup and Books Illustrated offer this kind of service

>60 astropi: According to a Facebook update from Arete, it looks like paying in installments is possible.

https://www.facebook.com/AreteEditions/posts/pfbid021aWXmsT2NFdarrSDAfqdorH6RWaM...

Interesting that John Campbell's name as the author of Frozen Hell appears nowhere on the Arete site.

>63 BooksFriendsNotFood:
Interesting, but would paying with PayPal then really be so bad ? I mean okay, 3 month with no money (in the worst case) , the installment would be better, but not everyone has a credit card or want one.
(I like mine since iam no native UK or USA ...)

>61 Ragnaroek: It's certainly not as well known as the novella, especially as its existence has only been known for much shorter span of years. It has developed some cachet, but I was more expecting this to sell out quickly based on Arete's reputation. It is not a cheap book however, and is likely to give many in the usual audience pause.

>66 Shadekeep: I just found out recently about Arete and iam deeply shaken that I have missed out on the The Case of Honey.... 😞

It's not a good thing if you keep alot of stock for very long in this kind of business I assume since you need to pay the production in advance. 320× ~ 500£ + 40× 2950£ is alot of money. ( yeah I know there is the profit already included, but still a hefty sum )

I hope my numbered edition will arrive ASAP, probably early next year. Its so gorgeous and designed with love.

And some amazing works are still on the way.
1.Benjamin Button
2. Brave new world
And from Lyras
3. Wizard if Oz
3.1 ( the remaining stock of standard Caroline's)

>59 Shadekeep: >67 Ragnaroek: I really hope Frozen Hell will be a success. Areté and Lyra's are two of my favourite presses, and I would like to see them realising their ambitions and continuing their amazing fine press work.

>65 Ragnaroek: It was a healthy sale but not great, I was hoping for better. I was hoping we’d sell on the craft; it really is a step up with book making craft, for us and most. We just couldn’t use PP because about 90% of the cover price is cost to make them, the fixed costs mean that we need the cash to pay for the making, paper alone is about 25k, colour printing is 22k, letterpress is a lot, binding and stitching is an enormous part of the price, artist needs to be paid, and all costs have risen considerably, all of which means that we need to have the cash upfront and not wait up to eight months before PP release the money.

>54 Dr.Fiddy:
>61 Ragnaroek:
>66 Shadekeep:

This will probably sell very slowly for several reasons. 'Who Goes There' is a classic novella that has already received a nice private press edition from Angel Bomb Press. Although not as elaborate and luxurious as the Areté Edition, it is considerably less expensive and quite well done. The need for 'Frozen Hell' , which is a recently discovered alternate version that is 45 pages longer, is questionable. The added length is detrimental to the original story, which moves along at a faster pace and is the more interesting read. With the 62 GBP shipping charge to the United States the total cost becomes $821 which makes it a difficult purchase to justify, especially if one already owns the Angel Bomb Press edition.

I had no particular interest in the title when first announced, but I ended up surprising myself and ordering a copy. Very different (in many ways) to the rest of my collection, and the obvious effort that has gone into it (with a decent quantity of illustrations which I really like) drew me in.

>68 supercell: Agreed, The Adventure of the Creeping Man is certainly worth having, and if you can bundle it with the order it becomes an even better bargain.

>71 dlphcoracl: I don't necessarily see it as competing with the original story, but more as a variant thereof which can be enjoyed in its own right. Similar to the two different takes on Dracula that translators did (both somewhat confusingly named Powers of Darkness). One can look at it as a "director's cut", which may not be as classic as the original but which gives some additional insight into the story. I'm enough of a fan that it appeals to me, but acknowledge this is unlikely to be the case more broadly, particularly at a price that precludes the more casually interested.

>70 marceloanciano:
So would do you do if for example the last 150 copy's sell very late ? 🤔

>71 dlphcoracl:
Exactly 👍
Most people know the film from John Carpenter I assume, which is incredibly good.

>73 Shadekeep:
Amaranthine Press is going hard in on Sherlock Holmes. I had preferred the Neil Gaiman story.
It's an amazing beautiful book

>64 wcarter:
The only think I dislike so far is that the Authors name is not on the spine.

>75 Ragnaroek: Well, I only have to pay for the stitching and bindings of the books sold, just have to cover the fixed costs like paper, printing etc

>79 marceloanciano:
Oh okay 🙂
I hope it will sell well. I love it and glad i ordered my copy ❤️‍🔥

I'm curious to see the fold out artwork (at least my understanding is that there are several fold outs). Personally, I think I might find this cumbersome while reading. Overall the execution looks nice but the subject doesn't really interest me enough to justify the price. I think it is great to see a wider selection of books getting the fine press treatment though and wish arete all success.

>70 marceloanciano: >79 marceloanciano: Would it be an option to reduce the limitation in order to reduce the fixed costs if, after a certain time, the sales aren’t at the level you need?

>82 Dr.Fiddy: That would be nice! But, unfortunately the fixed costs are spread across the limitation, if we had a smaller limitation that would mean that the cost for each book would be more. Fixed costs being all the costs apart from what Ludlow's do, so costs that need to be paid early. So the only thing we save is the cost of binding, which only comes into play once books are pre-ordered, does that make sense? It is the limitation that dictates the cost of making the books. More books, less cover price, less books greater cover price. I wanted to do 200 numbered but the books were working out as way, way, too expensive.

>83 marceloanciano: Thank you for your explanation. Yes, that makes sense. Hope it all works out in the end. I'm really looking forward to it 😊

>84 Dr.Fiddy: Thanks!! Having said that, the way to do these books in the current market, and the costs of materials in this current market, is to make books with less pages, and not as crafted as a hundred years ago. Says he, who is doing a 300 page novel; Lud. And Brave New World, which is 250 pages at least! And, in order to do the artist's vision for BNW, we've had to do two different books in completely different type sizes in metal, the Artist edition has his prints bound in, which he's making, are large in size, so to make the book readable and in balance requires two versions... conceived when prices were cheaper...

>85 marceloanciano:
Fine Press in general has not alot of members I would say, it can be an very expensive hobby and not alot of people are willing to pay 750€ for an Book with 150 pages which you could buy and read for 10€ in an paperback version.

The old crafts are dying with each year...
People wanna have cheap stuff. In Germany most people didn't even care about what they eat, important is, that its as cheap as possible...

>85 marceloanciano: Do you mind if I ask where Lud is in the sequence of planned titles? Next, a few books later, much later? It's one I'm really looking forward to, especially as no one else is doing a version from what I've seen.

>87 Shadekeep: Benjamin, then a Conan story, then Brave new world, then Lud. Lud may come before BNW. It may change as we also have a couple of Lyra Press books between them. I'll try and post one of the Lud art plates, it has a load of images, nearly 50.

>88 marceloanciano: Splendid art! I'll look forward to it whenever it comes out. Also interested in Brave New World, and the idea of a Conan tale is intriguing too.

Lud in the Mist?

>90 Ragnaroek: It is!!

>91 marceloanciano: ❤️‍🔥

>88 marceloanciano: What a great looking art plate!! I'm not sure about Conan, but you can definitely count me in on Benjamin, BNW and Lud 😊

I never read any Conan tbh. I thought it were comics 😳
Aren't there 100 Books ? 😳

>94 Ragnaroek: The originals, were printed in the '30's, way before the commercialisation of the character in the '70/80's. The first stories created by Robert E. Howard are very different than the comics and movies. Although Arnold Schwarzenegger's movie propelled the character into the mainstream, it is a very different character.

>94 Ragnaroek: The original stories are by Robert E. Howard, who was part of Lovecraft's extended weird circle. Howard's serpent folk appear in other writers' mythos tales, for example. There are about 20 Conan books by him, including story collections, depending on how one counts them.

https://www.fantasticfiction.com/h/robert-e-howard/

EDIT: Crossposted with @marceloanciano

>94 Ragnaroek: Robert E. Howard wrote about fifteen Conan novels. Many more followed, by various authors. And then, of course, there were the comics.
The Howard books come highly recommended!

Incidentally, my one personal involvement with the Conan books to date was the logo and cover text design for the series as released by Spatterlight Press in the Netherlands. It was a fun assignment.

  

>98 Shadekeep: Oh cool!

>98 Shadekeep: I can imagine that was a fun assignment. The design looks really great!

>99 marceloanciano: >100 Dr.Fiddy: Thanks kindly!

I think iam looking forward to buy this fine press beauty then, when it will get released . The conan universe is extremely awesome 👌

I am extremely excited about Lud-in-the-Mist.

Benjamin Button and Razor’s Edge are the two I’m really keen on, though I expect Brave New World will also tempt me

Razors Edge ?

>105 Ragnaroek: >104 DMulvee: razor's edge is a long way away

Over the years we've definitely discussed REH's works in details. Here is one thread:

Wandering Star -- The Robert E. Howard Collection
https://www.librarything.com/topic/326168

>107 astropi: They were the first limited edition books I ever made! I hold them dear.

>107 astropi: thank you 👍❤️‍🔥🙂

>107 astropi: Oh, I'm sorry I missed that Solomon Kane book! I think the upcoming Conan release has moved onto my "must have" list now.

I would love to have an Solomon Kane trilogy fine press edition ❤️

>111 Ragnaroek: I've actually have a Fine Press edition of all the stories ready to go! I'm hesitant because of some language from the '30's which is hard to deal with really. One of the chapters is called 'The White-Skinned Conqueror' and some of his descriptions of the native people in Africa, which is where most of the stories are set, are ... tricky. So, I thought, I'd get some Conan stories out there first.

>112 marceloanciano:
I'm looking forward to everything Arete and Lyras is publishing 😊❤️‍🔥

>112 marceloanciano: I'll be down for that one as well! And yes, he can be almost as problematic as Lovecraft in places. But I think most people are good with a preface that explains the attitudes of the times and such, and that publication is not endorsement. Proper framing is key.

>112 marceloanciano: As >114 Shadekeep: noted, a good preface with historical insight into the misguided ideals of eugenics etc. will explain (not excuse) why REH and some others used language and ideas which we rightfully find appalling today. Also, I would love a COMPLETE REH fine press collection! I think Wandering Star did them perfectly, focusing on heroes other than just Conan. In fact, one of REH's most masterful short story and a classic of the genre -- Worms of the Earth is a Bran Mak Morn story.

>114 Shadekeep: >115 astropi: It is, and it's finding someone who can contextualise the stories and add weight to what they are saying. Worms of the Earth is a great story! The nice thing is that we have revisited the Solomon Kane and Conan stories with Gary Gianni and redone them in such away that the art shines! Ready for relief printing. And added a wealth of images. The Conan story is lush with art. Kane has a picture virtually every page, I was so pleased with the way that I did the Wandering Star book, but, I was a naïve with design, these are so much better.

>115 astropi: Well said. And Worms of the Earth is a definite classic, certainly worthy of fine reprint.

>116 marceloanciano: I have confidence you'll find the right person to give the works context. And glad you'll be employing Gianni again!

The name of the author should be included too 😅

>118 supercell: I noticed that too. I think some collectors justify their purchases by convincing themselves they can easily flip or sell on an expensive book. This justification obviously falls apart if the book is not scarce or demand fails to exceed supply. Seeing 200 available copies will likely cause such a collector to pump the brakes. From a sales perspective, showing a counter is only helpful if it suggests that demand is high and the book is about to sell out. Probably a good move.

Really stupid that people just buy books for profit...
They steal people theire fav. storys in an fine press treatment, just to sell it to them for the double or triple...

>121 Ragnaroek: I've always hated scalpers, and I think the best way to fight them is simply to ensure enough demand. Of course easier said than done, especially with something as niche as fine books. Still, book collecting and searching for rare manuscripts etc is thousands of years old! I feel that book collectors and resellers are two sides of the same coin.

>122 astropi: I don't think rare manuscript hunters/sellers are in the same execrable league as those who scalp new fine press editions.

>122 astropi: There’s a huge difference between a book dealer marking up something they were sold or put effort into tracking down and a flipper buying something they know you want before you get the chance to so they can sell it to you for more.

>122 astropi: >124 NathanOv: Certainly, I agree. That said, booksellers are in the business of making money, like any business. Doesn't Subterranean purchase (not all the time, but certainly at times) decently large number of Suntup and Centipede books to resell? I know I've seen them do this, so are they also scalpers? -- I'm seriously asking, I'm not being facetious.

>125 astropi: Publishers have always maintained standing orders or retailer agreements with bookstores and other sellers. Some publishers sell exclusively this way, like many of those represented by Vamp and Tramp.

