War Is a Force that Gives Us Meaning

Chris Hedges wrote War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning after the events of September 2001, but before the Afghanistan and Iraq wars of the 21st century that make it all the more painful to read today. About two thirds of the text is memoir, but in the form of anecdotes pressed into service for a war correspondent's reflections about the perennial nature of war and what it does to societies and individuals. Many of these stories are grueling to read, and Hedges very consciously straddles a line on which he hopes to make patent the attractions of war without himself glamorizing it.

There are many literary references in this book, especially to the classics of antiquity which Hedges studied at Harvard during a hiatus in his work as a show more journalist. He gives these their due as evidence of the enduring attributes of war, but he avoids elevating them into sanction for it. He also returns at various points to his own need for literary sustenance in the midst of war (e.g. 90, 169).

In his introduction, Hedges disclaims a pacifist agenda. He writes that his aim is "a call for repentance" in the face of growing US military hubris. The book is concerned with the ways in which war is fostered by the dehumanizing falsehoods of nationalism, destroying culture and erecting an abstract "cause" to which life must be subordinated. Hedges proposes memory and love as the antidotes to the martial impulse, where these are rooted in lived contact with others, particularly across ethnic and religious divides. Unfortunately, this book is as timely now as when it was first published, and there is no real likelihood that it will become irrelevant in the foreseeable human future. show less

With the recent passing of Henry Kissinger and the current ongoing genocides in the Middle East I was drawn to read this Chris Hedges work from 2002. Sadly it is distressingly still relevant in every way today. His graphic telling of brutalities and overpowering repulsions of carnage suggest a pornographic attraction, which is one of the themes in this book about the personal impacts of being in war. Deep psychological effects are coupled with observations on propaganda campaigns selling wars to constituencies. He is well seasoned and carefully calculated in weighing his facts. His narrative is up close and personal. Yet the book is largely philosophical. Invoking literary references as well as other military sources, Hedges constructs show more a point of view that endures. In part this supports the man in the street perspective of how civilizations crumble into dust. While not offered as such it contributes at least little towards understanding how Israel and Hamas are hell bent on obliterating their homeland. This seems to be no middle ground and probably never has been, especially once at war. show less

Hedges delivers a brutal analysis of war and its impact on individuals and society. I've admired his journalism for a long time and I appreciated his incorporation of his personal experiences, even his dark and fearful moments. Evoking classic Greek literature and Shakespeare also gave his argument a broad and weighty scope deeply rooted in a history of human experiences of war and he carnage it brings.

As the title suggests, this is a book about the attractions of war, its mythic appeal, and the ways in which that appeal is willfully distorted by media, government, and ideological forces. But also, more disturbingly, Hedges shows how war can hold a very real, authentic attraction for some--for those individuals who become obsessed with death, with being a hero, and for those movements and peoples who latch on to it as a source of collective identity and even feel nostalgia for the forces of social unification and individual intimacy it bears.

I think this is one of the best attempts I've read to try and de-glorify war, but still examine why humans have such a love affair with it.

It's a thoughtful, measured approach and draws on many historical and fictional examples from literature and our past. There's also a healthy dose of personal experience used as a leavening agent.

This is a terrible book because it is true. Chris Hedges spent 15 years reporting wars around the world. This book is the result of those experiences. It exposes war as it actually is, devoid of myth and glory. It should be required reading in every school but no government would allow it.

Hedges has a reporter's view of war which somehow never reaches the newspapers or other media they work for. He speaks of how scum rises to the top through ruthlessness and amorality, the atrocities on all sides and the governments that crush truth in favor of myth to promote the wars they want.

The writing here is a professional product, well written and easy to read. He has an excellent knowledge of the classics and uses that knowledge well. I urge show more everyone to read this book. show less

"War is a Force that Gives Us Meaning" is a darkly ironic statement, and one which explains Hedges' thesis. War can serve as a unifying agent in society, subsuming the individual will into a greater national cause - of course, this is not always a good thing.

Hedges examines, in a literary and introspective manner, the injustices and lies which political and military leaders use to justify wars. This is not to say that all wars are unjustifiable, but that we must always have cause to be suspect.

It is a mistake to characterize him as anti-patriotic or anti-American, despite his fierce criticism of Bush II.

Patriotism is not mindlessly waving a flag, buying ribbons and singing ballads, it is not hating those who are different or rewriting show more history to support your worldview, it is not destroying history or culture, or the addiction of violence, of being caught up in the narrative of war and good v. evil. It is standing for values and morality and, as cliche as it might sound, love.

There is another segment which I find particularly interesting - how war and violence are made appealing, perhaps through selective distortion of history, positive media, and 'other-ization' of the enemy.

Perhaps the only criticism I have of Hedge's sermonizing writing style - how can Hedges be more repetitive in 200 pages than Wililam T. Vollmann is in 3000? I don't say this because I disagree with him - on the contrary. I agree with nearly everything he's said. I cannot offer anything but the most subjective reasons of personal taste, and suggest you form your own opinions - especially with a book like this. It is proposing ideas far too important simply to be ignored. show less