Picture of author.

About the Author

Masha Gessen is a Russian American journalist. She has written several books including The Man Without a Face: The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin, Words Will Break Cement: The Passion of Pussy Riot, and The Brothers: The Road to an American Tragedy. The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism show more Reclaimed Russia won the National Book Award for Nonfiction in 2017. (Bowker Author Biography) show less

Includes the names: Masha Gessen, Marsha Gessen

Disambiguation Notice:

Masha Gessen is nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns.

Image credit: Amazon

Works by M. Gessen

Surviving Autocracy (2020) 572 copies, 14 reviews
The Brothers: The Road to an American Tragedy (2015) 178 copies, 5 reviews
Gay Propaganda: Russian Love Stories (2014) — Editor — 23 copies
Spasibo (2013) — Author — 5 copies

Associated Works

We (1921) — Foreword, some editions — 9,990 copies, 247 reviews
Granta 64: Russia the Wild East (1998) — Contributor — 168 copies
Granta 88: Mothers (2005) — Contributor — 165 copies, 1 review
The Best American Essays 2019 (2019) — Contributor — 162 copies, 2 reviews
The Best American Nonrequired Reading 2017 (2017) — Contributor — 98 copies, 1 review
The Wall in My Head: Words and Images from the Fall of the Iron Curtain (2009) — Contributor — 57 copies, 4 reviews
The Best of Slate: A 10th Anniversary Anthology (2006) — Contributor — 29 copies, 2 reviews
In the Here and There (1992) — Translator, some editions — 12 copies, 2 reviews

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Canonical name
Gessen, M.
Legal name
Gessen, Maria Alexandrovna
Гессен, Мария Александровна
Other names
Gessen, M.
Birthdate
1967-01-13
Gender
non-binary
Education
Rhode Island School of Design
Cooper Union
Occupations
journalist
author
translator
Organizations
The New Yorker
Awards and honors
Tucholskypriset (Sverige 2013)
National Book Award
Hannah Arendt Prize (2023)
Agent
Elyse Cheney (Cheney Agency)
Relationships
Gessen, Keith (brother)
Nationality
Russia
USA
Birthplace
Moscow, Soviet Union
Places of residence
Moscow, Soviet Union
New York, New York, USA
Disambiguation notice
Masha Gessen is nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns.
Associated Place (for map)
New York, New York, USA

Members

Reviews

120 reviews
Fantastic, fast paced reporting on the Boston marathon bombing and everyone involved. It reads as a thriller. It began with historical context of growing up in different independent republics of Russia, destroyed by civil wars, xenophobia, and religious persecution. What is like to grow up with parents that come from that in America.

All is fair in immigration. Except one thing: You never talk about the pain of dislocation. You do no describe the way color drains out of everyday life when show more nothing is familiar, how the texture of living seems to dissapear.

Then it gives little biographies of the brothers, friends, acquantainces, and family members. Theory on terrorism and living in America as an immigrant, with muslim roots, in the middle of the War on Terror.

Common sense and human experience show that only a small minority of people who subscribe to radical ideas - even the kinds of radical ideas that justify and promote violence - actually engage in violence. Research also shows that some terrorist do not hold strong political or ideological beliefs.

And finally (and the most riveting part of the book) after talking about the little brother's friends hiding evidence, and a old friend of the older brother (that allegedly helped him kill three people), it goes into the FBI ways of taking action, conspiracy theories, and thinly veiled conclusions (because the FBI won't disclose anything, surprise surprise). Everything goes off the rails. And this author does a fantastic job explaining what she can by looking at the inconsistencies of the story.

...,the FBI may have created terrorists out of law-abiding individuals. In these cases, the informants and agents often seemed to choose targets based on their religious or political beliefs. They often chose targets who were particularly vulnerable - whether because of mental disability, or because they were indigent and needed money that the government offered them. From former FBI agent, Michael German.
show less
Russian is a language fit for many epithets of despair, with one of the darkest being a phrase that translates to 'no future'. Gessen tracks the fall of the Soviet Union and the rise of Vladimir Putin through the lives of several extraordinary Russians, extraordinary in the sense that they're gifted with sensitivity and insight into their own lives--though one of her subjects, Zhanna Nemtsova, daughter of murdered opposition leader Boris Nemtsov, would be exceptional in any time.

Gessen's show more first subject is the twilight of Communism. In her history, the Soviet Union was a society prohibited from knowing itself, except through the stale dogmatism of Marxist-Leninist thought. Rather than the flourishing self-knowledge produced by open media, fair elections, and robust social sciences, the Soviet Union was locked in a totalitarian dyad, between the central authorities of the state, who had the apparatus of terror at their control, and a semi-quiescent population, which took signals from the center to enforce conformity. The ultimate signal was that violence would be used to preserve the status quo, and a combination of Gorbachev's wavering through perestroika and the unwillingness of any political figure to give direct orders to the army and KGB to initiate a crackdown meant that the USSR dissolved, not quite bloodlessly, but without an expected civil war or systematic massacres.

