1paradoxosalpha
This thread is for nominations and voting on stories for inclusion in the April-June reads in this group. Please feel free to draw on the ongoing brainstorming thread for nominations, but don't limit yourself to items discussed there. There is no further obligation--even to participate in the resulting discussion if a nomination is selected! It's perfectly okay to gamble on stories the nominator has never read, although also welcome for nominators to put up stories they've enjoyed and would like to revisit. In all these years, we've never been known to dog anyone for nominating a story where readers end up taking a dim view of it.
As in past rounds, any story that gets more "No" than "Yes" votes won't make the cut; otherwise they'll be prioritized according to net-yes-minus-no, and the final list will be in OPD sequence. Ties will be broken in favor of author and period variety.
To propose a story for voting, place the title and author between HTML-style angle-bracket tags. The open tag says vote (in brackets); the close tag says /vote (ditto). Multiple polls need multiple posts. If you put the name of the author in double square brackets, it will make it a linked "touchstone" for the LT database, and first publication dates of nominated stories are appreciated. Also welcome are remarks about the story, the author, and your nomination motives, and/or a link to an online version. Here is an example (from a previous thread):

A useful resource for general bibliography info including OPD and inclusion in collections is ISFDB.
You can see a sortable list of all previous discussions here. The persistent brainstorming thread is here. Nominations repeating old discussions will be disqualified, but revival of dormant discussion threads is always welcome. "That is not dead which can eternal lie," etc.
VOTING is scheduled to END on the Spring Equinox: Thursday, March 20.
Voting for your own nominations is permissible and encouraged.
As in past rounds, any story that gets more "No" than "Yes" votes won't make the cut; otherwise they'll be prioritized according to net-yes-minus-no, and the final list will be in OPD sequence. Ties will be broken in favor of author and period variety.
To propose a story for voting, place the title and author between HTML-style angle-bracket tags. The open tag says vote (in brackets); the close tag says /vote (ditto). Multiple polls need multiple posts. If you put the name of the author in double square brackets, it will make it a linked "touchstone" for the LT database, and first publication dates of nominated stories are appreciated. Also welcome are remarks about the story, the author, and your nomination motives, and/or a link to an online version. Here is an example (from a previous thread):

A useful resource for general bibliography info including OPD and inclusion in collections is ISFDB.
You can see a sortable list of all previous discussions here. The persistent brainstorming thread is here. Nominations repeating old discussions will be disqualified, but revival of dormant discussion threads is always welcome. "That is not dead which can eternal lie," etc.
VOTING is scheduled to END on the Spring Equinox: Thursday, March 20.
Voting for your own nominations is permissible and encouraged.
2AndreasJ
Vote: Robert Bloch, "Talent" (1960)
Current tally: Yes 7, No 0
3AndreasJ
Vote: Olympe Bhêly-Quénum, "A Child in the Bush of Ghosts" (1950)
Current tally: Yes 7, No 1, Undecided 1
(It might be interesting, some day when one has too much time on one's hands, to tally up the nationalities of the authors of DO reads. While there's a fair number of different countries represented -including, off the top of my head, Argentina, Belgium, India, Japan, and Sweden - there's clearly an awful lot of Britons and US-Americans.)
4AndreasJ
Vote: Clark Ashton Smith, "The Abominations of Yondo" (1926)
Current tally: Yes 6, No 1
5gwendetenebre
Vote: Randalls Round by Eleanor Scott (1929)
Current tally: Yes 7, No 0
6AndreasJ
Vote: H.P. Lovecraft & Zealia Bishop, "Medusa's Coil" (1939)
Current tally: Yes 7, No 0
Online e.g., here and here.
7AndreasJ
Vote: Jeffrey Ford, "The Pandemonium Waltz" (2023)
Current tally: Yes 7, No 0, Undecided 1
Originally published in Uncanny Magazine, and available from their website.
8AndreasJ
Oh, and the link in >1 paradoxosalpha: to the list of old discussions is to the old onedrive version, not the up-to-date Google docs version.
9paradoxosalpha
>8 AndreasJ: Thanks. Fixed it.
10paradoxosalpha
Vote: "The Two Musics" by Michael Cisco (2024)
Current tally: Yes 7, No 0, Undecided 2
11paradoxosalpha
The plan is to total votes tomorrow, but we are well short of the number of nominations needed to fill a calendar quarter of weeks. Last minute proposals?
12gwendetenebre
Vote: "The Ghost Village" by Peter Straub (1992)
Current tally: Yes 5, No 0
13gwendetenebre
Vote: "The Pearls of the Vampire Queen" by Michael Shea (1977)
Current tally: Yes 5, No 0
14gwendetenebre
Would anyone vote for making the Deep Ones discussions a monthly event? I think we're starting to run out of gas as far as a weekly thing goes...
15paradoxosalpha
>14 gwendetenebre: That would suit me okay.
16paradoxosalpha
We could do votes on the equinoxes to populate the next six months.
17gwendetenebre
>16 paradoxosalpha:
Sounds good. Anyone else have an opinion on monthly discussions?
Sounds good. Anyone else have an opinion on monthly discussions?
18housefulofpaper
Vote: "Gibbet Hill" by Bram Stoker (1890)
Current tally: Yes 3, No 0
19housefulofpaper
I've been unable to keep up with the weekly schedule, monthly may be more realistic, for me at any rate.
20RandyStafford
Vote: "The Fourth Seal" by Karl Karl Edward Wagner (1975)
Current tally: Yes 4, No 0
Anthologized in In a Lonely Place and two other anthologies (besides Centipede Press editions).
21AndreasJ
Monthly might be worth trying, it'd probably increase the proportion of discussions I actually participate in.
22gwendetenebre
>21 AndreasJ:
I was thinking that one positive result might be more participation. Can we try it starting with this one? And if there are any dissenting points of view, please post!
I was thinking that one positive result might be more participation. Can we try it starting with this one? And if there are any dissenting points of view, please post!
23paradoxosalpha
I am going to tally up now. If, as I suspect, we fall short of one selection per week for a quarter, I'll post the schedule as one per month for a semester.
24paradoxosalpha
We will also need a scheduling decision: First Wednesday of the month?
25gwendetenebre
I like continuing with Wednesday. First Wednesday is fine with me.

