Dana K. White

I enjoy reading about other people’s methods with decluttering and organizing. It was really hard taking the emotion of out cleaning out my mother’s house after her passing, but it was necessary or I would have added more clutter to my house.

The book gave me the motivation to tackle my canned goods cabinet, get rid of itchy clothing, shoes that hurt, and to invest in space saving items for my drawers and closets so I can easily see what may be unnecessary to keep.

One thing mentioned in show more the book that I’ve learned through my frustration is that you cannot force your spouse to feel the same way about clutter and organization as you do. show less

Dana K. White understands me. A fellow right-brained artsy type with a soupçon of ADHD, White has figured out how to keep herself on track. As she points out, nearly of these books for slobs are penned by the preternaturally neat; they haven’t got a clue of the cluelessness and obstacles that beset us slobs. As a recovering slob, White recommends starting one habit at a time until we chip away at the piles of dishes, the stacks of papers, the “collections,” the — all the things that show more keep us from having a presentable home.

What I really love about White is that she anticipates all the objections and excuses we artsy slobs will come up with; of course she does! She’s made them herself! I’ve read more get-organized books than I can count, but White points out that those books get it all wrong. If we can just battle back the clutter, half of the organization will emerge all by itself. I wish I’d had this book when I first had children. Highly, highly, highly recommended. show less

It may seem odd to give this book only four stars and yet give the older Bahn book on Ice Age art five - see http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1122019.Images_of_the_Ice_Age - but there is a reason.

There is absolutely no doubt of the value of Lewis-Williams attempt to create a theory of cave art nor the insights that he provides into consciousness studies and what such studies may be able to tell us about the motivations and culture of palaeolithic homo sapiens.

The doubt derives from the show more same scepticism about what we can ever actually know that we recorded in our review of the earlier work. The data is too spread out over too great a length of time and is too represented by what can survive materially to allow any strong claims of knowledge.

All theory in this area tends to tell us more about our preoccupations than those of pre-historic man and woman, although one must concede that each intervention by the Academy does add something, a new angle to compare with the angles shown to us in the past.

But caution is inevitable, much as one should be deeply cautious about constructing theories of rampant matriarchalism from fat little stone ladies when textiles, wood carvings and body decoration have long since decayed, let alone social structures and micro-environments.

Yes, there are limitations on what might have been thought which arise from simple ecological truths and which do permit some analogy from current indigenous activity but modern indigenes are not ancient peoples – though, to be fair, Lewis-Williams does put in his own caveats here.

But the real warning signs that we may be jumping too far ahead in our thought processes lies in the closing words of the book.

The author quotes Julian Jaynes in his claim that we see a break in consciousness in the break between the Iliad and the Odyssey in order to make his own claim. Oh dear! What is it with academics who take textual history as human history?

Forget Jaynes. Lewis-Williams dumps text but replaces it with art, equally unwarrantably. There is no evidence of actual brain structures changing very much in thousands of years for the simple reason that brain structure is an evolved function and evolution is a slow and wasteful process.

Indeed, Lewis-Williams’ core argument depends on comparative consciousness studies that assume such long range structural similarities for them to make any sense - and yet here we have appeal to the sort of radical view of consciousness change that appeals to New Agers.

Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens will have had very different modes of consciousness because of their different speciation (meaning different brain structures) but we see no necessity for the nature of the sapient form to provide more than the fact of art rather than its precise forms.

This does not diminish the thesis that rock art forms have some derivation from altered states and that, possibly (which I find plausible), 'artists' and shamans could manipulate social conditions to their own benefit. Both those propositions are highly plausible.

I have no doubt that homo sapiens has heard ‘inner voices’ in the palaeolithic age but we are equally certain that those ‘inner voices’ are not of one kind that morphs into another kind over time but were as variant then amongst individuals as they are now.

The artistic impulse may just as likely then, as now, be much more complex in its relationship to so-called spiritual, magical and community impulses than we like to think. Lewis-Williams’ theorizing seems plausible but, I repeat, we should not be seduced into believing we know.

What we have to be careful of is assuming that the rock art we see and the social change being postulated is quite so neatly connected as the theory suggests. The truth – we do not, cannot and never will know. In some cases, they may be and, in others, not. Grand narratives are presumptuous.

Nevertheless, though perhaps a trifle intellectually confused at the end (simply pushing Jaynes back a few thousand years with no sounder evidence than Jaynes has for the claims he makes), this book is still highly recommended.

It is full of scholarly and intelligent material on a number of related issues – Western European cave art itself, consciousness studies, the history of archaeology and the rock art of Africa and the Americas. There is easily enough evidence to come to an independent view of one’s own. show less

Super helpful, practical advice. I really appreciated White hammering on the distinction between decluttering and organizing. The thrust of the book is that decluttering is mostly about mindset, rather than process, is especially valuable to me. Not to disparage her process. The writing is clear and authentic, and the book is well organized, although she is at her best when she stops trying to be funny.