Of course, the promised realities of liberalism, democracy, and capitalism failed to realize for many people. While material measures of quality of life went up, expectations went up even faster, and many Russians missed the surety of the old system. Yeltsin boozed his ways through the 90s, and then selected a little known KGB officer from St. Petersburg as he successor: Vladimir Putin.

Gessen covered Putin's ascent in The Man Without a Face, and this book is more about the consequences. The old Soviet nomenklatura had never really gone anywhere, and Putin brought them to heal. Putin recast the government in the mold of a mafia family, with himself as the patriarch. Oil profits buoyed consumer confidence, which allowed him to dispense benefices.

Meanwhile, Putin amped up a culture war in the name of traditional Russian and Eurasian values. The actual influence of anti-modern philosopher Alexander Dugin is hard to evaluate, but Putin used his language to declare war against homosexuality, and then actual war against Georgia and Ukraine. The most heartbreaking parts of a very sad book concern Lyosha, an openly gay professor of gender studies, who is forced to flee to America after several gay friends are viciously beaten as pedophiles.

Gessen has her own agenda, of course, and her psychoanalytic perspective on the Russian character is sui generis, but it also captures the weird contradictions of the New Right Populist Authoritarianism that more purely materialistic leave fuzzy. Even far outside Russia, it seems like the future is being swept under by a torrent of bitter debris from the failure of neoliberalism.
show less
‘The Future is History’ is a subtle and unusual work of contemporary history, if that isn’t too much of a tautology. Masha Gessen attempts to elucidate the last twenty years in Russia through the lives of four people who grew up after the fall of the USSR. It confirms the message of [b:Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible: The Surreal Heart of the New Russia|21413849|Nothing Is True and Everything Is Possible The Surreal Heart of the New Russia|Peter show more Pomerantsev|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1407196452s/21413849.jpg|40714614], that life under Putin is characterised by complete disorientation. Gessen discusses the nature of Putin’s regime from several angles, including consideration of whether it has an actual ideology and to what extent it is authoritarian. What emerges is a complex but fundamentally depressing picture. Whatever it is, Putinism has become more repressive, aggressive, and entrenched as the years have passed. Journalists and activists are at greater and greater risk of imprisonment, beatings, exile, and assassination. Most shockingly, homophobic rhetoric has intensified to a fever pitch on the basis of a hysterical hunt for paedophiles. One of the four subjects of the book is a gay academic who gradually finds his work ignored and suppressed. I hadn’t realised what a slew of virulently homophobic laws Russia had passed - LGBT people are apparently the current political scapegoat.

The study of social sciences in Russia is a theme throughout the book, as without them it is impossible to understand what’s happening to society and culture. A psychoanalyst considers the generational impact of Russia’s traumatic past, while a sociologist tries to capture public sentiment via surveys. Gessen avoids any simple or easy answers about Russia’s seeming fatalism and confused nostalgia. Not that these symptoms are unique to Russia (Brexit is certainly a manifestation of both), however their Russian version seems especially intense and peculiar. Gessen suggests that many think there is no future in the country and it’s best to leave; others that a return to the USSR is needed to restore perceived former glories. There is very little mention of Trump and Russia’s apparent interference in US politics, however the depiction of Putin’s regime made me realise that America is definitely becoming more like Russia. Trump has brought Putin’s hardcore nepotism to the US presidency, as well as his contradictory and aggressive rhetoric. Both seem to hold onto power, despite obviously terrible policies, by undermining institutions and inducing a disorientating cognitive dissonance. It’s funny that after the fall of the iron curtain Russia was expected to imitate the US. Now things are going the other way.

Geopolitics aren’t the focus of this book, though. It attempts to explain the life experiences of a few Russians in the context of national political changes, making no claims that these handful of people represent the population at large. Gessen asks why protests suddenly erupt, why they seemingly have no lasting consequences, and how nationalist sentiment waxes and wanes. She wonders why life expectancy in Russia is so bad and what happened during the invasion of Ukraine. All this is carefully woven together into a compelling narrative. There is something unsettling about reading a history that’s within my lifetime. It also makes the pseudo-objective distance of the historian impossible to manufacture, which I appreciated. Gessen tries to reconstruct and contextualise confused, suppressed, and poorly documented events in Russia from 1984 to today, no mean feat. I found ‘The Future is History’ a fascinating and unique read, one that made me more worried about Russia’s current geopolitical activities.
show less
This book is a monumental view into how Russia went from the Soviet Union, from ideals into politics, from politics into corruption, from communism to distorted socialism, and how distorted socialism turned into totalitarianism. It deals with this by mainly feeding into the reader's mind by invoking chronological storytelling from several lead characters, while letting one know what happens on a historical level.

This book reminded me of reading [a:Victor Klemperer|90845|Victor show more Klemperer|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1344607543p2/90845.jpg]'s diaries from before, during, and after WWII; the nazis did not sneak up and just take over everything in one breath; as with Stalin, Putin, and all politicians inbetween, change came slowly.

