Peter McWilliams (1949–2000)

I confess a libertarian bias, but so much libertarian writing is pompous and inaccessible that I have a difficult time introducing others to these ideas. This book does what so few manage to do; it brings libertarianism closer to the common sense simplicity at its heart. (For the philosophy-types about to flame me, that's not to say that there isn't a complex philosophy to be found in libertarianism, merely that heavy-handedness and obfuscation work no better at communication than Heidegger show more translations.) The quotes make this a great browser-book, entertaining and thought-provoking even for guests at my home who have other political leanings. show less

I think this is one–if not the–of the most important books that I have ever read. And I do not say that lightly. I’m weighing this single book against all the “great” books of the world, including that perennial bestseller, the Bible. Why is this book so important? Because of its terrifying immediacy. While I say this book is important, I mean here and now. It is my sincere hope that this book will become a historical document (like many of those great books); it is my fear that I show more am dreaming.

So what is so all-fired important? This book is a history and discussion about consensual crimes–that is, victimless crimes, or, as the author prefers, crimes in which the participants consented to the action. The distinction is necessary, and Peter McWilliams makes a point of clearly stating his position, codified in a single statement, which I will repeat for you here: “You should be able to do with your person or property whatever you please, as long as you don’t physically harm the person or property of another.” However, for such a simple statement, it is dangerously revolutionary with regard to our society today (but then, most revolutionary statements have been simple, like “Give me liberty or give me death” or “Thou shalt have no other gods before me”).

What at first glance might seem the height of liberalism–McWilliams is, after all, recommending the abolishment of laws against drug use, gambling, and prostitution, among others–is actually the basis of libertarianism. Yet McWilliams has solved the problem that I have always had with the libertarian movement, and that is their stand on the environment. Clearly many of the environmental rules and regulations would continue to stand if McWilliams had his way; pollution does physically harm the environment (and the persons) of others.

This book, for the simple nature of its argument, is no half-measure though. Although it is extremely readable, with an interesting layout (included a boxed quote for almost every page), it is still 800 pages. I didn’t feel like any of the material was extraneous, however, and sometimes wanted more detail. Some of the interesting details that were included:

• McWilliams documenting Jerry Falwell committing a “false witness” (lying) on national television;
• The history of hemp use (and the evolution of the propaganda on its abuse);
• The play-by-play description of a “Dragnet” episode in which a character dies of an LSD overdose, although there’s never been a documented case of such (some have died due to actions performed under the influence [similar to drunk driving?], but not of an overdose);
• “The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose.” The Bible, right? Wrong. Shakespeare, “The Merchant of Venice,” Act 1, Scene 3, Line 99.

While it isn’t necessary to agree completely with McWilliams (although you’ll be tempted; he is a very persuasive writer), the point is that if you agree with a single argument, it is enough to call for the abolishment of laws against consensual crimes. A strong statement, but clearly evidenced by the facts–that is, if you agree with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Is it needless to say that I highly recommend this book? No, I think I need to state it openly. Even if you don’t come to the same conclusions as McWilliams, I think it is vitally necessary that you make the effort to educate yourself regarding the history of these activities and the history of the laws against these activities. Given the amount of dis- and non-information that is available on drugs, prostitution, homosexuality, et al, even if the statistics that McWilliams quotes are only 10% accurate, the figures are still impressive.

This isn’t a “dry” book at all, even given the numerous quotes from founding fathers (both American and Biblical); McWilliams understands the necessity of humor (who said, “If I couldn’t laugh, I’d be crying”?). Thanks to Laurie Mann for recommending this book. show less

I read this book fifteen years ago and it still influences my thinking about political rights. A comprehensive and exhaustive argument for removing government from medling in morality, the book is an extremely well-researched primer on the constitution, the Bible, and American history. Despite the seriousness of the subject and the arguments, the book is an enjoyable read because McWilliams has a sharp and biting sense of humor that often manifests in sarcastic and snarky footnotes, plus show more page after page of great and relevant quotes on the subject at hand by celebrities and politicians. If every person in America read this book, we might actually have a shot of living in a sane and compassionate country. show less

Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do covers the facts on the politically-charged concept of victimless crimes.

Drugs, pornography, prostitution, and gambling. We make these things illegal in this country, because we assume it's the government's role to protect people from hurting themselves. But is this assumption correct?

I started this book as a conservative. The facts and history showed me I'd been lied to by mainstream advertisements, urban myths, and schools. I had many misconceptions that show more were quickly disillusioned by this book.

The conclusion: Adults should have the right to make choices about their own lives. Even if those choices seem harmful, stupid, or worthless, they have that right. Your freedom to swing your fist ends where my nose begins... but you should be able to hit your own nose all you want. show less