The Caucasian Chalk Circle
by Bertolt Brecht
On This Page
Description
In a prologue set in Soviet Georgia, a narrator introduces the story of choice and sacrifice. The servant girl Grusha sacrifices everything she has to look after an abandoned child, even marrying a dying peasant in order to provide for him. But when the boy's biological mother attempts to reclaim him, the unruly judge Azdak calls on the ancient tradition of the chalk circle to resolve the dispute. Brecht subverts an ancient Chinese story into a parable advocating that resources should go to show more those best able to make use of them. A morality masterpiece, the play powerfully demonstrates Brecht's pioneering theatrical techniques. show lessTags
Recommendations
Member Reviews
This play was great! I never knew Brecht could be such a humanist! I liked how it seemed like a real adventure, and you could imagine it taking place in a real painted wooden outdoors instead of on a stupid set. I liked how there were twists and turns and heartwarming young lovers with the politics! My favourite character was Azdak, though. The ending was a big challenge for me--if you're pro-revolution, you have to be okay with people getting their shit taken away, and not all those people will be the enemy--some will be the ones Brecht mentions, the ones who shelter under the big people's wings. I mean hell, that's me, and ... you? If you work a job in this economy and want to live your politics, instead of just talk about them, show more you're playing with fire.* And yet fire's all that warms our tired proletarian hearts! Gee whiz, Brecht really brings it all home with this one. Gewöhnungseffekt.
*(An alternative metaphor, given the subject matter of the play, would have been "stealing a baby.") show less
*(An alternative metaphor, given the subject matter of the play, would have been "stealing a baby.") show less
Peça fantástica. Saber que Brecht existe me faz ter o dobro de raiva daquilo que hoje se passa por arte política.
Bem, o que acontece é que ele era inteligente e escrevia para um público que ele supunha inteligente. Que ele tentava fazer inteligente. Era duma época em que ainda se punha fé na esperteza das massas.
É imprevisível e é engraçada (Brecht é o primeiro alemão que me fez rir e esse é um feito que não esquecerei). Todas as cenas com o Azdak são absolutamente espetaculares. O livro, que já era bom, vira o que é no penúltimo ato, quando ele entra em cena.
Mas Brecht não queria que as pessoas olhassem pra sua obra e dissessem simplesmente "muito bom" ou "fiz haha" — ele queria te fazer questionar por que é bom show more e por que haha, então me sinto numa obrigação aqui. Analisemos de maneira meio superficial o papel que o Azdak cumpre nessa peça por um minuto: Brecht nos põe de maneira intencionalmente inverossímil um juiz justo na história para que a gente ria, mas daí pare para pensar que absurdo é esse mundo em que vivemos onde é inverossímil um juiz ser justo. Só eu acho que não existe nada hoje em dia que faça algo minimamente próximo disso enquanto também ainda tenha algo a dizer? Não é apenas uma sobreposição de forma e conteúdo, mas o uso da forma como conteúdo em si. É algo que parece ter desaparecido em qualquer coisa com fim minimamente político. Em vez disso, temos esses troços meio oscarbait ou aqueles outros super vagos e pseudo-poéticos que são só chatos.
* * *
A quem interessar, é um livro relativamente fácil de ler em alemão. Tem meia dúzia de coloquialismos para os quais o dicionário não é de ajuda alguma, mas dá pra lidar bem. Todas as vezes que eu achei que tivesse entendido algo errado porque "como assim???!" era só o Brecht fazendo a coisa dele. Fui totalmente Verfremdungseffektado. show less
Bem, o que acontece é que ele era inteligente e escrevia para um público que ele supunha inteligente. Que ele tentava fazer inteligente. Era duma época em que ainda se punha fé na esperteza das massas.
É imprevisível e é engraçada (Brecht é o primeiro alemão que me fez rir e esse é um feito que não esquecerei). Todas as cenas com o Azdak são absolutamente espetaculares. O livro, que já era bom, vira o que é no penúltimo ato, quando ele entra em cena.
