Picture of author.

A. E. Hotchner (1920–2020)

Author of Papa Hemingway

40+ Works 2,068 Members 45 Reviews

About the Author

A. E. Hotchner is a dramatist, novelist, screenwriter, and biographer

Works by A. E. Hotchner

Papa Hemingway (1966) — Author — 858 copies, 7 reviews
Hemingway in Love: His Own Story (2015) 197 copies, 10 reviews
Doris Day: Her Own Story (1976) 164 copies, 4 reviews
King of the Hill: A Memoir (1972) 59 copies, 1 review
The Good Life According to Hemingway (2008) 40 copies, 2 reviews
Hemingway and His World (1989) 26 copies, 1 review

Associated Works

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Canonical name
Hotchner, A. E.
Legal name
Hotchner, Aaron Edward
Birthdate
1920-06-28
Date of death
2020-02-15
Gender
male
Education
Washington University
Occupations
lawyer
journalist
entrepreneur
screenwriter
author
Organizations
United States Air Force
Newman's Own
Relationships
Salinger, J. D. (friend)
Hemingway, Ernest (friend)
Short biography
Born in St. Louis, Aaron Edward Hotchner grew up in the Westgate Hotel at Delmar and Kingshighway, and attended Soldan High School. A 1941 Washington University Law School graduate, he served as a military journalist before becoming a successful editor, novelist, playwright and biographer. Respected for giving all profits from a joint venture with actor Paul Newman to charities and the arts, Hotchner is best known for Papa Hemingway, his biography of close friend Ernest Hemingway. King of the Hill, A. E. Hotchner's evocative novel about growing up in St. Louis during the Great Depression, was captured on film in 1993.
Nationality
USA
Places of residence
St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Westport, Connecticut, USA
Associated Place (for map)
USA

Members

Reviews

45 reviews
Aaron is right outside when a jewelry store robbery goes awry, resulting in murder. Although Aaron sees the real culprit bolt from the scene, Aaron's father is the one the cops come and take to jail. It'll be up to the "detectifying" of an almost-thirteen-year-old boy to prove his father's innocence in The Amazing Adventures of Aaron Broom by author A. E. Hotchner.

Now. I should tell some of you, don't be fooled by the young protagonist and the lads on the vintage book cover and think this is show more a children's book or something. Readers from Aaron's age to the age of the author—who's around a hundred years old—are bound to enjoy this tale.

An old-fashioned historical mystery it is, steeped in its Depression-era St. Louis setting, but it's not driving hard to be super-mystery-ish the entire time. During the first quarter, it kind of reminded me of reading one of those slice-of-life classics my teachers would've assigned back in school.

Then, gradually and all of a sudden, I was all in. Aaron is such a mix of maturity and innocence, of inexperience, sharp wits, and relevant, real-deal principles. (You ought to hear this kid talk about his soul.) He narrates in a distinct, blunt voice, saying what's on his mind as it comes to him, and he's also funny without necessarily trying to be.

I'd be having a bit of a laugh, and then, just like that, Aaron, his memories, and his next "happening" would break my heart. Then warm my heart. Then get my heart all pumped, like, "Yeah, you tell 'em, kid! You show 'em! Get it, Aaron!"

I suspected I'd find this novel delightful and entertaining, but I didn't expect all the substance, poignancy, and hope that comes along with it. I also didn't expect to have tears in my eyes twice or thrice, including at the end of the story, but, well. That happened.
show less
OJ in the Morning is a breath of fresh air. It is a focused, comprehensive and totally delightful collection of short pieces on the minefield of being older. Hotchner writes with the energy of a first timer, but he’s far from it, not to mention being 92.

The book is evenly paced, constantly amusing, and ever insightful and incisive. Everyone will have someone or something to relate to and laugh at in this book. Its appeal is universal, but its focus is the “mature”.

The collection show more consists of 23 standalone pieces, each preceded by a quote relevant to it, by someone who should know. They are not connected, except by the fact they reflect coping at some level (Should you renew magazines for one year or two?).

