Masanobu Fukuoka (1913–2008)

It really is an amazing book. Ok, fine, not every detail of what Fukuoka proposes would work elsewhere, for example where there are harsh winters, but the idea of living simply, of letting nature guide farming practices, of not using chemicals and not tilling for a monoculture, is exceedingly valuable. And what a healthy way to live - eating hydroponic tomatoes and commuting to an office job and relaxing in front of the tv will kill you a lot faster than living on a few acres and growing show more your own food, relaxing by shelling peas kind of thing. I know, it sound corny, but in this gentleman's voice, it sounds not only lovely but plausible, even necessary.

From the introduction by Larry Korn: The fundamental distinction is that Mr. Fukuoka farms by cooperating with nature rather than trying to 'improve' upon nature by conquest."

A quote from Mr. F.: "When a decision is made to cope with the symptoms of a problem, it is generally assumed that the corrective measures will solve the problem itself. They seldom do." The examples given make it clear that we need to bear this in mind not just in farming, but in the rest of our lives. Get more fresh air and exercise, to make your whole body healthier, and you won't need to pop as many pills (which cost money which lack of sufficient causes one stress which makes one feel the need for more pills). We all know this - but Mr. F. encourages one to feel it strongly enough to begin to practice it.

Another example of how a person can live more completely and holistically by living more simply: "When it is understood that one loses joy and happiness in the attempt to possess them, the essence of natural farming will be realized. The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings."

Or try this: "In nature there is life and death, and nature is joyful. In human society there is life and death, and people live in sorrow."

Lest you think this is 'too deep' for you, note that there is humor, too. Mr. F. notes that Einstein was given the Nobel Prize for explaining something about physics. "His explanation is bewildering, however, and it caused people to think that the world is complex beyond all possible understanding. A citation of 'disturbing the peace of the human spirit' should have been awarded instead.'"" show less

Call it Zen and the Art of Farming or a Little Green Book, Masanobu Fukuoka s manifesto about farming, eating, and the limits of human knowledge presents a radical challenge to the global systems we rely on for our food. At the same time, it is a spiritual memoir of a man whose innovative system of cultivating the earth reflects a deep faith in the wholeness and balance of the natural world. As Wendell Berry writes in his preface, the book is valuable to us because it is at once practical show more and philosophical. It is an inspiring, necessary book about agriculture because it is not just about agriculture.

Trained as a scientist, Fukuoka rejected both modern agribusiness and centuries of agricultural practice, deciding instead that the best forms of cultivation mirror nature s own laws. Over the next three decades he perfected his so-called do-nothing technique: commonsense, sustainable practices that all but eliminate the use of pesticides, fertilizer, tillage, and per haps most significantly, wasteful effort.

Whether you re a guerrilla gardener or a kitchen gardener, dedicated to slow food or simply looking to live a healthier life, you will find something here you may even be moved to start a revolution of your own. show less

Au cours des 40 dernières années Masanobu Fukuoka a témoigné avec indignation de la dégénérescence de la terre et de la société japonaise. Comme un seul homme, les japonais ont suivi le modèle américain de développement économique et industriel, abandonnant leur riche héritage de travail simple et proche de la terre. Mais M. Fukuoka était déterminé à ne pas abandonner l'agriculture traditionnelle. Il l'affina, au contraire, à tel point que sa méthode d'agriculture sauvage show more demande moins de travail et cause moins de dégâts à la nature qu'aucune autre méthode tout en maintenant les mêmes rendements à l'hectare que les paysans voisins. Dans cet ouvrage d'une profonde sensibilité et qui fait réfléchir, M.Fukuoka décrit les évènements qui l'ont conduit à développer sa méthode d'agriculture sauvage et l'impact qu'elle a eu sur la terre, lui-même, et les milliers de personnes à qui il l'a enseignée. Il décrit la méthode elle-même et pourquoi il croit qu'elle offre un modèle pratique et stable de société basée sur la simplicité et la permanence. M. Fukuoka fait preuve d'une compréhension profonde des interactions entre l'agriculture et les autres aspects de la culture. Il sent que l'agriculture sauvage a son origine dans la santé spirituelle de l'individu. Il considère que la guérison de la terre et la purification de l'esprit humain sont la même chose et propose une manière de vivre et de cultiver où ce processus puisse se réaliser. Ce livre a pour but de changer les attitudes envers la nature, l'agriculture, la nourriture, la santé physique et spirituelle. show less

I've been hearing about this book for the past ten years, and finally got around to giving it a read through. It was well worth it! It's on par with Schumacher's "Small is Beautiful"—both in its elegance and significance.

Fukuoka was a scientist for the first part of his life, and a simple farmer for the second part. Although it seems as though he might be an atheist, the book is quite spiritual in nature.

Our author starts the book with the proclamation of a realization he had relatively show more early in life about human life being meaningless. The rest of this book stems from this realization, and the end of the book goes into further discussion on the topic.

I can't say I ever came to an understanding about what Fukuoka meant by this. He obviously has a lot of beliefs about what is meaningful, as he navigates the world with a decisive conscience. For example, he knows that chemical fertilizers are bad, and that natural food should be cheaper than industrial food. Also, his term, "do-nothing farming" is equally misleading. I've heard a similar saying about the lazy farmer being the farmer that accomplishes his work today so that he can rest tomorrow. That's not really the commonly-held understanding of lazy, and I don't think anyone could say Fukuoka did nothing on his farm.

I think what Fukuoka's getting at here is along the same lines of efficiency in effort and labor. The image of a master craftsman comes to mind planing a block of wood—his motions use the minimal required effort to accomplish his aim, and their execution is skillful and precise.

Fukuoka's observations about food and farming truly do call for a revolution. He proposes that 100% of humans should be farmers. He proposes that, when considering the term "natural food," we would do to remember that preparing food with heat and with salt is unnatural (so of course the "natural foods" we see in grocery stores today are nothing of the sort). Fukuoka himself lived on a property without running water or electricity, and his farm was almost entirely self-sufficient in regard to calories produced.

Sometimes I feel a little depressed reading books like this—if someone could have such a clearly-articled and broadly read critique of industrial agriculture and consumer culture back in the '70s and '80s, why are we in an even worse situation today? Conversely, even if my generation is able to understand the underlying trends at work in the world today, and live our lives accordingly, what difference will it make? Sometimes this line of thinking can lead to a sense of futility.

On the other hand, grandfathers of sustainable farming such as Fukuoka have been instrumental to movements such as the one today forming around regenerative agriculture.

A note on my interpretation of "sustainability" as inspired by Fukuoka's use of the term. Sustainability has become a word that is almost meaningless today. Many have been turning to the word "regenerative," claiming that regeneration goes beyond sustainability. I find this to be an unfair and inaccurate assessment of the term. Sustainability originally was a living-systems term describing the ability of a bioregion to sustain itself indefinitely, which requires dynamism, not stasis. Proponents of the term "regenerative" claim that they're "improving" systems—but only systems that have already been degraded by human action! Actually, the net impact of regeneration is only to try to attempt to bring a system back up to a level of functioning almost as good as it was before we messed it up! In other words, true sustainability requires regeneration—not the other way around! show less