You wouldn’t call Barnes and Noble a scalper of Penguin, for example.

I know Subterranean occasionally marks books up to current market value, like the Centipede edition of Dune, but if I recall correctly that one was for charity.

>124 NathanOv: Established bookselling businesses routinely purchase books for 40% of retail value (or less), and advertise this openly. Does it matter that their suppliers could get literally more than twice the money with a little more effort? They’re buying up books for vastly below retail and putting them on the shelf the next day for 150% profit.

Here’s a test - I’m buying up books I know people want in order to resell it for a profit, thereby acting as a middle person of debatable utility. Who am I? A “bookseller” or a scalper?

>125 astropi: To your point, Subterranean Press is selling the standard version of Death and Honey for $700, with no mention of charity. They also have many other instances of this. Sometimes they do indicate markups are for charity, but it’s definitely not all the time. Bookseller, or scalper?

>127 What_What: Yes, I completely agree. We're talking about luxury items and if people are able to profit from them, either who cares or good for them. I guess it's unfortunate to some who are unable to get the book they desire (this has happened to me quite a few times,) but if someone, either a scalper or bookseller, is able to make a few dollars, so what? It's not like the Taylor Swift Tickermaster fiasco where bots are buying up everything. And ,even for that case, at the end of the day who cares? Think about how fortunate and blessed all of our lives are if this is something we're complaining about - "I was unable to get a pretty book which I could get at the local library for free because someone got it before me and sold it at a higher price."

It's not like we're talking about a grain seller buying up all the grain during a famine and selling at exorbitant prices, we're talking about a luxury commodity...

>127 What_What: I think your comparison of limited edition scalpers with mass market booksellers is disingenuous, for a couple of reasons:
1) We're talking about highly limited products here, which is not generally the case for established bookselling businesses. This completely changes things. Of course people get irate when they miss out on a book they wanted because scalpers - who are only interested in profit and not the book - contribute to a fast sell out. And clearly, fast sellouts are necessary for the scalper to have any 'business model' at all. The scalper only has a business if some people miss out. Witness Frozen Hell. No sell out = no business for scalpers (and yes, I know there's the odd scalper who tried to raise prices before a sellout, in the hope that the buyer won't notice, but that's taking unscrupulous to the next level).
2) Mass market booksellers are providing a service which the publishers are not usually providing themselves, the organized centralization and selling of books from multiple publishers. In this respect, their businesses are necessary, and of course running such a business, whether online or physical, comes with many costs. It's not all profit, as you seem to suggest. It's also why most mass market books come with an RRP set by the publisher, which it's difficult for the bookseller to exceed. In the limited edition world the scalper's business is almost entirely unnecessary, given that the norm is for publishers to sell directly to customers. What exactly is the scalper contributing to the process to justify their 'service'? No doubt someone will respond with something like 'they're helping customers who missed out', but I'd counter that by saying that some people missed out because of scalpers.

Of course, in reality it's difficult to separate genuine scalpers from those who genuinely wanted the book but then had to sell for any number of reasons. But they know who they are.

>128 Joshbooks1: I’m happy to be able to share the same perspective on something with you.

>128 Joshbooks1:
But that is exactly what an scrupulous grain seller would do and what is happening right now in the real world. Money rules the world.
It doesn't matter if its an non eatable product or something else.
Such people are disgusting.
We cant change it, so we don't need to deepen the talk abou it.
Let's stay with the books, especially the Arete Editions in this case.

>130 What_What: Maybe we can become friends and hang out sometime?!?

>131 Ragnaroek: Again, we're talking about books. High end luxury items with pretty bindings, content and material; books which we can read for free at the local library. Who cares if someone makes a few extra dollars if they buy premium books and flip them for profit. Whether it is a scalper or bookseller (is a bookseller just a professional scalper?) none of us on this forum need these books. It is a lavish and niche hobby. The simple fact that people are complaining about this subject really shows how entitled we are. I am also guilty of this at times.

It does matter if it is a luxury product or a human necessity. I don't need a thousand dollar book which is a materialistic possession that has no regard to my survival and in the larger picture has little meaning to my life. It is a very fun hobby and is a passion of mine, like, I imagine, a lot of other people here. I love books and reading in my room looking at my collection of books, but, I do have a hard time when people shout about the horrors of someone buying a luxury product and scream foul when they are inconvenienced. None of us here need these books just like none of us need to see Taylor Swift, or watch a playoff sporting event or buy the newest iphone or buy a luxury car. But I do need food, housing and medical care and if and when people extort these commodities which certainly happens ever more frequently in the US where I live, then, yes, I do have a problem with that and view it as disgusting which you state.

>132 Joshbooks1: I don’t know if I’d go that far, but I can commit to removing the Joshbooks1 sticker off the voodoo doll next to my bed.

I don't buy the relativistic morality that the less essential something is the less objectionable it is to profiteer over it. This kind of sliding scale can apply somewhat to the severity of the action (people are far less likely to die from being unable to buy books than buy food), but honestly it doesn't change the moral calculus one whit. Profiteering is deleterious to both the producer and to the intended audience. It makes the producer's goods less fairly available, and skews the price from what they consider fair to what the profiteers can gouge people for. And the intended audience suffers because they are denied either the item itself or the fair price to obtain it. This can form a loopback cycle, costing the producer a base of loyal customers, harming their long-term viability.

Do the two extremes of profiteering matter the same in terms of impact? Of course not. But it doesn't change the moral weight of the action. Just as stealing $20 from a wealthy person impacts them far less than stealing it from someone in poverty, but in neither case does it excuse stealing itself.

Just as a discussion point because I don't really have a hard and fast view either way: At the end of the day, a reseller or a regular book reader/collector is paying the same amount of money to buy one copy of a limited edition book. (I'm keeping it one copy to remove the variable of scalpers bulk buying.) At that point, the book is that person's, so isn't it theirs to do what they like with it, whether that is own it, resell it for a profit, or even (the horror) destroy it or dump it in the trash? And while the first and third choices pretty much remove that book from circulation for one to many generations, perhaps some people who weren't aware of the release at the time, didn't have the money at the time, or who weren't quick enough to snatch it up would rather pay 2-3x the original price to possess a copy rather than miss out on it entirely? (After all, if these customers didn't exist, reselling wouldn't be profitable. And if the reseller is unable to make the sale, don't they end up as an inadvertent collector?) And even if someone who genuinely loved the limited book decides to sell it either due to unhauling it or due to financial needs (and as an aside, who's to say whether the reseller is also just trying to send their kids to uni), with the exception of the rare individual or someone who is satisfied with their wealth, the reader/collector is going to attempt to make a decent profit from it. Does this make them a latent reseller with the same (potentially moral) dilemmas as someone reselling it immediately?

In an ideal world (although even this is arguable because some books may only be as desirable as they are due to their limitation), books would not be limited and editions would not go out of print, so that everyone who is interested in a book can get a copy whenever they want and thus, book resellers would not exist; however, this obviously isn't the case (for example, even if everyone who buys the limited book is a genuine reader/collector, there will still be people missing out) so I find this topic interesting to think about.

shadekeep has got it absolutely right. What difference does it make if there is a book or something else. morally it is still reprehensible.
You call a book for £500 a luxury good, but you certainly also drive a car, eat fruit and vegetables, meat probably too. All three have become extremely expensive luxury goods in today's world, and not everyone can afford them or wants to. An car is an extreme luxury good that one could do without. There are buses and trains...
Most people who can afford books for £500 already have a good job anyway and speculate on books, only to sell them again for 2-6 times as much. There's no poor low-income earner sitting there gnawing at the subsistence level, happy that he can pay the next 6 months' rent with the book sales, but someone who wann enrich himself even more.

Of course, that's extremely clever and I don't begrudge anyone, but morally it's still the last straw. The book is not suddenly made of pure gold.

It's the same with concert tickets. There are people who "steal" tickets from people because they know that the concert will sell out quickly and then sell the ticket for three times as much.
That is absolutely immoral and disgusting. (Of course, it's also a clever speculation if you make a profit).

Well, anyway... we won't get together there.

>136 Ragnaroek: Just to clarify my hypothetical example: I agree that no poor person is buying a copy of a Limited Edition book for resale, but it could potentially be a lower middle class to middle class person who is trying to make an extra few hundred dollars (or few thousand dollars if we're counting multiple resales of different Limited books) which they can use to supplement their primary income — and this can, for instance, contribute to anything from paying tuition to going on vacation, or even perhaps buying expensive fine press books that they actually want to keep. I doubt that anyone who has a significant amount of money left after paying rent/mortage and bills is spending their free time trying to flip books. (Again, I don't have a stance on reselling - my view is more of a neutral "resellers exist" - but it's interesting to hear both sides of the argument discussed.)

To challenge the point you raised and/or to play devil's advocate:

Can a reseller who buys one (1) copy of a Limited book in order to make a profit be compared morally to a thief? The book they are buying doesn't belong to anyone at the time of purchase and they paid for it fair and square (and as long as they aren't using bots, they put in the same effort as everyone else). One may argue that that is one less book available for a person who really wants it, but which is worse: A) a person who buys the book and then puts it up for sale at a higher price, or B) a person who buys the book and then shoves it in their bookshelf and never looks at it again and thus takes it out of circulation for a potentially more "deserving" reader who'd look at the book every day? Who has the right to judge what kind of person is more "deserving", or to determine that only people with X intentions can be allowed to purchase the book?

The answer is obviously pretty clear if we're looking at something needed to survive; for example, if person A will die without an apple and person B with a full stomach pays for it first and resells it for a higher price, that's pretty morally repugnant. But as people have pointed out, a "pretty book" is an unnecessary, luxury item, and who can say if a person is more deserving of the transaction depending on whether they want to buy the book to put it on a bookshelf and never touch it VS. buy the book and read it constantly VS. buy the book to rip out the illustrations and stick them on a wall VS. buy the book as a gift for someone who doesn't actually want it VS. buy the book and attempt (and possibly fail) to sell it for a higher price in order to make extra cash? The argument may get a bit blurry here since each individual desires the book, but for different reasons (and none of the options result in the death or significant reduction of quality of life for anyone else)...

(It's nearly 5AM here so I can only hope this thought experiment makes sense outside of my brain lol. If this is too hypothetical, feel free to ignore.)

The following is not so relevant, but I'd also just like to note that it seems to me that in many states in the U.S., a car is actually more or less necessary because public transportation here often sucks / doesn't really exist / is not viable. Also, even flipping a book for a $1,000 profit may not even cover one month's rent in many places unfortunately, although as you mentioned, I doubt book flipping is the primary source of someone's rent haha.

(And with this hideously long comment, I bid you all goodnight / good day.)

>137 BooksFriendsNotFood:
Oh gosh , that's a very long text. I highly appreciate you're time investment on this .
Youre points are valide.
It's an really hard discussion I don't wanna continue, because I can't express my thoughts 100% in writing. We shouldn't stick to stuff we cant change like I said before. It doesn't matter if someone says: ... "disgusting", "thief", "scraper" ... we won't change this and so it shouldn't be worth our time.
Let's stick to stuff that we can change and which affects us.
The luxury book I missed is sad, but there are coming so much each month. (It doesn't change what I said above, I cant change it, so its not worth my time).

Let's discuss future Arete Editions here.
We could make an new thread if someone wanna continue this discussion.

>138 Ragnaroek: Fair enough! Thank you for taking the time to read through that long comment XD

My problem with scalpers is when they describe the book as unread and it is still sealed, it appears they only bought the book to try and profit rather than getting enjoyment from the product itself. If they had actually read the book then I am happier, as in that scenario it feels like a reader who has decided to use the money for another purchase.

I think if the book was released more than 6 months ago, then it is all fair. But if a book was released last week, and a seller immediately lists it as unread I find this frustrating

>140 DMulvee: I'm now suspicious of "still sealed." I bought a book that was a few years out of print that was sealed and opened it to find a section was misprinted - the text block was printed too high for about twenty pages and was scraping the top of the page. It made me wonder if the seller knew it and re-shrinkwrapped it so he could claim ignorance of the condition.

>141 LeBacon: that's exactly why you should always be suspicious when it's listed as still sealed.
I had bought an sealed Suntup Book once and the signature page was missing 🤣
Better buy an Book second hand without the shrink wrap from an seller of youre trust. It will be cheaper without the shrink wrap too.

>141 LeBacon: Definitely view sealed books with a jaundiced eye. A lot of bookjackers/bookdumpers know that folks will pay more for a pristine sealed copy, and a shrink-wrapper becomes a cheap investment if it adds value to a used book. It's always funny when someone tries selling something sealed that was never sealed in the first place. Old bookshelf games from Avalon Hill are a prime example.