Mas Brecht não queria que as pessoas olhassem pra sua obra e dissessem simplesmente "muito bom" ou "fiz haha" — ele queria te fazer questionar por que é bom show more e por que haha, então me sinto numa obrigação aqui. Analisemos de maneira meio superficial o papel que o Azdak cumpre nessa peça por um minuto: Brecht nos põe de maneira intencionalmente inverossímil um juiz justo na história para que a gente ria, mas daí pare para pensar que absurdo é esse mundo em que vivemos onde é inverossímil um juiz ser justo. Só eu acho que não existe nada hoje em dia que faça algo minimamente próximo disso enquanto também ainda tenha algo a dizer? Não é apenas uma sobreposição de forma e conteúdo, mas o uso da forma como conteúdo em si. É algo que parece ter desaparecido em qualquer coisa com fim minimamente político. Em vez disso, temos esses troços meio oscarbait ou aqueles outros super vagos e pseudo-poéticos que são só chatos.
* * *
A quem interessar, é um livro relativamente fácil de ler em alemão. Tem meia dúzia de coloquialismos para os quais o dicionário não é de ajuda alguma, mas dá pra lidar bem. Todas as vezes que eu achei que tivesse entendido algo errado porque "como assim???!" era só o Brecht fazendo a coisa dele. Fui totalmente Verfremdungseffektado. show less
When the sharks the sharks devour
Little fishes have their hour.
This might be the Master at his finest, remarkably both modern and ancient, timeless parables are bracketed in the struggle against fascists with an all too human squalor that likely made Stalin squeal.
The play within the play is apparently from an ancient Chinese tale, it proved unexpectedly surprising. Grusha is a wonderful, highly developed protagonist, unlike the Portia of Venice, her motivation isn't guile but an almost childish concept of loyalty and justice. No doubt Brecht embraced this unlikely refuge even as the world around him was collapsing into barbarism. The title refers to the Chinese story of a judge placing a child in a chalked circle and the two women show more claiming to be the mother are asked to remove the child, the nominal reason being that only the true parent could extricate the young one. As the reasoning goes the judge awards the child to the woman who didn't attempt to remove the child for fear of harming it. This is replicated by Brecht with certain human caveats about the stewards of justice and the greasing of palms. show less
Little fishes have their hour.
This might be the Master at his finest, remarkably both modern and ancient, timeless parables are bracketed in the struggle against fascists with an all too human squalor that likely made Stalin squeal.
The play within the play is apparently from an ancient Chinese tale, it proved unexpectedly surprising. Grusha is a wonderful, highly developed protagonist, unlike the Portia of Venice, her motivation isn't guile but an almost childish concept of loyalty and justice. No doubt Brecht embraced this unlikely refuge even as the world around him was collapsing into barbarism. The title refers to the Chinese story of a judge placing a child in a chalked circle and the two women show more claiming to be the mother are asked to remove the child, the nominal reason being that only the true parent could extricate the young one. As the reasoning goes the judge awards the child to the woman who didn't attempt to remove the child for fear of harming it. This is replicated by Brecht with certain human caveats about the stewards of justice and the greasing of palms. show less
A script should be a quick read. A play isn't going to be more than two hours, so it should take even less than that to read from cover to cover. Yet this book took me days to finish because I just wasn't enjoying it. This surprised me, because I recall finding it rather witty and interesting the last time I read it. It doesn't help that I studied and performed this in my first year of college, so every page is filled with memories of how poorly we achieved that.
The basic plot is all right. A rich, selfish woman is fleeing revolution, and is so interested in her clothes that she leaves her baby behind. A servant is unable to leave the child to be executed, so takes the child with her, and as they journey she comes to love and care for show more the child, raising him as her own son even though this destroys her reputation and loses her her fiancé. Then the rich woman comes back because she needs the heir to claim her money, and takes the servant to court for abducting the child. It's an exciting adventure with some romance and a court scene thrown in.
The problem is all the Brechtian trappings - his 'epic theatre' and blunt moralising. There is a framing device/opening scene that is unbelievably boring, setting the rest of the story as a platy within a play. The story is narrated by a 'singer' who acts as a Greek chorus - a device horribly outdated for something written in the 1940s. And most of the characters talk in endless riddles and metaphors that makes their dialogue irritating at best and incomprehensible at worst. Oh, and there is a lot of lewd dialogue - I'm not sure if this is due to the translator, but it just made me feel uncomfortable having people swear in the middle of a very stagey Greek theatre type play.
