

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Doctor Who and the Daleks (1964)by David Whitaker
![]() Penguin Random House (201) No current Talk conversations about this book. This is a mostly faithful novelization of the second Doctor Who serial, The Daleks. The biggest change comes about because there is no novelization of the first serial, and so the story of how Ian and Barbara first met the Doctor, and his kidnapping them, is instead adapted and crammed into the first couple of chapters here. The other alterations are mostly small omissions as a result of the story being told from Ian's perspective rather than the shifting perspective of the show. Thus, if you're particularly fond of the aforementioned serial, or if you've never seen it and want to see how the Dalek story began, then you'll probably enjoy this book. I agree with something Neil Gaiman alludes to in his introduction: that the novel is more interesting from a cultural history perspective than as a story in its own right. Back in 1964 if you missed a show then you had missed the show. There were no second chances. The novelizations, when they began to appear, were the first chance many people had to catch up on missed episodes. In this age of DVD boxsets and iPlayer and Sky and VCRs and the like it's a nice reminder of the impermanence of things. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to the kitchen before my flatmate decides to remind me of the impermanence of cake. This is a mostly faithful novelization of the second Doctor Who serial, The Daleks. The biggest change comes about because there is no novelization of the first serial, and so the story of how Ian and Barbara first met the Doctor, and his kidnapping them, is instead adapted and crammed into the first couple of chapters here. The other alterations are mostly small omissions as a result of the story being told from Ian's perspective rather than the shifting perspective of the show. Thus, if you're particularly fond of the aforementioned serial, or if you've never seen it and want to see how the Dalek story began, then you'll probably enjoy this book. I agree with something Neil Gaiman alludes to in his introduction: that the novel is more interesting from a cultural history perspective than as a story in its own right. Back in 1964 if you missed a show then you had missed the show. There were no second chances. The novelizations, when they began to appear, were the first chance many people had to catch up on missed episodes. In this age of DVD boxsets and iPlayer and Sky and VCRs and the like it's a nice reminder of the impermanence of things. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to the kitchen before my flatmate decides to remind me of the impermanence of cake. David Whitaker’s novel Doctor Who in an Exciting Adventure with the Daleks was first published on 12 November 1964 by Frederick Muller, Ltd. before Target Books reprinted it as Doctor Who and the Daleks on 2 May 1973. The novel adapts Terry Nation’s script for The Daleks, the second Doctor Who serial that aired between 21 December 1963 and 1 February 1964, starring the First Doctor (as portrayed by William Hartnell), his granddaughter Susan Foreman (played by Carole Ann Ford), and her schoolteachers, Barbara Wright and Ian Chesterton (portrayed by Jacqueline Hill and William Russell, respectively). The story portrays the Doctor and his companions traveling to Skaro, where they encounter the Daleks and their enemies, the Thals. As the first Doctor Who novel, Whitaker reimagines how Ian and Barbara meet the Doctor in the beginning of the story: Ian encounters Barbara at a car crash in the fog and tries to help her locate her missing student. The Doctor appears and makes Ian suspicious, so he follows him back to a police box, which the Doctor tries to enter without being noticed. Ian forces his way in, discovering the box’s larger interior dimensions before he passes out. In capturing the early era of Doctor Who, the TARDIS’s name alternates between Tardis, like a traditional ship’s name, or characters referring to it as the Ship (pgs. 22, 34). Further, in order to get around the Doctor’s reluctance to discuss personal matters, Ian christens him “Doctor Who” (pg. 52). In another odd change, Whitaker gives Susan’s last name as “English” rather than “Foreman,” thereby departing from the show (pg. 30). While future stories added details and depth and Davros to the Daleks’ origins, the early version of divergent mutation following an atomic blast, causing the Thals to become physically perfect and peaceful as the Daleks grew hideous and hateful, resembles the Morlocks and Eloi in H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine (pg. 99). Taking advantage of the options available to a novel and not a television series, Whitaker includes a climax involving sea monsters, cave-climbing, and a more dramatic battle that also features a glass Dalek like the one later seen in the 1985 serial, Revelation of the Daleks. At times, the story betrays its era of origin. Since Whitaker writes in the first person from Ian’s perspective, he occasionally demonstrates the gendered view of the world typical of the early 1960s. The style and content of the book also recalls science-fiction of that era more than later Doctor Who tie-in novels. In this, it serves as an interesting time capsule for Whovians who are interested in mid-century science-fiction. The story also inspired the 1965 film, Dr. Who and the Daleks, in which director Gordon Flemyng adapted Nation’s script for a standalone film not connected to the television series. The film did well enough to earn a sequel in 1966, Daleks’ Invasion Earth 2150 A.D., which adapted another of Nation’s scripts, this time for the second serial of the second season, The Dalek Invasion of Earth. In this edition, BBC books presents the novel in a facsimile of the 1964 edition complete with Arnold Schwartzman’s illustrations. This is the novelisation of the very first Dalek story and was the first such book, being published in November 1964 just under a year after its original broadcast. It differs considerably from the TV version, being intended as a self standing novel, so Ian and Barbara join at the beginning of this story (no An Unearthly Child story), and don't know each other beforehand, Barbara being Susan's private tutor and Ian an unemployed scientist. The story is told in the first person from Ian's point of view, so the narrative is correspondingly restructured around his actions, with other plot strands (e.g. the fact of the Doctor using mirrors to blind the city's detectors being told to Ian after the event). David Whitaker spends a lot of time exploring the Thals' pacifism, with Ian trying at great lengths to persuade them to fight for their own survival. The Daleks are quite uncharacteristically expansive in explaining their motives to the travellers. The story also contains a (short-lived) glass Dalek as their overall leader. Overall, while different in many details, this is essentially the same story and a good piece of writing. no reviews | add a review
Belongs to SeriesBelongs to Publisher SeriesIs contained inIs an adaptation of
The mysterious Doctor and his granddaughter Susan are joined by unwilling adventurers Ian Chesterton and Barbara Wright in an epic struggle for survival on an alien planet.In a vast metal city they discover the survivors of a terrible nuclear war - the Daleks. Held captive in the deepest levels of the city, can the Doctor and his new companions stop the Daleks' plan to totally exterminate their mortal enemies, the peace-loving Thals? More importantly, even if they can escape from the Daleks, will Ian and Barbara ever see their home planet Earth again?This novel is based on the second Doctor Who story which was originally broadcast from 21 December 1963-1 February 1964. Featuring the First Doctor as played by William Hartnell, and his companions Susan, Ian and Barbara No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
![]() GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)813Literature English (North America) American fictionLC ClassificationRatingAverage:![]()
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
It was interesting to read a book through Ian's POV. Ian is well developed character and the Doctor seems much better character in the book.
I feel like the book was much stronger than TV story. (