The book involves how Russia saw homosexuality as a kind of benchmark of totalitarianism, even though this is loftily used by myself in this review; where Boris Yeltsin's government lifted laws against "homosexual acts", they were soon reinstated when a more desperate and cynical government took power.

It's interesting to see how the Soviet Union decided to take care of its inglorious past of sorts:

In 1989, Gorbachev made Alexander Nikolaevich chair of a newly created Rehabilitation Commission, in charge of reviewing archival documents and clearing the names of those who had been unjustly punished in the Stalin era. Alexander Nikolaevich was better prepared than Gorbachev to start learning about the terror, both because he was old enough to have heard Khrushchev deliver his secret speech to the Party Congress and because he had seen the cattle cars carrying Soviet prisoners of war to the Gulag after the Great Patriotic War.

But what he saw when he studied the archives during perestroika made his stomach turn. He saw that Stalin personally had signed execution orders for forty-four thousand people, people he did not know and whose cases he had not read, if the cases even existed—he had simply signed off on long lists of names, apparently because he enjoyed the process.4 He saw evidence of secret-police competitions, formal ones—like when different departments within the NKVD (the precursor agency to the KGB) raced one another to highest number of political probes launched—and informal ones, like when three of the NKVD brass took three thousand cases with them on a train journey, got drunk, and engaged in a speed challenge: Who could go through a stack of cases fastest, marking each with the letter P. They were not reading the cases.

The letter P—pronounced r in Russian—stood for rasstrel, “execution.” He saw evidence of specific days on which the fate of thousands was decided. On November 22, 1937, Stalin and two of his closest advisers, Vyacheslav Molotov and Andrei Zhdanov, approved twelve lists submitted by the NKVD, containing 1,352 people who would be executed. On December 7, they signed off on thirteen lists for a total of 2,397 people, 2,124 of whom were to be executed. On January 3, 1938, they were joined by two other top Bolsheviks, Kliment Voroshilov and Lazar Kaganovich, and together they signed off on twenty-two lists with 2,547 names, 2,270 to be executed. June 10, 1938: twenty-nine lists, 2,750 people, 2,371 to be executed. September 12, 1938: thirty-eight lists, 6,013 people, 4,825 to be executed.

There were too many such dates and figures to make them commemorative or otherwise meaningful. Some lists had a specific makeup. On August 20, 1938, Stalin and Molotov together signed off on a list of fifteen women who were classified as “wives of enemies of the people.” Ten of them were housewives and two were students. All were executed. Their husbands, who had been arrested earlier, were executed later. Other lists looked altogether random, though the mind scrambled each time to make sense of them.


Hannah Arendt is quoted throughout the book, understandably so because of her enormous studies and publications on totalitarianism:

Hannah Arendt had written about the way totalitarianism robs people of the ability to form opinions, to define themselves as distinct from other members of society or from the regime itself.


One of the main persons in the book, Lyosha, has some ferocious things to say in the face of vicious adversity:

The university, too, developed a vision of itself as a European institution. Lyosha knew that he fit in it well. His own vision was that he would soon be running Russia’s only LGBT Studies program. For now, he and Darya, the friend who had been teaching the one gender studies course, launched a gender studies center. It helped that Darya’s father was the dean of another department at the university. Darya and Lyosha got some funding for hosting conferences and publishing the proceedings. Their publications had no official status in the university, but this meant that they did not have to face an academic-review board.

Lyosha was lucky. He had heard that a legal scholar in Novosibirsk had not been allowed to defend her dissertation on LGBT rights.11 In 2010, Lyosha presented at a conference at Moscow State University. His paper was titled “Gender Gaps in Political Science.” Only one person—a professor from St. Petersburg—had a question for him. “Are you aware,” she asked, “that there are no lesbians in Russia?” “I’ve also heard,” said Lyosha, “that there was no sex in the Soviet Union. Yet you are here.” When the conference collection was published in book form, his paper was omitted.


It's interesting to see how oligarchies speed up law making when it leads to simpler control of people:

On May 10, while Putin was at UralVagonZavod, the parliament was asked to pass a set of amendments to the Law on Public Gatherings. They raised the fines for violating rules on public gatherings to as much as the equivalent of $1,500—backbreaking for most Russians—and they changed the definition of “public gathering” to allow the police to classify any group of people as engaging in one. The bill sped through parliament like probably no piece of legislation ever had. It became law on June 9, three days before a protest march planned to commemorate Russia’s 1990 declaration of sovereignty.


Overall, this book is like a vice and wrench to understanding Russia in the modern age, allowing the reader to quickly understand get how things turned out the way they did. It's also near poetic at times, with a proseaic touch. It's very well written and the author is talented with a keen analytical mind. This is firmly recommended to all.
show less

Lists

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
32
Also by
9
Members
3,932
Popularity
#6,431
Rating
3.9
Reviews
110
ISBNs
169
Languages
19
Favorited
6

Charts & Graphs