I don't know how I used to enjoy this script, because it was no fun at all. This edition is aimed at students and comes with a bunch of questions at the end to stimulate discussion, but no answers, so I find that sort of thing totally useless. show less
The basic plot is all right. A rich, selfish woman is fleeing revolution, and is so interested in her clothes that she leaves her baby behind. A servant is unable to leave the child to be executed, so takes the child with her, and as they journey she comes to love and care for show more the child, raising him as her own son even though this destroys her reputation and loses her her fiancé. Then the rich woman comes back because she needs the heir to claim her money, and takes the servant to court for abducting the child. It's an exciting adventure with some romance and a court scene thrown in.
The problem is all the Brechtian trappings - his 'epic theatre' and blunt moralising. There is a framing device/opening scene that is unbelievably boring, setting the rest of the story as a platy within a play. The story is narrated by a 'singer' who acts as a Greek chorus - a device horribly outdated for something written in the 1940s. And most of the characters talk in endless riddles and metaphors that makes their dialogue irritating at best and incomprehensible at worst. Oh, and there is a lot of lewd dialogue - I'm not sure if this is due to the translator, but it just made me feel uncomfortable having people swear in the middle of a very stagey Greek theatre type play.
I don't know how I used to enjoy this script, because it was no fun at all. This edition is aimed at students and comes with a bunch of questions at the end to stimulate discussion, but no answers, so I find that sort of thing totally useless. show less
I think everyone who's read this book knows Brecht, and everyone who hasn't read it should. _The Caucasian Chalk Circle_ is of course a play -- 'book' is a little inaccurate -- which, in the process of being extremely good, shows just how much greater Brecht the writer was than Brecht the theoretician. Epic theater, to hear Brecht describe it, sounds downright inaccessible and unfriendly; to hear him _write_ it, it's like a dream, infinitely _superior_ to the naturalistic plays of earlier modern times.
(And I may never get an answer to this, at least in this context, but did anyone else pick up a massive 'early SNES RPG' vibe from this book? _This_ is the style and atmosphere that the likes of _Final Fantasy 4_ and _A Link to the Past_ show more were *trying*, and failing, to produce...) show less
(And I may never get an answer to this, at least in this context, but did anyone else pick up a massive 'early SNES RPG' vibe from this book? _This_ is the style and atmosphere that the likes of _Final Fantasy 4_ and _A Link to the Past_ show more were *trying*, and failing, to produce...) show less
Writing in exile in the USA during the Second World War, Brecht borrowed from an ancient Chinese story-echoed in the Judgement of Solomon-in which two women both claim the same child. Brecht's subversion of this tale provides a parable which seems to say that resources should go to those in whose hands they will be most productive. Thanks to the rascally judge, Azdak, one of Brecht's most vivid creations, this story, at least, has a happy outcome. The child is entrusted to the peasant Grusha, who has loved it and nurtured it.
Originally intended for Broadway, this translation by James and Tania Stern (with verse translation by W. H. Auden) has been thoroughly revised, and the volume includes a full introduction and commentary by John show more Willett and Ralph Manheim. show less
Originally intended for Broadway, this translation by James and Tania Stern (with verse translation by W. H. Auden) has been thoroughly revised, and the volume includes a full introduction and commentary by John show more Willett and Ralph Manheim. show less
The start of the play was so boring. The actual interest started after the narration of the story of the tale about the child. I liked the judgement and the judge , but my winner character is Grusha. The simple hearted girl who took care of the baby so well against all odds. I really get amused at the narration of the character of governor's wife Natella , her love for gowns and i also derived fun from the description of her doctors. I do not understand the implication of the "caucasian" in the title. Never mind, I liked the plot and treatment too.