Good update newsletter from Arete on titles in progress. Frozen Hell seems to be coming along nicely, and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button should be for pre-order soon. Also included are a couple more images from the eagerly awaited Lud-in-the-Mist, and they are looking splendid.

  

And the mentioned Robert E. Howard story sounds intriguing to say the least.

sk

What a wonderful day with wonderful news 🥰

I am so excited about Lud-in-the-Mist.

>144 Shadekeep: these look fantastic

The illustrations for Lud in the Mist looks wonderful. And then imagine them in the gorgeous print quality of past books done by them.

>149 SF-72: They do look excellent!

Speaking selfishly, I do hope they will offer some of these future titles in standard (or 'Fine') editions too. In any case, I'm really looking forward to seeing all these books take shape.

>144 Shadekeep: >147 ambyrglow: >148 SDB2012: >149 SF-72: >150 GardenOfForkingPaths: They are amazing aren't they? He's doing about 32 full pagers, designed for relief printing, and a large amount of spot illustrations. We are in the process of soft proofing metal monotype to reflect the old nature of the story, it's going to be a very nice book.

>145 frik51: It really is a return to my roots! The first limited edition book I made, rather naively, was by Robert E Howard under Wandering Star, ohh, twenty five years ago now. It is really pleasurable to go back to him.

All looking excellent, it's great to see the time and effort that goes into the creation of arete's editions. Plenty to look forward to (I'm particularly looking forward to Lud).

>151 marceloanciano: Your edition of Lud-in-the-Mist has remained in the top three books I'm looking forward to ever since it was announced. It is exactly what I come to fine press for.

>151 marceloanciano: Wow, 32 full pagers of the quality highlighted in >144 Shadekeep: is going to be something very special indeed. The only issue I foresee with this title is that there's going to be a loooooong wait for it (only half joking actually - the fact that fine press output is often the complete antithesis of this world of mass produced consumer goods and instant gratification is generally something I very much appreciate).

>154 Shadekeep: what are the other two books in your top three?

>151 marceloanciano:

That sounds absolutely wonderful and very impressive. It's one of the things I enjoyed immensely about Death & Honey, that it was so richly illustrated.

>151 marceloanciano: That is spectacular! I'm really looking forward to it, as well as all the others you are working on. But, first: Enter Benjamin Button 😊

ha ha ha >155 Levin40: Thanks for your encouragement! Appreciate it. Yes, our books do take a long time to pull together, there are just the three of us doing all the book making for both Arete and Lyra, we just don’t have the resources like the large press houses like Suntup and Centipede to do it faster, it’s just us three doing all the designing, printing and bindings. Only a certain amount we can do in a year but am very excited about Lud, Benjamin, Howard and Brave New World, all coming from Arete in the year.

>151 marceloanciano:

Your planned edition of Lud in the Mist is spectacular. Who is the artist making the illustrations?

>159 dlphcoracl: Scott McKowen. It was Neil Gaiman who suggested him, he had done the covers for some of his Marvel 1602 comics, the first comic art he'd done, he usually does theatre and book covers: https://punchandjudy.ca/illustration/

>160 marceloanciano:

That's gorgeous art on his website. Will the illustrations for Lud in the Mist all be black and white, or will there also be colour illustrations?

>161 SF-72: just black and white at the moment, like D&H, his colour work on the site is all digital over the line art, and for colour he'll have to give us each layer as an analog board, like his black and white works. At this time, I think I'd rather have more images.

>162 marceloanciano: I think black and white will work beautifully for Lud. Also looking forward to this one.

>158 marceloanciano: if you would do it like Suntup, I probably need an new and better payed job. Suntup alone is arround 500$ each month (often more).

>162 marceloanciano:

That makes complete sense, and more art is always great. There are artists who manually add colour to their scratchboard art, for example, and I thought this might be an example of it.

>152 marceloanciano: Can't wait to find out what will be coming our way! REH and HPL - anything by these two giants is very welcome indeed.

As someone who actually prefers black and white book illustrations (I know, I’m weird), the style is definitely one of the selling points for me.

>166 frik51: Did I miss mention of an HPL title? I'd love to see another Gary Gianni collaboration in the vein of his & Marcelo's "Call of Cthulhu," or even that one published in an upgraded edition!

Yes! HPL, please. I want a nice letterpress At the Mountains of Madness with a handsome leather cover and beautifully executed black and white wood engraving illustrations.

I know Centipede Press has long been rumored to do something similar but really any fine press willing to do it, I'm here and ready to throw money at you.

>168 NathanOv: and >169 LeBacon:

I think >166 frik51: was just speculating or wish-listing. I do know that Conversation Tree Press is planning to include at least one volume of HPL in its Weird series.

>170 ultrarightist: The fact that CTP is doing a single novel for Hodgson has me hoping they’ll do the same for Poe and Lovecraft, and give us nice matching editions of The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym and At The Mountains of Madness.

I really don’t think we need new “greatest hits” collections of either of those authors.

>170 ultrarightist: Can't wait for Conversation Tree's Weird. Their version of Peter Pan gives me really high hopes.

>155 Levin40: what are the other two books in your top three?

The Ethics of Ambiguity from No Reply Press, with the "choose your art" aspect, and Arden of Feversham from Tudor Black Press.

Also very high on the list but not yet confirmed (nor guaranteed to be letterpress) is The Hellbound Heart from Suntup.

>171 NathanOv: The fact that CTP is doing a single novel for Hodgson

Oh, didn't know that. So either The House on the Borderland (most likely) or The Night Land. Personally I'd go for The Boats of the Glen Carrig, but my tastes run towards nautical horror.

>173 Shadekeep: I believe they announced House On The Borderland, but I may be wrong.

I would’ve also preferred a Sargasso Sea collection. It feels odd to do a singular highlight of Hodgson and not pick something nautical.

>174 NathanOv: It does, doesn't it? It's his most consistent milieu, in spite of him also excelling at haunted houses, strange futures, and ghost hunting. I always firstly associate Hodgson with the terrors of the seas.

The first book of the WEIRD titles will be House on the Borderland. That's what the CTP webpage says .
20 WEIRD volumes in total are planned if iam correct.
Would be very disappointed to not see any POE or Lovecraft.

I'm most excited for Flowers for Algernon though. Lovely book. Next CPT announcement/ pre order should be next month, but not sure which title.

I ordered the numbered Frozen Hell today. I've been on fence because it's a pretty major investment, but I noticed on Facebook recently that Hand & Eye had posted some photos of the colour printed proofs of the paintings, and they look absolutely brilliant. I think the large fold-outs are going to pretty spectacular! Anyway, that's what finally, and happily, pushed me over the edge.

Frozen Hell looks to have been more time consuming than expected. A couple of short clips here giving some insight.
It’s a Facebook link but you don’t need to be a user to see the content.

https://www.facebook.com/AreteEditions?_rdr

Phil and Marcello should update their Arete Editions Blog more frequently, for those of us that don't use Facebook. I tried to look at their Facebook page but apparently you cannot see much without signing in.

>179 tkellici: Done. Insanely busy!

Thank you, sir! Always obliging.

Looks like numbered Frozen Hell editions start shipping next week.

Text from Facebook update copied below:

"We’ve all been working hard behind the scenes and we’ll have some terrific news coming very soon! However, for now...

Frozen Hell IMPORTANT.

Finally! The numbered edition of Frozen Hell is about to be shipped! If any of you that have ordered a book, I know it was a while ago now, and have moved or changed address PLEASE NOTIFY US!!

Ludlow’s are hoping to start sending the books out early next week. Phil is away on holiday next week too, so if you have a change of address, please let us know sooner than later.

The Lettered/Roman edition will be a little while longer as it is much more complicated and we wanted to get the Numbered out of the way first. The book blocks (the really complicated bit) are finished. The leather is all prepped for the boxes and books will be ready to go. Soon!"

>182 EdmundRodriguez: Can't wait... 👍😊

>182 EdmundRodriguez:

Looking forward to it.

>182 EdmundRodriguez: Amazing. Love Arete!

>182 EdmundRodriguez: Good news, looking forward to it!

>182 EdmundRodriguez: exciting news! However, that address confirmation note really needs to be an email to all purchasers. I would’ve missed it if it were just on Facebook.

Interestingly, the names of both the author and the illustrator have been added to the spine. An improvement over the initial design, I would say.

Now, better start clearing some shelf space - this is the largest Areté book yet. Benjamin Button still seems to be stuck somewhere in the pipeline, though.

>187 NathanOv: Agreed! I skipped this one but would have assumed this notification would have gone out via email as well? Are you sure that is not the case?

>187 NathanOv: Definitely! It's really a lapse on Arete's part not to have done so. They have the email addresses.

>191 Ragnaroekk: you received it? care to share further thoughts? I am on the fence about buying this one.

>187 NathanOv: >190 ultrarightist:

I can't believe they keep using Facebook for such an important notice.

>193 Ragnaroekk: Well, not that large! i based the size on most of my Limited Edition Club books I have, like The Circus of Dr. Lao, Nostromo...

>194 Inceptic: Yeah, it was unfortunate, Phil is away on holiday when Rich said that Frozen Hell is ready to ship. Phil handles all the communication from Arete and couldn't get to a signal, so we took a view, either we waited another month or start to organize the shipping and hope he gets to a signal soon.

>196 marceloanciano: Phil sent emails this morning, so everything should be ok 😊
Really looking forward to this one!

Got the shipping notification for Frozen Hell today 😊

Just received my "Frozen Hell" in the US. Beautiful edition. The design of the book and, especially, the intricate placement of the illustrations explains the long time it took to prepare. Looking forward to Benjamin Button now.

Does Arete send out tracking numbers once they ship the books?

>202 Inceptic: I got a notice directly from FedEx that a package was on the way from Ludlow, however I believe that was all

>202 Inceptic: Didn't receive a tracking number. Seeing the package today was quite a pleasant surprise.

Just FedEx message for me too. Mine arrived today. Love that leather smell.

I received it today and wow, what a gorgeous book. I love the illustrations and the high quality of their printing as well as the creative ways of inserting them. The printing of the text and the paper are beautiful, though I would prefer it if the pages were less 'empty'. I don't like the huge margins in the lower half here or in a few other titles I have (from other publishers). But that's the only thing that I didn't like 100% - otherwise this is a wonderful edition, a true joy to have. I'm really looking forward to reading it.

>207 SF-72: got it last night, and agree on all counts. I don’t think I have seen colours as vivid in illustrations in a book… The binding is gorgeous too. And very consistent dark inking / printing, superb!

Re very large margins – is it the van de Graaf canon? I understand that it’s supposed to be the golden standard of text layout, but… I’m not sure it works here, particularly when the illustrations are so large and so striking. The text might almost feel secondary to the art.

>208 BorisG:

I feel exactly the same about the colours of the illustrations and what you said about the text.

I don't know about the canon, but from pictures I've seen the margin at the bottom seems rather larger than what I saw there. But I really don't know anything about it, so if anyone here knows more, it would be really interesting to hear their thoughts.

And I just had to think about what you get here for just 85 Pounds more than the latest Folio Society limited edition of 1984 - there's really no comparison. I'd much rather spend that kind of money on something by Areté. You really get a work of art there. I was as happy about the Gaiman / Holmes set and Words of Fire, by the way. The letterpress printing is excellent and where that applies (Words of Fire only has one illustration), they're doing a wonderful job about integrating illustrations into works of literature.

For those who might get interested after the discussions here: I just looked, and the numbered edition is still available and really worth purchasing.

>208 BorisG: "Re very large margins..."

I may be misremembering, but I believe Marcelo said something about wanting the text to feel like it's in a sea of white and to really immerse the reader in the polar feel of the book between that and the oversized illustrations.

>210 NathanOv:

An interesting concept, though it doesn't really work for me.

Let's see what I'll think when I'm reading it, though.

Thank you! >209 SF-72: >210 NathanOv: The text is in a more 'traditional' setting, something that Phil Abel really wanted and I integrated into the designs and yes, as Nathan said, I liked the way that the text feels like the white space in the Arctic and because it is all metal type, I was never really going to know if it all would come together until after we made the book, I am pleased with the way it came out. Greg has done amazing paintings for it, they are really vivid!

>209 SF-72: And I just had to think about what you get here for just 85 Pounds more than the latest Folio Society limited edition of 1984 - there's really no comparison. I'd much rather spend that kind of money on something by Areté. You really get a work of art there.

Yes, fully agreed.

