

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Humankind: A Hopeful History (2019)by Rutger Bregman
![]()
No current Talk conversations about this book. This book is based on the premise that most people, deep down are pretty decent. I was not convinced by some of the content but I do appreciate that it has challenged some of my beliefs. There were also some portions of the book I found dull and I almost abandoned the book, but I am glad I stuck with it. There were some great stories and quotes throughout. Some of the ones that particularly resonated with me were: "Contact engenders more trust, more solidarity and more mutual kindness. It helps you see the world through other people’s eyes." "We are what we believe. We find what we go looking for." "Think as carefully about what information you feed your mind as you do about the food you feed your body." "If you treat employees as if they are responsible and reliable, they will be." 3.25/5 I wanted to like this book more as it agrees my belief that "people are mostly good". I'm left with the perception of criticism of research against his premise, rather than a presentation of supportive research. Even if we can all agree that folks are mostly "good", the book doesn't do a good job explaining what society should do about the small percent who don't maintain that good behavior, whether as criminals or politicians or business people. . . or the fact that incentives (religious, social, and financial, to name a few) continue to push "good" people to do "bad" things. A better understanding of the evolution of our brains could have also helped the book. Most critically Bregman failed to recognize: if being nice helps one in mate selection, then being nice is "selfish gene" behavior that will be rewarded by evolution--it's not just about survival. Humans evolved to emphasize cooperation, friendliness (homo puppy), and are inclined to trust one another. This book is interestingly written, well-referenced, and rearranges my thinking about prehistory. It covers in many places the archeological material similar to "The Dawn of Everything" that I finished reading not long ago. He also discusses modern psychological studies, like the Milman shock experiments, the Standford jail experiment, and intelligence tests, pointing out the flaws in the analyses that suggested humans could be mean, and talking to participants about what they felt during the trials. He discusses S.L.A. Marshall's discovery that in war, few soldiers fire their weapons. He considers the human gift to be that of cooperation, not intelligence or memory. He thinks the equality of the sexes in forager bands was a strong advantage. He notes that a study of human skulls over 200,000 years established that our faces and bodies have grown softer and rounder, and the jaws and teeth more childlike, in the same way that domesticated dogs resemble wolf pups. Hence his playful term homo puppy. Civilization brought war bands that evolved into dynasties, and inheritences made people jealous. He suggests that in cold of the ice ages bands slept close together, "...the struggle for existence was actually the snuggle for existence." no reviews | add a review
Awards
History.
Science.
Nonfiction.
HTML: From the author of the New York Times bestseller Utopia for Realists, a "bold" (Daniel H. Pink), "provocative" (Adam Grant) argument that our innate goodness and cooperation have been the greatest factors in humanity's success. If there is one belief that has united the left and the right, psychologists and philosophers, ancient thinkers and modern ones, it is the tacit assumption that humans are bad. It's a notion that drives newspaper headlines and guides the laws that shape our lives. From Machiavelli to Hobbes, Freud to Pinker, the roots of this belief have sunk deep into Western thought. Human beings, we're taught, are by nature selfish and governed primarily by self-interest. But what if it isn't true? International bestseller Rutger Bregman provides new perspective on the past 200,000 years of human history, setting out to prove that we are hardwired for kindness, geared toward cooperation rather than competition, and more inclined to trust rather than distrust one another. In fact this instinct has a firm evolutionary basis going back to the beginning of Homo sapiens. From the real-life Lord of the Flies to the solidarity in the aftermath of the Blitz, the hidden flaws in the Stanford prison experiment to the true story of twin brothers on opposite sides who helped Mandela end apartheid, Bregman shows us that believing in human generosity and collaboration isn't merely optimisticâ??-it's realistic. Moreover, it has huge implications for how society functions. When we think the worst of people, it brings out the worst in our politics and economics. But if we believe in the reality of humanity's kindness and altruism, it will form the foundation for achieving true change in society, a case that Bregman makes convincingly with his signature wit, refreshing frankness, and memorable storytelling. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
![]() GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)128Philosophy and Psychology Philosophy Of Humanity The Human ConditionLC ClassificationRatingAverage:![]()
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
While I don’t fully support everything Rutger Bregman has to say in this book (we’ll have to agree to disagree about his stance on punching Nazi’s), I do endorse his overall premise and can’t wait to read some of the works he’s cited. Overall this was a fascinating, read-able work and a bit of much needed hope in a difficult year.
(