Members
- Recently Added By
Lists
Plays I Like
230 works; 31 members
German Literature
514 works; 55 members
Philip Ward's Lifetime Reading Plan
592 works; 22 members
Favourite Books
1,817 works; 316 members
1940s
221 works; 25 members
Harold Bloom - The Western Canon: D. The Chaotic Age
833 works; 24 members
Books Read in 2017
4,248 works; 129 members
20th Century Literature
1,161 works; 54 members
Books Read in 2018
4,360 works; 110 members
r/acting on Reddit - Essential Plays
44 works; 2 members
Next Plays / 2025
352 works; 1 member
Books Read in 2025
4,090 works; 97 members
Author Information

Bertolt Brecht was born on February 10, 1898 in Augsburg, Bavaria, and died on August 14, 1956. He was a German playwright, theatre director and Marxist. The modest house where he was born is today preserved as a Brecht Museum. Brecht formed a writing collective which became prolific and very influential. He wrote many lyrics for musicals and show more collaborated with Kurt Weill to create Die Dregroschenoper -- the biggest hit in 1920s Berlin. Brecht experimented with his own theater and company -- the Berliner Ensemble -- which put on his plays under his direction and which continued after his death with the assistance of his wife. Brecht aspired to create political theater, and it is difficult to evaluate his work in purely aesthetic terms. Brecht died in 1956. (Bowker Author Biography) show less
Some Editions
Awards and Honors
Series
Belongs to Publisher Series
Work Relationships
Is contained in
Brecht Plays 3 : Caucasian chalk circle + Life of Galileo + Resistable rise of Arturo Ui by Hugh Rorrison
Seven Plays: In the Swamp / A Man's a Man / Saint Joan of the Stockyards / Mother Courage / Galileo / The Good Woman of Setzuan / The Caucasian Chalk Circle by Bertolt Brecht
The Caucasian Chalk Circle + The Life of Galileo + The Threepenny Opera + The Trial of Lucullus by Bertolt Brecht
Brecht : Collected plays : Volume 7 : The Visions of Simone Machard + Schweyk in the Second World War + The Caucasian Chalk Circle + The Duchess of Malfi by John Willett
The Caucasian Chalk Circle + The Good Person of Szechwan + Life of Galileo + Mr Puntila and his Man Matti by Bertolt Brecht
Is an adaptation of
Is abridged in
Has as a reference guide/companion
Has as a study
Has as a supplement
Has as a commentary on the text
Has as a student's study guide
Klett Lektürehilfen : Bert Brecht : Der kaukasische Kreidekreis : Eine Einführung in das epische Theater by Karl-Heinz Hahnengreß
Common Knowledge
- Canonical title
- The Caucasian Chalk Circle
- Original title
- Der kaukasische Kreidekreis
- Original publication date
- 1944 (ontstaan) (ontstaan); 1949
- Important places*
- Azerbeidzjan
- Related movies
- The Caucasian Chalk Circle (1997 | IMDb); Caucasian Chalk Circle (1973 | IMDb); BBC Play of the Month (1965 | IMDb)
- First words
- Among the ruins of a destroyed Caucasian village the members of two kolchos villages are sitting in a circle, smoking and drinking wine.
- Original language
- German
- Canonical DDC/MDS
- 832.912
- Canonical LCC
- PT2603.R397
- Disambiguation notice
- 0394172582 1971 softcover English Grove (tr. Eric Bentley)
0713685948 2008 softcover English Methuen Drama Modern Plays (tr. Frank McGuinness)
0816635285 1999 softcover English Minnesota Press (tr. Eric Bentley)
1408... (show all)126702 2010 softcover English Methuen Drama Modern Plays (tr. Alistair Beaton)
3518100319 1963 softcover German edition suhrkamp 31
3518739751 2013 eBook German suhrkamp
*Some information comes from Common Knowledge in other languages. Click "Edit" for more information.
Classifications
Statistics
- Members
- 1,251
- Popularity
- 19,510
- Reviews
- 12
- Rating
- (3.63)
- Languages
- 11 — Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, Russian, Swedish
- Media
- Paper, Ebook
- ISBNs
- 38
- ASINs
- 31




























