>212 marceloanciano:

Thank you for this information and for this beautiful book! It's such excellent work on all fronts.

>213 Pendrainllwyn: and a few dollars cheaper than the FS 1984 if you live in the US. I'm out of town, but the book arrived and I can't wait to see it when I get home.

I agree with all the praise so far. It's a very impressive and accomplished book. The tabbed-in fold-out pictures work incredibly well. Some of the paintings really are spectacular, and the whole thing makes for a very immersive experience. I'm not sure I can ever go back to looking at artwork disappearing into the gutter of a book again!

One of my favourite aspects of the book is the fold out title page - love the design and it sets the tone beautifully.

My first experience of Liber Charta paper - very nice.

>212 marceloanciano: Thank you to you and the team for creating such a splendid edition.

>216 GardenOfForkingPaths: Thanks! We did the same tabbed in double page foldouts with Oz too, no gutter!

Mine arrived as well and just wanted to add a voice to the choir of praise. A beautiful edition all around.

>193 Ragnaroekk: please do sir. a strong reception so far. I just don't want to pay for overseas shipping

>222 Ragnaroekk: https://www.librarything.com/topic/177029

>222 Ragnaroekk: And if need somewhere to host the pictures, you can put them into your user gallery here on LT. For example: https://www.librarything.com/gallery/member/Shadekeep

I just received mine as well, and wow... what a beautiful book 😊

Groan. Originally, my copy was supposed to be delivered today but, even before the parcel had left Britain, UPS pushed the date back to tomorrow. By now, it still has not even made it to the right country, so I am thinking Monday or Tuesday (allowing 24 hours for customs processing) - the usual story, yadda yadda. Even Folio Society's 2-6 day express service seems to take eight working days these days (with the difference that FedEx usually rushes the package to the final warehouse, where it then, annoyingly, just idles for nearly a week until the scheduled delivery date).

Let's see if this works:











I've put Lyra's Christmas Carol next to it for comparison.
The book looks (and smells) great. I'd guess it's from the solvents used to treat the leather but I'd like to know more from the specialists.

>228 tkellici: What's the font-size of the main text?

>229 Inceptic: 11 point Monotype Baskerville

I received my copy the other day. Love it. The illustrations - content and quality - are top notch. The edition is a winner, and well worth the wait. Kudos to Arete.

Ok, huge fan of the fold-out title page. I’ve never seen that done before, and it looks very cool! You can really feel the snowy isolation.

>234 Ragnaroekk: ohhh ok

>233 curiousbooks: Please define "little." Little in terms of size (book dimensions)? Little in terms of page count? Little in terms of word count? Little used as a puerile pejorative for the novella itself?

>233 curiousbooks: Sorry you feel that way, we are not laughing all the way to the bank, the books that we make are about 85% to 90% of those costs to physically create. That’s if we sell out. The price of hand crafted, letterpress books that take two years to make.

>237 marceloanciano: Just ignore, they’re trolling.

I had a lot of fun reading Frozen Hell over the bank holiday weekend. A very cool, highly immersive reading experience as I suspected it would be. The way Gregory Manchess really gets into the landscapes, characters, and atmosphere of each book he illustrates is so impressive. The design of this edition really supports and showcases that artistic skill; internally it has a very refined, almost stark feel to it, and then you get these incredible explosions of colour and drama.

I took a few pictures - these are only some of the 16 colour plates inside the book. I forgot to take more pics of the black and white illustrations! One thing the pictures can't convey is the lovely aroma this book has (if you like the smell of leather of course). I think it might be the nicest smelling book that I own!

Great stuff from Areté. Superb quality all round.

>239 GardenOfForkingPaths: Thanks for the pictures, that book is really beautiful. The shot from the top showing how the illustrations are inserted in the text block is very interesting, first time I see it done like that.
However I find the margins a bit over the top, to the point of having a negative impact on the esthetic of the book.

>240 David_Mauduit:
I too think I would have preferred a slightly larger font size and correspondingly smaller margins. However I'm very happy with the book, it's a great production.

Has anyone seen a recent update on Benjamin Button?

>243 Ragnaroekk: Thanks!

I thought that their blog on their website was going to have all of the information that was put on social media, but it hasn’t been updated since April

>244 DMulvee:

I really wish they did that. I much prefer it to social media and think such information should be on a publisher's / seller's website.

>243 Ragnaroekk:

Lud-in-the-Mist is one I'm really looking forward to. With Brave New World, I just can't get into the illustrations that have been shown so far. Based on Frozen Hell, I'm sure they will look fantastic when it comes to printing quality, but they just don't work for me, unfortunately. I wish it was otherwise.

>243 Ragnaroekk: Could you share the link? Is it from Facebook? I can't seem to locate the post...

I hope that the mentioned revised design is associated with some minor changes to the front cover of the numbered edition, I wasn't a particular fan of it and would love to purchase this one as I am a keen sucker for Dave McKean's art

That looks absolutely fabulous! Someone who has read both Frozen Hell and Who Goes There? -- what are the biggest differences and do you prefer one over the other?

>247 Ragnaroekk: Ah, I see, thank you:)

As we're talking about the Lyra's Facebook group, for anyone who hasn't seen it check out the most recent post for the absolutely incredible work done by Rich Tong and Marcelo Anciano on a private commission tie-in for Stephen King/Mike Flanagan's The Life of Chuck movie. Limited to 30 copies, none of which are for sale. But wow, that's a holy grail!

Just put up a new blog post about Brave New World if anyone who is not on social media and wants a read: https://arete-editions-blog.com/2024/10/05/2383/

>250 Levin40: That was such a pleasure to work on!

>248 astropi: Frozen Hell has about 15-20% more, Campbell wrote it as Frozen Hell but was too long for the magazine so the editor took out the opening section which was setting up the story more as an adventure showing the finding of the saucer and more character development before the paranoia sets in. The original story was only found a few years ago when the manuscript that was submitted was discovered, revealing his original intentions.

>251 marceloanciano:

Thank you for posting this here, and for the information on Frozen Hell, too. I've got it, and it's a really impressive and beautiful book. You did a wonderful job there.

>251 marceloanciano: I’m looking forward to seeing the final product. The variety of illustration styles is very intriguing.

I can't wait for the update on Benjamin Button as well. Exciting news from Areté

The 2024 BBDPA shortlist is out.

Areté bagged another nomination with Frozen Hell (Numbered Edition), once again in the Best British Book category. Congratulations to Marcelo and the rest of the team - and best of luck for the gala night!

Of the other familiar publishers, Books Illustrated Ltd. picked up one nomination with The Starless Sea (Deluxe Leather Edition) (in the Fine Binding & Limited Edition category), while the Folio Society managed thirteen nominations across seven categories (a new record for them):

Best British Book:
* Nineteen Eighty-Four (LE)

Fine Binding & Limited Edition:
* The Long Way to a Small Angry Planet (LE)

Brand / Series Identity:
* Agatha Christie

Photographic Books:
* The Planets

Literature:
* Gitanjali
* The Night Before Christmas
* The Song of Achilles
* The Underground Railroad

Scholarly, Academic and Reference Books:
* On the Origin of Species (LE)
* Pandaemonium

Best Jacket / Cover Design:
* Iron Curtain
* The Planets
* The Underground Railroad

Obviously, this still does not guarantee a happy gala night - last year, all eleven FS finalists returned home empty-handed.

Marcelo posted the updated designs of the numbered Benjamin Button. I much prefer the new versions and will order one (the hourglass) for myself next month as a Christmas present :)

I have been that the upside down hourglass is deliberate, as time is topsy-turvy in the novel.

>260 wcarter: Yep :)

Great design. I got the one with the question mark / sperm, but both versions involve good / creative ideas.

Hmmm, I liked the old colour scheme. The chocolate brown leather and marbling was really tasteful (not that the new design isn't!) and it subtly hinted at the flashes of colour inside. The sperm design was a bit out there, but I would have welcomed a different image stamped on the old marbled paper. Maybe they tried that and it didn't work.

The new one is very nice, though. I'm sure it will be another lovely book. I'm not complaining, I just had a fondness for the old design.

>264 GardenOfForkingPaths: So existing purchasers weren't offered a choice of the old or new design? I'd assumed this change only applied to new purchasers. The book looks quite nice, though I don't think I need an expensive copy of this story. Looking forward to Lud though.

>265 Levin40: I'm not sure - I haven't ordered yet. I had it firmly on my 'will order sometime soon' list, which is obviously no help to the publisher! I still like the new design and will probably order it. I could have voted with my wallet for the original design when it first came out.

>265 Levin40: You should have an email asking which of the new designs you'd like if you have already purchased a copy. If you are ordering a new copy, you have the choice between the two designs when you order. >264 GardenOfForkingPaths: Dave McKean wasn't keen on the original designs and colours, so Rich changed them and upgraded the materials. I was happy with what they came up with. The interiors is one of the most effective we've done, extraordinary printing in three colours, I feel it's a really elegant book!

>267 marceloanciano: It does look elegant, and knowing that the artist feels the new design is more in tune with their vision certainly adds weight to the change.

>268 GardenOfForkingPaths: Total tangent, but does your user name here have anything to do with the music of Lawrence Casserley? I admit it's a remote possibility, but...

EDIT: Ah, it's more likely from the Borges story, which is very probably where he got the title for his musical piece as well. Nevermind! 😄

>269 Shadekeep: Yes, it’s Borges! If I remember correctly, I was reading Ficciones when I joined here, and ‘The Garden of Forking Paths’ became one of my favourites.

More fine press Borges please!

Looks like Areté has managed to sell a couple more copies of Benjamin Button over the past few days. The original sad beige colour scheme has turned a bit more interesting now. I still have not made the choice between the two versions. I like the tadpole design more, but the other half seems to favour the alternate version for prudish spinsters (and she has promised to pick up the FS Hobbit on Durin's Day - and that may well turn out to be expensive - so there is that to consider...). Which version did you opt for? After the tiny sample of drizzled & SF-72 the ratio seems to be 1:1. I hope Areté will release the numbers produced after this has sold out (obviously, Lyra's ochre/gold Standard Alchemist is a similar case).

>271 supercell: I picked the upside down hourglass.

I went for the hourglass as well. I like the new design (though I liked the old one well enough to pre-order).

>273 BorisG: Me too:)

>271 supercell: FS Hobbit on Durin's Day - and that may well turn out to be expensive.

£600 UK / £690 for Rest of World / $850 for US according to Folio's (probably accidental) disclosure today.

I opted for the hourglass

Hourglass too.

So, prudes have it by 5:1. Interesting to see whether it will be the general acceptability or rarity that eventually drives the second-hand prices of the two variants.

275: The ROW price of £690 (+P&P) sounds really steep. Unfortunately, we already have both Alan Lee LEs (The Wanderer and The Lord of the Rings) in our library, so skipping The Hobbit is not much of an option. And, obviously, FS knows that. It was always clear that the UK price would not be less than £395, which is what The Wanderer cost in 2018, but I was expecting something in the range of £500-550 for UK - and since our VAT remains, for a while, at 10 %, the 15 % ROW premium FS now charges also adds an extra £30 to the total.

I really like the design but the price is really hard to justify. How do rights work with Arete? Is it similar to other publishers? For example, if one buys Benjamin Button do they get first crack at Brave New World? Or are the releases mostly free-for-alls?

279: Areté editions tend to be rather expensive, but in their defence it needs to be said that their books are lavishly illustrated: whereas a standard Folio edition normally features just 6-8 illustrations, Benjamin Button (a short story of 72 pages) contains 17 prints. Also, what is not instantly obvious from the photographs is that this actually is an oversized book - with slipcase, it will stand around 11.5" tall.

>278 supercell: £395 now seems like a bargain given that the Wanderer now seems to be around £1500 on the secondary market. The Hobbit LE released today was already on sale online for double the sale price minutes after it sold out & i’m sure FS are well aware of the secondary prices & would rather keep a larger chunk for themselves instead of handing it over to the secondary market by pricing more cheaply.

>280 Ragnaroekk: Thinking of changing that.

>283 marceloanciano:

I'm frankly grateful that people who are interested can buy any of your books and nobody feels pressured to buy something they don't really appreciate to not lose rights, while others can't get it from you due to people like that buying. It's clearly what's going on with some other publishers and to me that's really not how this should work. Just my personal thoughts, the decisions are entirely yours, naturally.

