Author picture

J. P. McEvoy (1)

Author of Introducing Quantum Theory

For other authors named J. P. McEvoy, see the disambiguation page.

6 Works 1,365 Members 13 Reviews

Works by J. P. McEvoy

Introducing Quantum Theory (1996) 793 copies, 8 reviews
Introducing Stephen Hawking (1995) 373 copies, 3 reviews
Brief History of the Universe (2010) 127 copies, 1 review
La théorie quantique (2014) 7 copies

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Canonical name
McEvoy, J. P.
Gender
male

Members

Reviews

15 reviews
This is the third review of a related title in the ‘Introducing …’ series, and like the others follows the familiar format of mixed text and cartoon style graphics. Its aim is to provide grounding in the subject that can be easily read in a day.

I found this title rather less accessible than the related titles Introducing Chaos and Introducing Fractal Geometry. This may be because the nature of the topic is inherently more difficult or because I found the ideas slightly less relevant show more to the subject of change and was therefore less willing to access the ideas.

The book deals with the development of quantum theory, the structure and behaviour of matter at the atomic level. It provides a useful description of the key players involved and the interaction as ideas are developed almost like the passing of the baton in a relay. An idea being challenged, added to, discarded or built upon as physicists throughout the 20th century and particularly its first half, struggle to build their understanding of matter. The description follows the various ideas, each of which provided a step along the process of learning, some to be discarded as thinking moved on, others still part of our current understanding.

Though some of the detail, even in this brief primer, may be a little difficult to fathom, at the heart of our understanding of the nature of matter are two key ideas, perhaps two design principles that appear to underpin everything. These ideas are uncertainty and connectedness.

Of course I could just be seeing these ideas, these connections, because they are what I am receptive to. Perhaps this is an example that we see what we want to see, what we are able or prepared to see, and here is another connection. I was intrigued by the description of work on understanding the nature of light, which in some ways behaves as a wave, and in some ways behaves as a particle. The resolution of this paradox is that it becomes either wave like or particle like, depending on how we choose to see it. The observer causes it to exist in that form. As Niels Bohr put it,
“Whether an object behaves as a wave or a particle depends on your choice of apparatus for looking at it”

As for connectedness, some of the mathematics suggests the idea of non-locality, that all matter is connected. Interaction does not diminish with distance and acts simultaneously without crossing space. Matter on one side of the universe, knows all about matter on the other side of the universe and they act together.

The validity and consequences of this amazing idea are still being explored, but it raises fascinating questions about our concepts of connectedness, and our apparent preference to dissect our world and avoid the realities of a jagged edged world of chaos.

This is an interesting little book, the ideas of which compliment those in Introducing Chaos and Introducing Fractal Geometry, but may perhaps be the least immediately relevant of the three for those seeking to extend their thinking.
show less
Prompted by last week's total eclipse over the US, I dug out this little book from the back of my bookshelf, published just before the last total eclipse visible from the UK in 1999 (we hadn't seen one before from this country since 1927 and we won't see another one until 2090). From central London where I worked in 1999 and still work, the eclipse was disappointing; we all went out into St James Park (between Whitehall and Buckingham Palace) but it was a cloudy day, with no visible sun and show more the sky merely darkened as it might before a thunderstorm...so a disappointment. Anyway, I digress - this book is part science, part history and the most striking aspect for me was the significance that eclipses have had for all civilisations starting from the Babylonians who first recorded eclipses on clay tablets, many thousands of which survive to this day, as signs from the gods, then later coming to see patterns and analyse and predict future eclipses. Though there is some slightly dry science in this, there are also interesting vignettes of prominent astronomers and other scientists whose work has influenced, and/or been influenced by eclipses. show less
The book makes for a nice reading at leisure. It suites complete beginers to physics or people with no science background as they get to follow the creation of a genius in view of the theories he proposes. Following the line of theories that make our present understanding of the cosmos today is a great journey put into the book with astonishing clarity and ease.
Even people with a physics background will find the development of the story interesting and the graphics just makes it better.
This book covers the history of astronomy from about 1800 BC to the present. The author describes the personalities of the astronomers and their advances in understanding of our universe. It is interesting to hear about how many incorrect theories persisted due to bias and a lack of scientific information. The author demonstrates a deep understanding of astrophysics and is able to write in a manner that is clear and interesting.
½

Lists

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Oscar Zarate Illustrator

Statistics

Works
6
Members
1,365
Popularity
#18,834
Rating
½ 3.5
Reviews
13
ISBNs
34
Languages
9

Charts & Graphs