Ann Rule (1935–2015)

This was Rule's first book and it truly launched her career in true crime, though she had been a true crime magazine writer before. And before that, she was a cop.
Rule had volunteered at a crisis hotline in the early 70's and happened to work many of the same shifts as a young student named Ted Bundy. Like lots of women, Rule enjoyed Bundy's company, though because of their age difference, Rule saw him as an interesting friend, not a potential boyfriend. She didn't recognize that he was a show more sociopath.
This book covers more than 15 years of both Rule and Bundy's lives, in which Rule gets divorced, goes to Hollywood to write her first screenplay, raises her children and pursues her career as a writer. Bundy became a transient murderer and rapist who kidnapped, tortured and killed young women and a twelve year-old child. Law enforcement was often outmatched by Bundy, both because he could appear so normal and blend in, but also because once he was in custody they expected him to behave like a normal person, not to starve himself to fit through a tiny hole in the ceiling, or to jump out a two story window, which he did.
Bundy's multiple trials are included, for which Rule had a press pass. Bundy's ability to antagonize one minute and plead for mercy the next is on full display, and we see a man who prized his own skin above all else.

I've always found it confusing to hear Bundy described as handsome, as he is by many women here, including Rule. I don't get it, he's always looked like a thin-lipped, scrawny nerd to me, not good-looking at all.
I'm also a little on the fence about Rule's friendship with Bundy, which lasted for years and saw them exchange many letters and phone calls even while he was being charged with a litany of horrible crimes. Rule includes many of Bundy's written passages and transcribes many of their phone calls, which makes me lean towards the obvious, that Rule, and especially, Bundy were using each other. Rule wanted to get a career as a book author started and she happened to know a serial killer. Most people, especially women of that time, would have run the other way when a guy they knew was accused of murdering women, but Rule seems to have hung onto Bundy with both hands, claiming she didn't believe in his guilt for years, even in spite of her having worked with many of the cops who were charging Bundy. To me, it defies belief that a former cop who writes up crime cases thought that he could be wrongly charged with so many heinous crimes by multiple states. She wanted the story, and to get it, she had to be Bundy's friend so he'd keep in contact with her. And Bundy, knowing Rule talked to her former co-workers often, used Rule to get inside information about how much the police knew, but he also surely knew she would write about him and he wanted to be famous.
I have the anniversary edition, which has an epilogue, an afterward and a new final chapter, making it a real doorstop. It's a remarkable feat in true crime writing and I see why it's a famous book. show less

Technically this book is likely more of a 4 star read than anything else. It is incredibly engaging, horrifying, and accessibly written. The contents of the book never truly get dull, instead they simply keep increasing in severity and terror until the book finally comes to its incredibly drawn out ending. That isn't to say the ending is bad per se, it is simply long-winded. Unfortunately, it needs to be considering the amount of updates between its first publication and Ted Bundy reaching show more his inevitable conclusion.

I knew very little about Ted Bundy when I first picked up this book. Now, I feel as if I know a bit too much. Nevertheless, in spite of how much information is packed into these near 700 pages at the end Ted Bundy is as much as an enigma as he always has been. He's impossible to pin down, and [a: Ann Rule|9678|Ann Rule|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1492230915p2/9678.jpg] characterizes this chameleon like quality of the man rather well. Many criticize this book as being too kind towards Ted, but I feel Rule's view of him is understandable considering the circumstances under which she first met him - and over the course of the book her views naturally evolve. I think pairing this book with another study of Bundy would likely give a better picture of the man, although ultimately it's impossible to truly understand anyone who did what he did. We're probably lucky that knowing him is something we'll never do.

I certainly wouldn't like to know him. show less

Ann Rule never disappoints in her true crime writing. It is terrifying when you realize her monsters are all too real. She has seen the monsters, listening to court cases, interviewing survivors and the loved ones of their victims, and manages to tell the tale. This one does not disappoint. The handsome dentist who loses his wife. Oh, wait. This is the second wife he has lost? What poor luck the man has! Except, it's not poor luck...

I’ve read other Ann Rule books but somehow never got around to this, probably her most famous. It wasn’t as riveting as I expected considering the hype/infamy of Bundy and how she knew him.

The first half of the book is slow because it mostly deals with Ann’s background with Bundy and what she knew of his life as it intersected with her own. However, most of the book bogged down with back and forth over whether she believed him. She repeated ad nauseum how she couldn’t believe the man show more she knew had committed these crimes, but then pivoted to say how she was swayed by the detectives’ beliefs and circumstantial evidence against him. In fact, she didn’t seem to be fully convinced until he finally confessed right before his execution -and that was in one of the epilogues written years after publication! It is well publicized that Bundy was extremely charismatic and often swayed people to his side, but I found her hand-wringing less credible (and downright annoying) as the book went on. I expect such denial from his mother, but not a former policewoman, current crime writer who had close relationships with many investigators on the case. It went way beyond trying to be objective.

The second half went by more quickly as Ann finally began piecing together the disappearances and murders with the investigation and Bundy’s known whereabouts. This was the part I found most interesting – how they stopped him. However, the annoyance of the first half gave way to disgust in the second half. Bundy’s crimes were beyond horrific, but I found HER actions increasingly disturbing. She went above and beyond trying to help him, even as her doubts became substantial and the evidence mounted. She kept up a running correspondence, especially while he was incarcerated. She sent him money with nearly every letter: “How many $10 checks had I sent over the years?” After he was arrested in Florida, she became convinced he was ready to confess if only he could be brought back to Washington to a mental hospital – which she endeavored to make happen by calling state authorities and investigators she knew, asking them to intercede. “I tried, literally, to save his life.” In a way, I felt like she was one of the Bundy groupies she made point of pitying. Moreover, she went after Florida with a vengeance: “Florida, the “Buckle of the Death Belt” – was the worst possible state to which he could have run.” This seems overzealous because it wasn’t the only state with the death penalty. Colorado, where he had been on trial for murder, also had the death penalty. However, it had decided to remove that option from consideration in his trial. She goes on to describe that Aspenites had found him to be a “lovable rogue.” Yeah, a lovable rogue that brutally slaughtered dozens of women. I would have expected her to be frustrated with Colorado – the state that let him escape custody TWICE; the second time of which led directly to the murders he committed in Florida. But she was more concerned with how his escape led to him being arrested in a state that fully intended to use the death penalty if it convicted him.

The epilogues (and there are several in this edition) help to mitigate some of my feelings in that second half as she provided the fallout on years of appeals and his confessions before execution. She finally accepted what he did, and I can understand regret and sadness over who he could have been, but it wasn’t enough to redeem this book for me. show less