I received my copy of Benjamin Button today and it's gorgeous quality all around. I appreciate the high number of illustrations, although I must say that McKean has used a style that I like less than that in other recent books illustrated by him. Still, it's not unusual for him, I just prefer a slightly different direction he's also doing. That being said, the quality and the printing with a small number of colours is excellent and fascinating. And I can imagine that this style of illustration works better with this than the one for the illustrations he has done for Folio Society in recent years. Gorgeous marbled paper and cloth-bound slipcase, beautiful print quality. As has been said, this is also a large volume. I'm very happy with my purchase and it's well worth the price for what you get. I can't wait for Lud-in-the-Mist.

>283 marceloanciano: If you do, will you take previous purchases from the press into consideration?

>286 Dr.Fiddy: That's my idea, ask everyone who has purchased books if they want the next and give them a patron's discount of say, 10%, and then work out a limitation. A way of rewarding their patronage. Still contemplating the idea.

>287 marceloanciano: I've always thought that press subscriptions that reward loyalty are a much better solution than rights systems that are built around exclusivity more than anything else.

>287 marceloanciano: That sounds like a great idea, both from the press’ side and from the collectors’ side.

>285 SF-72: Did you receive any tracking notice? I haven’t heard anything (or received the book), and a previous delivery Arete sent to me was left stranded at a sorting office.

>287 marceloanciano: I'd love that.

>291 DMulvee: I received an InXpress email with a Fedex shipping tracking number a few days before the book was delivered.

>287 marceloanciano: I like that idea a lot, Marcello. It would also be nice if the releases of Lud-in-the-Mist and Brave New World are announced with some time distance.

>289 NathanOv: What’s the practical difference between the two things you mentioned?

In fact, if customers have an exclusive access to purchase an item from a press (the latter example you gave), isn’t that already a reward? Why bother granting them a discount?

>291 DMulvee:

I received an email from FedEx, with whom I have an account. So I don't know if they sent those out in general or to known customers. Without reading on here that the shipping of Benjamin Button started, I wouldn't have known what the parcel contained, though. It's really helpful to get a short notice from whoever is sending a book instead of just from the shipping company.

>293 tkellici: >296 SF-72: Thanks!

The 2024 BBDPA winners were announced yesterday. Another disappointment for Areté, since the Best British Book category went to the Folio Society (Nineteen Eighty-Four). Not sure what the judges saw there since I could not even be bothered to pick it up at 50 % off in the New Year Sale, but it also won the Book of the Year title. The Folio Society also took three other titles, in Photographic Books (The Planets), Scholarly, Academic and Reference Books (On the Origin of Species (LE)) and Best Jacket / Cover Design (The Underground Railroad), yet failed to win Literature despite having four books on the shortlist - just like last year. The quintessential Fine Binding & Limited Edition category went to Books Illustrated Ltd with The Starless Sea (Deluxe Leather Edition).

>298 supercell: I like Folio Society quite a lot but that edition of 1984 had no place winning against the competition

Areté have been in deep slumber for good three months (or so) - but they finally seem to be coming to: an interesting clip about Brave New World has just been added to Areté's Facebook page.

>300 supercell: I wasn't too sure about the art for this book before, but this looks great and much more varied. Still not sure if it's a 'must buy' yet, but I'll keep a close eye on it.

>301 Levin40: I do hope this edition won't turn into a vanity 'work of art' project at $1000 a pop for a standard edition with no futuristic vision of the world, its population and challenges, but rather mostly images resembling '1920-30s' besuited men and cleavaged women gallivanting in clubs; and $50 per volume spent on countless images of pills that appear whenever soma drug gets mentioned...

Rumor has it that in the spirit of Folio Society (tongue in cheek of course), Allen Jones suggested a soma themed low-cut pajamas, but that would have taken the project over the budget ;P.

>300 supercell: Yeah, sometimes crisis and tragedies in life takes over and at the same time I had to work on production and design for The Alchemist, Brave New World, Hitchhikers and a project that Rich will be announcing soon. Oh and Camilla, so social media just didn’t find its time. I’ve put our FB posts on the blog for anyone not on FB or Instagram.

Just added some teaser pics that was on social media onto the blog https://arete-editions-blog.com/ for those not on FB!

>304 marceloanciano:

Thanks for making these available beyond Facebook. An author just shared that they used a huge number of pirated books to feed their AI illegally and I'd really rather not support such a company.

>305 SF-72: Add to an enormous list of bad ethics at Meta. Then, there's Zuck.

Edit: But on topic, I'm excited for this book!

>304 marceloanciano: Looks great! Looking forward to this one.

I really want to like it, but I’m a bit on the fence after seeing the teaser photos… Will wait to see the full reveal before deciding, I think.

How do people feel about these sneak peeks?

I’ve never bought from Arete before and not sure if what’s on the website covers everything - do they ever produce a standard state of their books?

308: Well, for me Brave New World has always been the biggest question mark among Areté's future releases. I do like the bits shown in the teasers, though: the white leather cover of the numbered looks pretty neat (not so taken by the brightly coloured lettered, but as there is no way I could afford it, anyway (shrugs)...). Also, the sequence of illustrations with cutouts is really innovative. However, since Putler's bitch in Oval Office just wiped a couple of grand off my balance sheet, I do need to see the pricing - along with additional details - before making up my mind.

309: That's all, folks! The closest to a standard state have been the Fine Edition of The Case of Death and Honey (500 copies @£95), The Adventure of the Creeping Man (single state of 500 copies @£90) and the Numbered Edition of Words of Fire (300 copies @£65).

Put a blog up with info about Brave new world and also our rights issue! https://arete-editions-blog.com/2025/05/06/numbered-edition-of-brave-new-world-a...

>312 marceloanciano: I'm very excited for Brave New World. It looks fantastic!

That white goat skin binding with the added artwork looks absolutely beautiful

>315 NovelNexus: So people have to buy every publication to stay on the rights track ?
-If you want to purchase the next book you keep your rights, it works the same way as Rich and Lyra Books. As we are the same team it made sense to keep the patronage the same.

Everyone that buys a book from you has the opportunity to pre-order and match numbers ?
-Correct.

If one has rights, will he/she be contacted before 24.5 for Brave New World ?
-If one registers an interest in becoming a rights holder, which they will be offered if they have supported the press by previously buying one of our lettered/Roman or numbered books and they then choose to continue by pre-ordering the next book, they will retain those rights and numbers. They will have a private window of about two weeks to purchase.

Hope that is clear!

Received my members invite and I'm a little confused. As I understand it there is no point in signing up unless one is committed to purchasing Brave New World, although that's not stated. This is a shame as I don't think I'll be purchasing this edition - I'm just not a fan of the novel, even if the treatment looks interesting. I would, however, be very interested in purchasing Lud in the Mist if that's next. Anyway, so it goes.

>317 Levin40: Aye, this kind of scheme isn't my cuppa either. I do enjoy Brave New World but don't need this version of it. I'm very keen on Lud in the Mist however, and am hoping there will be a chance to pick it up outside the rights cycle. I would imagine so, most publishers seem to set the limitation beyond the membership number.

EDIT: Ah, just received an invite myself. Went ahead and signed up, though no plans to buy the current book. So not sure it's doing any good to enroll.

>318 Shadekeep: most publishers seem to set the limitation beyond the membership number.

Yes. Their email did state "As well as Patrons' copies, there will be additional copies available for general sale on the usual first-come, first-served basis."

Excitedly awaiting the public offer! A little relieved a few of you are passing!

>318 Shadekeep: Yes, I think this should have been clearer, meaning that they should have stated their assumption that those who sign up intend to purchase Brave New World (unless I'm missing something). Because, reading between the lines, it sounds as though they're using the number of sign-ups to set the limitation for Brave New World, at least in part. So it seems that there is an unspoken assumption here.

Hmm. Also got an invite. Not sure if I should have proceeded, though, since the link took me to a page titled: "First-tier Patron registration" - in my case, second-tier would have been far more appropriate. I hope they have their levels sorted out. ;^)

>319 Pendrainllwyn: Excellent, thanks!

>321 Levin40: Ach, I hope I didn't screw up their numbers then by accepting the invite. It would be good to get further clarity from them on this, maybe to head off others from making the same move as I did.

EDIT: >322 supercell: Mine was First-Tier too, which I thought odd as well. I'm guessing it comes from buying Frozen Hell, but I didn't get the tippy-top level there. Perhaps they are being generous on the initial invitations?

I'm on the fence for brave new world, but lud is a definite purchase. Do we know if Lud is next after brave new world?

I also want Lud but not Brave New World, and am frustrated that after supporting every single release so far, I'll basically be kicked out the door now. At least that's what it feels like. But I can't afford to spend that much money on a book I really don't want - I've got an issue with dystopias these days. I do hope I'll be able to buy Lud in the Mist despite that. Suffice it to say, I appreciated the fact that they didn't work with rights until now, and those make complete sense to me for series, but not for every single title by a publisher.

Got my invite and signed up. I’m really looking forward to Brave New World and whatever comes next. Areté has become one of my absolute favourite presses...

>322 supercell:
>323 Shadekeep:

I queried this as I should be 2nd tier too (from buying the numbered Frozen Hell). Phil confirmed that I’m registered as 2nd tier. The heading on the registration page was incorrect.

>327 GardenOfForkingPaths: Thanks for the confirmation. I can log in with the new account but don't yet see a place to view my member profile. Possibly still in the works.

>329 LT79:

True, in addition to personal problems that add to my really not needing more negativity of this type in my life. I liked reading dystopias in my 20s, but now I'm repulsed by them. Just the news is more than enough of that these days.

>330 SF-72: Totally empathise too. Shamelessly seeking escapism in books…

I’m on the fence re Brave New World. I could deal with it being a dystopia, but I’m not sure I like the art… (which I did like very much in all previous Arete releases)

>325 SF-72: I also want Lud but not Brave New World, and am frustrated that after supporting every single release so far, I'll basically be kicked out the door now.

I understand your frustration. The rights system is harsh in demanding complete loyalty. Anyway, maybe you are fretting unnecessarily. Rights systems are only problematic for non-rights holders if the books sell out. Neither Benjamin Button or Frozen Hell have sold out and maybe Brave New World and Lud in the Mist will not either.

I think it was a smart move from Areté to introduce the rights system at this point. It is well known that Lud will be a popular title whereas Brave New World likely will not be. It is in Areté's interest to set the number of rights on a sustainable level. If implementation had been attempted with Lud, the numbers would almost certainly be set too high - and it is the Benjamin Buttons and Frozen Hells that need the support of regular patrons, not the Luds. The rights system also projects some of Lud's popularity to Brave New World as there, no doubt, will be people who are keen to secure a copy of Lud at this point (which, of course, is the main benefit of this system for rights-holders).

Myself, I have purchased all four Areté's second-tier titles (Roman Words of Fire is pretty rare, so not many others can say the same). While Brave New World perhaps is not the most exciting title, the white goat-skin binding is pretty neat, the book appears to be profusely illustrated and the mid-section sequence may well win Areté its first BBDPA title (as their judges seem partial for cutouts). Also, the price was not extortionate. So, I have no qualms picking it up along the way to Lud.

I for one very much want both titles: Brave New World and Lud, and am very much looking forward to both. While 1984 is the greater dystopian novel of the two, the modern dystopian reality is an unholy matrimony of surveillance and soma.

I had never heard of Lud until reading this. Seems like a somewhat peripheral work of some influence; perhaps a transitional novel. Anyway, BNW, despite playing second fiddle to 1984, is still a foundational text of general cultural import and I don't seem to understand why folks seem to think BNW will not be as popular or sell as well as Lud. Am I missing something?

>336 chase.donaldson: "Am I missing something?"

My interpretation is that Lud is a somewhat obscure work of fantasy with a rich mythic grounding while Brave New World suffers (relatively speaking) from the "high school English class assignment" curse despite being influential and having some genuinely precocious insights.

>336 chase.donaldson:

I think one aspect is that there are already nice editions of Brave New World - the reason why a friend of mine doesn't want the one by Arete, while Lud in the Mist doesn't have one to my knowledge.

>338 SF-72: what other treatments has BNV gotten? I can only think of LEC

>338 SF-72:

"There are already nice editions of Brave New World."

I believe that is incorrect. The only letterpress edition is an LEC edition (Limited Editions Club) published in 1974 several decades after George Macy's death. The LEC was being managed by the family and it was in a death spiral with increasingly unattractive editions - and their edition of BNW is not an attractive effort. In fact, the reason the Areté Editions BNW is appealing is because it fills a distinct void. For a novel of this historical importance there are currently no attractive fine or private press editions, and I am excluding the likes of Easton Press, Franklin Library, etc.