Reading it, I was completely transported back to the era of Robert Benchley, whose short, intensely creative pieces were the bane of his existence, but I own 28 volumes of them (all first editions!), and they are precious, humorous insights into his era. Most of them are accompanied by cartoon illustrations by Gluyas Williams, and Hotchner’s turn of phrase fairly screams for similar treatment. His descriptions of meeting available women, dealing with a pet parrot, struggling with golf and tennis, finding a doable hobby, are all intensely visual, and though he is an easy read and a gentle and economical wordsmith, illustrations by the right artist would make this book a riot.

As it is, it is so engaging and so relevant to more and more of my expanding circle, I am buying a case to distribute among them. If that’s not a recommendation, I don’t know what will convince you.
show less
An interesting, if overlong detailing of the Stones through the Sixties, and the death of Brian Jones. It's a pretty ugly story, overall, and it really paints Jagger in a bad light. But it's also an interesting look into the alien world of the Lords of Rock, those who've achieved a godlike status that most of us can't even conceive of.

On the other hand, it's also very much a standard success story of meeting the right people at the right time, and leaving a trail of blood and bodies in your show more wake as you claw your way to the top.

It wasn't a fun story, but it sure as hell was an interesting one.
show less
This one feels off and gives the impression that A.E. Hotchner''s publisher & editor went back to the well to try to cash in on the recent popularity of Hemingway spousal related publications e.g. The Paris Wife, Paris Without End: The True Story of Hemingway's First Wife, Mrs. Hemingway, Unbelievable Happiness and Final Sorrow: The Hemingway-Pfeiffer Marriage etc. and films e.g. "Papa", "Hemingway and Gellhorn", "Midnight in Paris" etc.

The editor seems to have constructed this from show more Hotchner's notes for 1966's Papa Hemingway and expanded it with material from other sources (probably some of those listed above) in order to build a story of Hemingway supposedly telling Hotchner the story of his simultaneous love of Hadley Richardson and Pauline Pfeiffer and the supposed 100 days of separation that first wife Hadley Richardson imposed on the Hemingway/Pfeiffer relationship before she would grant a divorce. This is presented as if Hemingway told Hotchner the story over the course of their 13 years of friendship.

On the way to present a more dramatic story, various incidents or facts seem to be invented and these "wrong notes" are what put me off this book. I'm picking these up as a self-admitted Hemingway nut, and an actual Hemingway scholar would probably pick up even more of them. A few examples of what I mean:
- Hemingway and Picasso meet during the supposed 100 days (which would have been from late Sept. 1926 to end of Dec. 1926) and then go to a party at Gertrude Stein's apartment where they proceed to argue about the way that author portrayed then in The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas, a book that wasn't even published until 1933.
- several times it is mentioned that Hemingway's fishing boat "Pilar" was bought with Gus Pfeiffer's (Pauline Pfeiffer's uncle) money whereas Hemingway was inordinately proud of buying the boat with his own money earned or advance by Scribner's and Esquire Magazine.
- Hemingway's voice only occasionally sounds authentic here, although quote marks are used throughout as if his speech was being quoted verbatim. For instance, I would expect a "mano a mano" conversation between Hemingway and Hotchner to have much rougher language, but the speech here seems all cleaned up and romanticized. The only off-colour word I remember was "shitmaru" which is a Hotchnerism from Dear Papa, Dear Hotch: The Correspondence of Ernest Hemingway & A.E. Hotchner

Anyway, maybe that seems thin to some, but I remember those without even going back to look them up. If I took notes while reading I'm sure there would be several more specifics but the overall impression would still be the same. I'll be interested to read what a Hemingway authority review of this would be.

So, this is probably a 4 rating as a dramatic fiction (which is what its average rating seems to be) but I only give it a 2 due to deception.
show less

Lists

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
40
Also by
10
Members
2,068
Popularity
#12,428
Rating
3.9
Reviews
45
ISBNs
139
Languages
16

Charts & Graphs