John Leland (4) (1959–)

What a lovely book about being very old.

I recently read an article by John Leland and it was so well written I decided to see if he had written any books. I found this one, and it is lovely.

He spent a year with six very different, very old people, and wrote about what he learned from them. I learned a great deal from them in the process myself.

I am not very old yet, but I am old enough to see my life changing already, and this book tells me it’s not what I imagine.

A clear, candid, show more thoughtful book that was a pleasure to read. Recommended. show less

I hope that people don't dismiss Happiness Is a Choice You Make as another bit of platitudinous fluff based on the title. It is by far the best non-fiction book I've read this year. If you can get a paper copy as well as the audiobook, I highly recommend it. I started out reading a library copy, and loved seeing pictures of "the elders," but life got in the way of my having enough time to sit and make much progress with it, so I downloaded it on Audible and finished up that way. The narrator show more (who is not the author) does a great job, and has a warm, pleasing voice, but the surprise at the end is really what made the audio copy worth any price you pay. show less

As I creep closer to this age group and have a mother who is turning 98 soon, I thought it would be interesting to read a study the journalist John Leland made of one of the fastest growing age groups in America, those between 85 and 94. What an intriguing study as Leland chose a cross mix of women/men, well-off/disadvantaged, religious/not so much and included a racial mix of black, Chinese, immigrants, etc. Of course with only 6 participants this is not a scientific study but it did probe show more many pertinent ideas on how the oldest of the old are viewed and how they view themselves. His year long visits to these six participants revealed that in spite of many pain causing infirmities, limited mobility, and lack of family support that the individuals always found what seemed to be simple things to make life worth living. He makes the point that none of us know what will sustain us when we get older and that those who point out the elderly don't have much quality of life make these assumptions from a younger person's point of view. Leland's own elderly mother was often mentioned and this portrayed how hard it is for family members to really listen to the wants and needs of their aged relatives as Leland readily admits. He also admits that having a purpose in life is probably one of the most important traits we can have but that purpose might be as simple as enjoying as much as we can where we find ourselves at any point in time. Great ideas but I sometimes wondered how I would have interpreted the participants views and statements. I didn't always agree that their viewpoints were interpreted correctly by Leland. Also this is not a book about those in excruciating pain such as with cancer which is another topic entirely. Even so I recommend this book to anyone interested in a view that yes we lose many things as we age but still as Jonas, one of the participants says, "Have you ever thought about how amazing, really amazing, life is?" show less

In 2015, reporter John Leland spent a year interviewing six seniors age 85 and older (the "oldest old") for a series of articles that appeared in the New York Times. Here, he expands on those articles and the lessons he, as a middle-aged man, hopes to take from each of them - including the greater contentment that comes with age.

The first half of the book is wide-ranging, dealing in broad strokes nad grand themes such as gratitude and love in old age. Leland includes quotes from "his" show more seniors as well as recent studies on the topics he's addressing. The second half is "Lessons from" Fred Jones, John Sorenson, Helen Moses, Ping Wong, Ruth Willig and Jonas Mekas. These seniors are a diverse group in background and ethnicity, and they had some insights on love of life and acceptance of death. The book didn't quite live up to my expectations. Perhaps it was the format - because of that division, I found it repetitive. But I think part of it was that Leland's original bias was to think of how much you lose in old age, leading to a revelation that in fact, despite loss, older people are still happy. I've had the privilege of knowing my maternal grandparents well into adulthood, and both reached their 80s (my grandmother has since passed away). So I never had the negative associations with old age that Leland did: I saw them losing some abilities, but overall being quite happy, having purpose and reason to get up in the morning. And, after my grandmother passed away, I've seen my grandfather stay motivated by playing cards at the senior center and seeing a lady friend on a regular basis. Maybe I was just expecting too much from the book. It may be of interest to people who enjoyed Tuesdays with Morrie or Being Mortal. And learning about Jonas Mekas alone was worth the read. show less