>339 chase.donaldson:
>340 dlphcoracl:

I don't count only letterpress as nice editions. To me, that's actually a minor aspect, but to each their own. I know it's the main factor for others here. In my case, illustrations would be a very important aspect, and in this regard I find some for Arete's edition interesting (the set leading into the village), but am otherwise disappointed that it concentrates so much on people as opposed to the world of the book. Again, that's a matter of personal taste.

As for your questions: If I remember it correctly, the friend I mentioned has the edition by Folio Society (not letterpress, but she's happy enough with it), and there are also leather-bound editions, for example by publishers you / dlphcoracl excluded from your list. (I vaguely remember someone mentioning that another fine press edition was also planned, but I really can't confirm that anymore.)

Lud in the Mist doesn't have anything of the sort, the best one can hope for so far are mass market editions there. So I would imagine that at least in this regard, Lud in the Mist might attract more interest because there is no alternative based on one's tastes. Of course, general popularity might be another factor where Brave New World may or may not do better. I really wouldn't want to guess.

Brave New World editions (afaik):
1971 Folio Society (ill: Leonard Rosoman)
1974 Limited Editions Club (ill: Mara McAfee) Limited to 2000 copies. True fine edition.
1976 Heritage Press reprint of the LEC
1978 Easton Press reprint of the same (leatherbound)
2013 Folio Society (ill: Finn Dean)

Perhaps also worth noting Franklin Library had a book with his stories in 1981 that doesn't include BNW, but only has the author's name on the spine so might cause some confusion as far as leatherbound editions go.

ETA: I mis-read the email. Sorry!

Numbered Edition ordered 😊

This was also a no-brainer numbered purchase for me. BNW is an incredible work and the amount of art put into the production is worth the price of admission alone.

I’m in for the numbered. 😀

So shipping from Arete to the USA and Canada is 67 pounds now?

Just had another book sent from UK to Australia and the postage charge was £65! Shipping costs are becoming prohibitive.

How much is the numbered?

>349 Inceptic:
£530

Easy pass for me. It does remind me of LEC's Ulysses where Matisse famously never read the book. Here Allen Jones cannibalized his own, mostly forgotten, portfolio inserting variants of 'One Night Only,' 'Fascinating Rhythm,' 'Second Thoughts,' 'I Got You Babe' and other works into the book. A couple of apparently original illustrations are nothing to incentivize me to purchase this edition despite intriguing binding work by Rich.

I was hoping that one day we could see Brave New World from Rich in the spirit of his BNW rebound. However; as Arete's and Lyra's are a team this is highly unlikely, so my hope now rests with CTP, Amarantine's or another fine press dark horse to properly honor Huxley's classic... (preferably at below $500 for standard :D).

No limitation for these books has been set?

>351 EPsonNY: " Here Allen Jones cannibalized his own, mostly forgotten, portfolio inserting variants of 'One Night Only,' 'Fascinating Rhythm,' 'Second Thoughts,' 'I Got You Babe' and other works into the book. A couple of apparently original illustrations are nothing to incentivize me to purchase this edition despite intriguing binding work by Rich"

That’s very insightful, I appreciate you bringing it up!

>351 EPsonNY: Can you explain the cannibalization of Allen Jones' prior works? How did you find this?

Interesting interview about Areté's Brave New World by The Collectible Book Vault:

Brave New World by Areté Editions

>355 chase.donaldson: Try googling Allen Jones and switch to images to view random examples of his work. Then you may visit some of the galleries or resellers of his work to get a glimpse of his creations. He seems to have used variations of his previous imagery to insert into the book with minor tweaks rather than actually illustrating the book's themes, messages, characters, events etc.

It reminds me a bit of Matisse, though not as flagrant, since he never read Ulysses and drew whatever he wanted to meet his contractual obligation. I can imagine Allen Jones could recycle his art to fit Fountainhead, or Atlas Shrugged, but illustrating a book to me means using your talent as artist and your unique style to create original work from scratch; to interpret concepts, ideas, events in the literary work; to tease or help readers' imagination, but not to dust off your old work, mix it up or copy and paste verbatim, and call it a day...

This book may end up being an homage Allen Jones pay to himself and his work only, not to Huxley, not to the ideas behind the book and not to the reader...

>351 EPsonNY: >354 drizzled: I'm undecided on this work, but I'm having trouble finding artwork shared by Arete that matches any of those previous Allen Jones works you mentioned.

>357 EPsonNY: There is one image I chose from Allen's previous work, all of the rest of the book is original works drawn and created for Aldous Huxley

>359 NovelNexus: Allen and the artist Leslie Gerry spent many months working on the images and prints for the book, nearly a year's work. They all look like Allen's work! Just like Charlie Vess's work or Gary or Greg. Each has their style I think. And as you say, you respond to their style...or you don't. But they all have a visual voice.

>361 marceloanciano: It looks awesome to me!

I've ordered a numbered. I really appreciate the time and effort that is obviously put into Arete's editions. Frozen Hell beat my expectations and I think Brave New World looks great (I'm also very much looking forward to what comes next, Lud in particular).

The only thing that gave me a little pause was the paper choice, I'd liked the liber charta in Frozen Hell so was a bit sad not to see it used for this one (numbered).

I’ve had my eye on frozen hell for a while but haven’t pulled the trigger, if I buy it now will I be added to the rights system for brave new world (which I would also like)?

>364 anthonyfawkes: The deadline to register as a patron was 8pm UK time on May 18th so you've missed that.

There's a reasonable chance some numbered books remain unsold come the public sale which starts 5pm May 31st.

Thanks, I sent them a message anyway just in case and they confirmed the same. They also confirmed that rights from the sale of extra copies on the 31st will be based on a lottery. Shame I missed the chance but it also means I don't have to rush to purchase frozen hell and can wait for quieter book buying months.

I did sign up for newsletters from arete last year sometime but I've never received anything from them, did anyone else? Having some direct communication from them about this new system would have been welcome.

So what is the consensus on whether there will be a reasonable number of copies of the second tier for the public sale? Their email at the beginning of the month didn't say anything about a lottery for the public sale.

If anyone bought a pre-sale for patrons only to secure their chance to get the Lud and doesn't really want it, let me know and I can buy it off you so you keep your place for Lud but don't have to keep this book.

>367 chase.donaldson: sorry to be clear they said lottery is just for the rights not the book.

>367 chase.donaldson: Sent you a message

>368 anthonyfawkes: Ok, so that means that they have changed how rights will be handled. On their Rights FAQ it says: "They will be offered to buyers of the latest title available at the time on a first-come, first-served basis."

This is all a bit confusing.

>371 What_What: Everyone who has purchased our previous books, first and second tier, have been contacted (and if they haven't been contacted, drop us an email) and offered the right to become a patron rights holder of our books. When the patrons pre-order closes at 5pm UK time 30th may, the number of copies sold to patrons will be the number of rights for both states. there will be copies of both states available first come first served for public pre-sale, the public pre-sales will be 5pm UK time on the 31st of may. Hope that is clear!

>372 marceloanciano: sorry that’s not made it more clear.

Are you saying that there will be no rights at all with the public pre-sale on the 31st?

>373 anthonyfawkes: My understanding is that Arete have introduced "Patron Rights". I haven't read mention of any other form of rights. Two sets of rights running in tandem would be confusing! So, my reading is that there will be no rights at all with the public pre-sale on the 31st.

The key sentence in post 372 is "When the patrons pre-order closes at 5pm UK time 30th may, the number of copies sold to patrons will be the number of rights for both states." I don't see Arete adding to the number of rights after that. Indeed, the email sent to previous buyers of first or second tier editions also stated "The number of Patrons we have when registration closes at 8pm UK time on 18 May will remain unchanged from then on, and rights will only become available should a Patron forfeit theirs by not to taking a particular title. Those rights would be offered to buyers of the latest edition on sale at the time." So people have a chance to acquire Patron Rights if an existing Patron forfeits.

>372 marceloanciano: Thank you.

>374 Pendrainllwyn: “So people have a chance to acquire Patron Rights if an existing Patron forfeits.” No doubt by lottery. ;)

>363 EdmundRodriguez: the paper’s had me wavering on this one. Set against many offerings (Suntup for example) it’s perfectly good, and at a weight that is welcome - the same as Coraline, both standard and numbered. Liber and Superfine both have 25% cotton content I believe? Setting this ponder aside, I think it looks to be a fantastic production and most certainly ticks every other box - the solander being a very welcome addition - especially when using white leather.

>374 Pendrainllwyn: >376 Chemren: >373 anthonyfawkes: After talking to Phil about this thread we are thinking about putting some rights up for the public pre-sale, probably be a first come first served.

>378 marceloanciano: I kind of anticipated this since it is rather more convenient to have a nice round number of rights instead of an arbitrary figure (also, a slightly larger number of rights would allow a bit more turnover among core clientele).

Anyway, one week of Patrons' pre-order left, and 17/35 = 48.6% of first-tier rights and 91/188 = 48.4 % of second-tier rights have been taken up. Obviously, some registered patrons may not have paid enough attention to how the rights work and end up bailing out at this point, but there are also some good reasons to delay purchase (e.g., credit card cycles). So, it will be very interesting to see what the final tally will be.

>378 marceloanciano: music to my eyes

>378 marceloanciano:

What's important to me is that, in contrast to Lyra's with their rights or lottery only system, future books will still be reliably available in a public sale to people who don't buy Brave New World, in my case because I just don't have the money to spend about 600 Pounds (with shipping and import tax) on a book that I know I won't enjoy at all because it's a dystopia.

Ordered! Curious to see how many patrons have been created by the end of today :)

Quoting recent email:

The limitation of the Roman Edition will be thirty copies. Twenty-five of them are reserved for Patron's Rights holders, and five will be available for non-Patrons tomorrow. All purchases of the Roman Edition in the public pre-sale will confer Patron's Rights and there will be 30 rights holders for all our future first-tier publications.

The limitation of the Numbered Edition will be 225 copies. 139 of them are reserved for holders of Patron's Rights, and 86 will be available for non-Patrons tomorrow. The first eleven purchases of the Numbered Edition will confer Patron's Rights, and there will be 150 rights holders for all our future second-tier publications.

>383 abysswalker: So, 73.9 % retention rate for the numbered, plus additional 11 rights copies to reach the current gold standard of 150 rights holders, and 71.4 % for the Roman, plus 5 extras (I guess they could have gone with just one extra and called it Lettered). A healthy number of non-rights numbered copies, as well, which should help avoid those mad dash to the finish line in under a minute scenarios that plague CTP these days (of course, that issue is partly/largely caused by copies being sold through two channels).

All 5 Roman copies sold, and over a half of the available numbered copies in just over an hour. 41 numbered still remaining.

I got my order in, including frozen hell at 4:59 and when my page refreshed the counter was down 10 copies so fingers crossed I was fast enough to secure patrons rights. If not still looking forward to two beautiful new books in my collection

I got mine in for the numbered pretty promptly. Glad to see the numbers ticking steadily down for them (36 now). I’m not a rights pursuer in general, but I’ve had this edition on my wishlist ever since it was announced and I’m delighted it’s all come together now.

Down to 29 now, i.e., 196 Numbered (plus all 30 Roman) copies of Brave New World sold. It might take a while to sell the rest but Marcelo has good reason to be happy about the outcome, particularly since all this seems to have helped clear some old stock, as well.

>388 supercell: Yeah really happy!! We can start on our next project, probably be a three slim volume set in one case! Yay!

>389 marceloanciano: Is that a Robert E Howard collection?

I assume Lud will be the next edition to be released?

>390 EdmundRodriguez: Lud will be the next book, probably before the end of the year, the next project to put together will be a three volume set for late next year. It won't be Howard yet, I have a Conan story nearly ready to go sometime, but I won't be doing complete books - I have already done that with Wandering Star. Most of the versions I did then I'm still pretty happy with. Although enlarging some of the stories is quite exciting, but I'd like them to have a different kind of reading experience. We'll be announcing the set soon.

>391 marceloanciano: Exciting stuff. Looking forward to it all!

Down to five - I bought at 6 having forfeited rights because of prevarication. This is a bold and striking take on a great work, I’ve faith it’ll prove a delight.

One of the more remarkable aspects of this edition (present in all states), which I don't think I've seen mentioned here yet, is the multipage illustration progression meant to represent one of the narrative transitions in the story. This uses cutouts in an attractive and innovative way.

You can see a video clip of the effect in this Instagram post from the press:

https://www.instagram.com/p/DKUvJOSpehc/?img_index=5

(In case the img_index directive doesn't take you there directly, it's the fifth piece of media in the post.)

For anyone worried about Jones Picassoing up the illustrations, this should provide some preemptive partial comfort.

Personally, the forms and anatomy he uses are sometimes hit or miss for me, but the compositions are all pleasing and I adore the intense color combinations.

While I think this take illustration-wise is solid conceptually (kind of a jazz age vibe), there's a potential resonance with contemporary hedonism that remains an unmet opportunity, I think, for some daring artisan. We have soma, in both the upper and downer varieties, from our current psychiatric-industrial complex, and various rave and festival subcultures (just for one example) provides us with our own orgy-porgy. To do this justice (and make the relevance impossible to ignore), an edition should be downright pornographic. I'd tap an artist like Steven Klein (see Gaga's Alejandro music video) or the photographer Rick Day. Interestingly, Huxley was wrong in assuming the authoritarian megastates would use sex in the way depicted in the novel (empirically, they have tended toward fascistic Puritanism in their various German, Soviet, and Maoist varieties).

>394 cottonoverwood: ... and gone! The last ten copies did not last long.

>391 marceloanciano: Thanks for the update. It sounds really great :) And, btw, congrats with the sellout of BNW!

>398 LT79: Re: use of sex by authoritarian states, I have to agree here. There are two models in which ostensibly free, open societies can employee this as a means of control.

One is the commodification of sex in the marketplace. You are encouraged to feel that it's never enough sex (in quantity and quality), pushing you to pursue more, as well as seek the appurtenances (wealth, fame, fashion, etc) that will enable you to obtain it. Basically another manufacture-of-discontent model. This is essentially what you see in "late capitalism" models now.

The other is the use of sex (along with drugs and other hedonistic elements) to produce a docile populace of lotus-eaters. This is the premise of BNW as well as films like Logan's Run. Examples of this sort are typically small-scale and isolated (cults and so forth), because this approach doesn't survive contact with an outer world operating on other models. The Machiavellian dictum of it being better to be feared than loved (if you can't have both) applies here, and states have discovered it's easier to ride herd on a fractious populace than maintain a contented one.

>398 LT79: That's the whole point. It doesn't feel authoritarian like the boot on the face.

So much that keeps me wondering which side I’d have preferred to land on.

>395 abysswalker: >399 Shadekeep: Really enjoy reading such discussions.

This is a beautiful edition. Although I didn't purchase it, I hope that those who did will be quite pleased with the book. While 1984 has likely had more cultural significance, it's quite clear that Huxley was far more prescient than Orwell. From Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman:

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions". In 1984, Huxley added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us.

>400 LT79: There are some differences in BNW from the lotus-eater model, to be sure. The implementation of a caste system being the biggest deviation. In this way we are presented with an eugenic meritocracy, where one's position in society isn't just ordained by birth, but justified by it. This has parallels ranging from hereditary bloodline dynasties right up to the American class system. Coupled with the derision aimed at the Savages and the glorification of the means of mass production, one could argue that BNW is more strongly in the model of a "late capitalism" dystopia instead. It certainly resonates in the way that >403 jbrnewman: has pointed out.

>403 jbrnewman: I don't know that there's a dichotomy between the two. As we can see playing on multiple theatres right now it's perfectly possible to combine apathy and ignorance with a boot to the face style of oppression. If anything they're a happy symbiosis strengthening each other.

>405 A.Godhelm: >406 LT79: If I can be allowed to conflate Adam Smith with Napoleon, rather than employing a boot it's a case of ruling with "an invisible hand in a velvet glove" - the mechanism of control made innately desirable and pleasing to the touch.

Of course the reality is that humans have a long history of totalitarian governance, each controlling group longing for the amount of control Orwell described, but none of the type that Huxley described, even if privileged westerners want to feel sad about a tyranny of hedonism.

>409 LT79: there is of course a broader political or philosophical discussion to be had, but in terms of BNW, the fear is very much of a centralized, authoritarian, enforced, eugenic vision. There is one government enforced approach sweetened by pharmacology and sex.

The concern you raise, shared by Buddhists and some other philosophical traditions (Stoicism probably most clearly, but also some forms of monastic-influenced Christianity) are a struggle with the self, not external oppression.

Personally, I think there very much is a dichotomy, and to compare the dangers to human flourishing entailed in true fascistic totalitarianism (Stalin, NAZI, or DPRK-style) is to engage in a tremendous lack of perspective.

Huxley was prescient in terms of within-society concerns (yes, it would probably facilitate greater flourishing if people spent less time being seduced by various hedonic or distracting indulgences) but missed the boat on the greater risks of 1984 style totalitarianism.

This may change at some point with improving technology, Gattaca-style, or yet to be seen political ideologies, but those seem pretty far off in terms of immediate effects and risks to freedom and flourishing.

>410 abysswalker: but also some forms of monastic-influenced Christianity

Notably the Anchorite orders come to mind here. They could be said to rival the Buddhists in asceticism and the directing of the moral battle inward.

>409 LT79: Of course. I'm a Buddhist. But Huxley is writing about systems of control via hedonism, not of individual liberation. And I don't see systems of control based on hedonism in history, while I do see lots of attempts at total hegemony through force, fear and propaganda. What got me on the subject was the OPs comment that Huxley's work was more relevant today than Orwell's. And that simply isn't true in the slightest.

As an aside, I don't particularly care for either books, although I think Orwell's is the more astute. YMMV.

>411 Shadekeep: Buddhism is not an ascetic religion. The Buddha states in a number of the earliest works that asceticism is not the path to nibbana (nirvana in sk). Siddhartha practiced asceticism in the extreme and it did not work, so he rejected it.

>413 Cardboard_killer: Fair dues. I should have said "correspondingly ascetic Buddhist sects", rather than applying it to the whole religion. There are such sects and they sometimes loom large in the Western imagination, as the extremes of any faith might. You are perfectly correct that the core tenets do not advocate asceticism and view it as a path as false as the pursuit of hedonism.

I just finished Dream Hotel, a dystopian novel of near-future California.

It gave me the creeps, was an extremely uncomfortable read, and correctly identifies the tech we can no longer live without as the source of our panopticon experience.

Edited for correct touchstone

My copy of frozen hell arrived today and it is a sumptuous book, the leather is so soft I’m afraid to hold it for too long in case I hurt it. The bite on some of the letterpress is very tactile which I love and the artwork is copious and gorgeous.

I’ve not had a book before where the prints are tipped in leaving about an inch of the paper between other pages, I’m assuming this is done on purpose for stability?

>418 anthonyfawkes: "prints are tipped in leaving about an inch of the paper between other pages"

It's so the prints can lay flat! It's a method Rich developed specifically for this book, but I believe has been using on other volumes since then.

Exciting news today:

Coming next: Lud-in-the-Mist
For the last three years, as well as working on Brave New World, we have been planning our next publication, Lud-in-the-Mist, by Hope Mirrlees. Our edition will mark the centenary of its first publication in 1926.

Lud-in-the-Mist is a fantastic tale of repression, illicit drugs and fairies. Although largely forgotten for many years, its importance is now widely recognised among modern authors and readers of fantasy and science fiction.

We have commissioned Scott McKowen to make thirty-two full-page, letterpress illustrations, and he is now working with Richard Tong on binding designs. Graphic designer Milton Glaser, famous for the I Love New York logo, described Scott as “one of the great illustrators of our time.”

All being well, it will be available for pre-sale next spring.

Also forthcoming: A Princess of Mars
We’ve also started work on A Princess of Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs. Burroughs's Mars books were vital influences on the mid-twentieth century science fiction. Frank Herbert absolutely adored them as a young man. Arthur C. Clarke, George Lucas, Michael Moorcock, Leigh Brackett, Olaf Stapledon, Robert Heinlein, Edmond Hamilton, Philip Jose Farmer and Ray Bradbury were all captivated by them. Bradbury once wrote that "Edgar Rice Burroughs is my father.”

Film maker James Cameron mentioned the influence of A Princess of Mars on his science-fiction epic Avatar in The New Yorker magazine.

For two decades, a map of Mars as imagined by Burroughs hung in the hallway outside Carl Sagan's office in Cornell University.

Ours will be the first ever fine press edition of this landmark book.

It will be illustrated by Gary Gianni, who will be producing twelve tipped-in full-colour plates and more than twenty full-page black and white letterpress plates. As you can see from Gary's sketches, it promises to be an extraordinary book.

Brave New World
Meanwhile, work continues on the production of Brave New World. It will be printed this autumn and we expect to deliver in the first quarter of next year.

>420 Dr.Fiddy: Great titles and wonderful matching of illustrator to project. Lud-In-The-Mist is airy, delicate, and strange; Scott McKowen's a fine choice. A Princess of Mars is wild and woolly. Gianni will no doubt turn in excellent work.

I've resisted purchasing Arete titles until now (although I have been tempted). But these will be irresistible.

>421 Shotcaller: Resistance is futile! These will be classics.

>422 SDB2012: I bet you're right.

>424 NovelNexus: I agree. Thoughtful title choices and fantastic art and design. Brave New World doesn't make my top fifty novel list, but I can't imagine a better design or choice or artist.

>424 NovelNexus: I had not heard about this, but I’m curious to hear what the justification was for three volumes? The three sections of the books are not terribly balanced nor quite long enough to justify splitting.

>426 NathanOv: We had originally planned on doing the first edition, 1818 version, of Frankenstein but was pipped to the post by Morning Bell. The very first edition of the story was printed in three volumes, it's extremely rare. We wanted to follow those volumes. If I could remember how to post images I'd post photos but if you google I'm sure you would find examples, there was only 500 copies made. Here's a photo; https://images.barrons.com/im-394767?width=700&size=1.5005861664712778 The last copy at auction fetched 1.17 million!

>427 marceloanciano: Ah, that makes sense! While I plan on buying Morning Bell's addition, based on the general reception to it here I imagine you'd have no problem still finding buyers.

>427 marceloanciano: I'm planning to buy Morning Bell's edition, but I'll buy your edition as well if you decide to do it :)

>428 NathanOv: >429 Dr.Fiddy: Thanks!

>428 NathanOv: >429 Dr.Fiddy: Thanks!

IMO lots of newer Frankensteins, none done particularly well or definitiviely. An opportunity for a superlative one.

>432 chase.donaldson: I couldn’t agree more.

>427 marceloanciano: Who would have been the illustrator, if you can share?

>434 What_What: Greg Manchess. He was gutted when we postponed the book. He had done months of research...

>435 marceloanciano: That’s really too bad. I’d still buy it myself - will not be getting the Morning Bell edition due to the art.

>436 What_What: me too, for what it’s worth.

>436 What_What: echoing the sentiment of others - would also buy the Areté edition (especially with Manchess) as passing on Morning Bell

>435 marceloanciano: Count me in with the others who would prefer an Arête Frankenstein over Morning Bell's.

Rambler Press out of Warsaw did a three volume Frankenstein that looks great, but afaik it doesn't have any illustrations.
https://ramblerpress.com/products/frankenstein-or-the-modern-prometheus-shelley

>441 JanPospisilCZ: Wow, those are so handsome! While they don't seem to be letterpress (even their book on Caslon mentions the use of digital type), they are fine looking works and overall hand-crafted. I think I'll need to add them to the fine press bibliography. Thanks for sharing!

>441 JanPospisilCZ: Do you have any experience with Ramber Press? I have found them some time ago, but the production details of the books on their website is quite sparse.

>443 c_schelle: Sorry, I do not. I found them on eBay of all places, and was intrigued by their relatively close location.
I'm sure they'd elaborate more over email.

>427 marceloanciano: I'm going to wait for yours if it is only postponed.

>427 marceloanciano: Im also interested!

Same.

Same! Though I’m guessing Marcelo might not be able to give us a firm answer right away? (Unless it’s a clear no…)

>449 BorisG: yeah, Frankenstein is just postponed until next year, but whether we'll be able to put it out then is a moving feast. We'll have Lud and Princess of Mars next year too and two may be quite enough! m

>450 marceloanciano: fantastic news!

>450 marceloanciano: I’m happy to hear 😊

>450 marceloanciano: hooray, thanks Marcelo!

The 2025 BBDPA shortlist is out.

Areté Editions bagged two nominations with Frozen Hell (Roman Edition), the first in the usual Best British Book category (in which the Numbered version was shortlisted last year) and another in the Fine Binding category. Congratulations to Marcelo and the rest of the team - and best of luck for the gala night!

Lyra's Books is also well represented. The Alchemist (Lettered Edition) received two nominations, again in the usual Best British Book and Fine Binding categories, while The Wonderful Wizard of Oz (not sure which version(s), though) was nominated in three: the Best British Book, Fine Binding and Literature categories. So, one title from the Lyra's Press and Lyra's Classics each. Again, congratulations are in order!

Of the other publishers connected to the Ludlow nexus, Books Illustrated Ltd. picked up two nominations, one with Beowulf (The Morris Edition) in Excellence in Print Production and Interview with the Vampire (Deluxe Edition) in Fine Binding, whereas Curious King Books managed four: Before They Are Hanged (Lettered Edition) in Fine Binding, Before They Are Hanged (Deluxe Edition) in Best British Book, Hyperion (Lettered Edition) in Excellence in Print Production and Hyperion (Deluxe Edition) in Literature.

The Folio Society also received ten nominations across eight categories:

Excellence in Print Production:
* The Iliad & The Odyssey (LE)

Fine Binding:
* The Tales of Mystery and Imagination (not sure which version, likely LE)

Best Book Finishing:
* The Great Gatsby (LE)

Photographic Books:
* The Fight

Literature:
* Shout!
* William Shakespeare: The Complete Plays (SE)

Scholarly, Academic and Reference Books:
* A Night to Remember

Best Jacket / Cover Design:
* A Night to Remember
* Fire and Blood

Children's Trade 0 to 8 Years:
* Pippi Longstocking

Got to say the Folio nominations left me scratching my head. Normally, I would try to acquire as many of the shortlisted titles - and winners in particular - as I possibly can, but this time the titles are not even mildly interesting. Well, apart from Fire and Blood (which I already bought as part of the GRRM set), and perhaps Pippi Longstocking.

>454 supercell: I couldn’t find detailed descriptions of each category but I’d be interested to know what ‘best book finishing’ means.

I have the Gatsby LE and like it but the binding feels far too tight, to the point where I have to hold the book open at every page.

>456 supercell: Best (in) Book Finishing and Excellence in Print Production are this year's new categories. The description for the former is as follows:

"This category recognises outstanding finishing work that enhances the overall design, feel and impact of a book. The finish must add to the design of the book, making it more effective as an overall piece and exhibiting great finishing choices and techniques.

To be eligible, entries must feature one or more finishing techniques, such as:
* Cloth, (faux) leather or textured materials
* Metallic foil blocking, embossing or debossing
* Laminates (e.g gloss, matte, soft-touch)
* Or other creative finishing methods"

From today's email:

Alice In Wonderland and Frankenstein

One of our favourite artists, Gregory Manchess, has always wanted to illustrate Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, and we’re happy to oblige! Look out for a pre-sale later this year. After Alice, Greg will be working on Frankenstein, which we’ll be publishing in three volumes, as was the first edition.

A Princess Of Mars

Another good friend of ours, Gary Gianni, is working on A Princess of Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs. It promises to be a magnificent magnum opus, and we intend to publish in 2027.

>457 Shotcaller: I'm growing quite a Gianni collection at this point but it sounds like a project he'd be perfect for. Lots of creative possibility, he's already done the heroic art of old illustrators on works like Prince Valiant. He's usually very generous with the illustrations too.

>458 A.Godhelm: Very much so.

I have high hopes for all three titles here.

>457 Shotcaller: Hmm. All and sundry seem to be doing Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, whereas the other Alice gets ignored. I hope Areté / Gregory Manchess will eventually make the effort to complement Wonderland with a matching Through the Looking-Glass.

>458 A.Godhelm: This will be one of Gary's major projects, he's doing 12 full colour plates and 23 full page black and white illustrations! It's epic.

>461 marceloanciano: That sounds great. Also good to hear you’ve decided to go ahead with Frankenstein.

>462 What_What: me too. I'll almost certainly be a customer for that one.

>460 supercell: Good point, perhaps we should start with Through the Looking-Glass.

>464 marceloanciano: That would be great!

>464 marceloanciano: Would also be in for this as well!

The complete list of the 2025 BBDPA winners has finally been released. I know Books Illustrated already shared their good news on this forum, whereas Lyra's and Areté have been celebrating on Facebook, but here is a rundown of the more relevant winners:

* The Folio Society: William Shakespeare: The Complete Plays (core edition) in Literature
* Areté Editions: Frozen Hell (Roman Edition) in Fine Binding
* Lyra's Press: The Alchemist (Lettered Edition) in Best British Book
* The Books Illustrated: Beowulf (The Morris Edition) in Excellence in Print Production + Book of the Year

So, no cigar for Curious King this time, a lean year for the FS, first wins for both Lyra's and Areté, and the grand prix for the Books Illustrated. Ludlow Bookbinders, in particular, had lots to celebrate since they had done the bindings of three (plus one) prize-winners. So, congratulations to everyone involved in these magnificent projects.

Maybe curious king didn’t get any wins because none of the judges were fast enough to order one when they released.

Kidding of course, some really beautifully made books in the winners. The alchemist is stunning and while the story didn’t grab me the book is so well made I’m in two minds about whether I want to keep it.

Just a quick heads up! I've just put info about Lud-in-the-Mist sale on the blog, for people who are not on social media! It's been many years in the making and is a very richly illustrated book, more akin to Death and Honey than any of our other books https://arete-editions-blog.com/2026/05/20/lud-in-the-mist-pre-order-information...

>469 marceloanciano:

I hope copies will be available to people who don't hold rights. I've been waiting for this one for years.

>470 SF-72: Pretty sure there will be copies

>469 marceloanciano: Got the email this morning and have set a calendar reminder for public sale day. Really hoping to land one!

Really looking forward to this one :)

>471 marceloanciano:

Thanks. Fingers crossed.

Exciting!

I do wish that liber charta was used for the numbered (really liked it for frozen hell). I feel this quality of edition would warrant the more premium paper. Regardless, I am looking forward to getting this one on my shelf, it looks great (really like the spine design in particular).

>475 EdmundRodriguez: agree, or Mohawk Via Laid, like in recent Suntup AEs. Superfine is a relatively featureless paper, not very tactile…

But binding-wise I actively prefer the numbered.

Put in my order of the Numbered Edition of Lud-in-the-Mist :)

477
Ditto!

>477 Dr.Fiddy: >478 wcarter: Thanks! Really appreciate your support.

Hoping there are plenty of copies left for public sale!

>477 Dr.Fiddy: Same here, can't wait for this one!

>480 ambyrglow: >481 EdmundRodriguez: >472 Shadekeep: >470 SF-72: Just to let you know:
Lud-in-the-Mist finally, is ready for pre-sale. We’re pleased to tell you that the public pre-sale will run from 5pm BST (UK time) on 2 June.
- There are 8 copies of the Roman edition available with Patron rights attached – first come first served.
- There are 28 Numbered edition copies with rights attached – first come first served - and 75 non-rights copies of this edition for sale.
Available from https://www.arete-editions.com/store from 5pm BST (UK time) on 2 June.

>482 marceloanciano: Idly: do you allow requests for specific numbers?

>482 marceloanciano: Thanks! Sounds like I might at least have a chance for a non-rights Numbered, which is fine with me.

>483 ambyrglow: 1-150 would be taken, but numbers after that could be...

Got Lud-in-the-Mist Numbered, imagine I will find out later if it's one that conveys rights or not. Not really bothered either way, the book is the thing!

EDIT: When I ordered it reported 107 copies, currently down to 74 now.

Got mine! I remain a bit relieved that my taste is enough skewed from mainstream that I'm rarely trying to buy things that sell out in seconds. (Although if I succeed in snagging Suntup's June release as well, this is going to be a very expensive month!)

>486 Shadekeep: 53 at the moment. It seemed to take a while before the numbers dropped below the rights level (i.e., this was not one of those crazy Curious King mad dashes), so, there is a pretty good chance you did land rights.

>482 marceloanciano:

Thank you very much for that information.

I am relieved that I got a copy for myself and a friend. It's really nice that it's possible to get these without rights and without having to cross the finish line within seconds.

We're looking forward to the book!

>489 SF-72: >487 ambyrglow: >486 Shadekeep: Thank you all! It's only with your support that we can continue!

>488 supercell: Nice, thanks! And yes, it's not clearing out quite as quickly as I had feared it would.

>490 marceloanciano: Keep bringing out works like these and my future support is guaranteed!

EDIT: Just got an email from Phil that I've got future rights and my number is 113, which I rather like.

Well, I got a copy, but put the time in my calendar wrong and set it for an hour later than it should have been, so missed out on a chance for rights.

Roman edition sold out now, and the Numbered currently sitting at 41 remaining.

why do y'all always comment on sales like it's a horse race

>494 TomsRiverNJ: Yeah, sometimes that's what it feels like with these books that sell out super quickly :)
Says 37 copies (out of 225) in stock. So definitely a huge win for Arete, and of course for the rest of us which will read this lesser known masterpiece!

I was hoping for the rights too, as I saw over 100 copies when I started checkout, but then Visa decided that an additional authorization was needed (which seems to happen randomly), and I waited for that text message with the code, and waited... That's just my luck.
Either way, I'm glad there were enough copies available that I was still able to buy one, and I hope the same will be possible for the next title.

>496 tallchief:

That's really rotten luck and you just never know how long it takes for the code to arrive. Hopefully it will work out for you next time. But as you say, it's great that some copies are made available to buy for people who don't hold rights. I really appreciate that.

>496 tallchief: >497 SF-72: I know many people love rights, but as you both noted, so long as there are copies to purchase I am happy :)
Also personally, I really don't care about having the same limitation number apart from a series, which I think is nice, but even then not truly necessary in my opinion.

Looks like we're done to 31 copies.

>498 astropi: I want all the upcoming Arete titles, so rights would make sense just for some peace of mind while I wait for pre-sales :) Besides delays from Visa, my bank is eager to block my card if algorithms classify the transaction as suspicious, which happens often for purchases from fine presses (all in foreing currencies and usually the most expensive things I buy). Then I have to call the customer service to resolve the issue, which takes even more time. Or remember to call them in advance to whitelist the seller.
But if future Arete pre-sales are similar to Lud-in-the-Mist, I should be fine even without rights :)

>499 tallchief: Happily Arete titles haven't sold out with the speed that Curious King and CTP titles seem to sell. It's definitely frustrating when there's a title you really want and when you try to add a copy it's already sold out. So kudos to Arete for making enough copies to satisfy demand :)

>499 tallchief: What are the upcoming titles?

>501 Extrasolarian: See >420 Dr.Fiddy: and >457 Shotcaller:

>501 Extrasolarian: I thought there may have been mention of Somerset Maugham’s ‘A Razor’s Edge’ (which would really excite me), but I can’t seem to recall why I think this

>503 DMulvee: The books I remember being mentioned (although not sure if all are in the works) are:
Alice in Wonderland
A princess of mars
Frankenstein
The Color Purple
The Razor's Edge
Orlando
Robert E Howard book

>504 EdmundRodriguez: That is the list I have, as well. A Princess of Mars appears to have skipped the line and is predicted to be up next, with pre-sales around October.

As for Alice, it might make sense to do Through the Looking-Glass before Alice, businesswise (as Marcelo suggested): a higher percentage of those picking up the Looking-Glass can be expected to have interest in buying Wonderland, as well, to get a complete set, than vice versa - and lonely Alices would certainly be easier to sell to casual passers-by than standalone sequels. Through the Looking-Glass has not been confirmed yet, though.

I've declined to take the rights I was offered, on the theory that I'm not going to exercise them so they should go to someone who will, so at least one person should be getting a happy email today.

>503 DMulvee: Thanks for the mention. I've been waiting on a fine press version as it is one of my favorite books.

>503 DMulvee: Three years ago >106 marceloanciano: we were told Razor's Edge was "a long way away". So we're at least three years closer.

>504 EdmundRodriguez: I'd forgotten (if I ever knew) that Orlando might be coming. Such a joyful and gorgeously written novel.

>498 astropi:

Same here, as long as I can buy the books I'm interested in I'm good. I'm not comfortable with rights in general (apart from continuing series), so this works really well for me.

>506 ambyrglow: I rarely participate in rights chain stuff, so if I decline to purchase the next title, I assume my rights from this one go back into the pool for someone else to pick up? Or do I need to request that the rights be surrendered in advance? I'd kind of like to hold them for the moment just in case the next books are the Alices or something else I want.

>511 Shadekeep: I assume they just go back in the pool, yes! In this case I also have a very strong fondness for a specific number that's a non-rights number, so I decided I'd rather have my favorite number than rights I wasn't going to use.

>509 Shotcaller: You might be interested to know that next year Books Illustrated will be publishing Orlando, illustrated by Peter Malone.

>514 A.Nobody: Very interested! Thanks for letting me know.