Picture of author.

Robert Scholes

Author of The Nature of Narrative

45+ Works 1,469 Members 17 Reviews 1 Favorited

About the Author

Robert Scholes is Research Professor of Modern Culture and Media at Brown University. He is the author of many books of literary theory. (Bowker Author Biography)
Image credit: Brown University

Works by Robert Scholes

The Nature of Narrative (1966) 157 copies
Protocols of Reading (1989) 66 copies
Elements of Fiction (1968) — Editor — 64 copies
The Practice of Writing (1981) 60 copies
The Crafty Reader (2001) 56 copies
Writing through Literature (2001) 34 copies
Structural Fabulation (1975) 26 copies
Paradoxy of Modernism (2006) 22 copies
Elements of Poetry (1765) 20 copies
Elements of Drama (1971) 16 copies
FABULATION & METAFICTION (1979) 12 copies
Some Modern Writers (1971) 7 copies
In Search of James Joyce (1992) 6 copies
The fabulators (1967) 6 copies
Elements of Writing (1656) 5 copies
Elements of the essay (1969) 4 copies

Associated Works

Dubliners (1914) — Editor, some editions — 19,714 copies
Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama (1995) — Contributor, some editions — 925 copies
The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary Genre (1970) — Introduction, some editions — 446 copies
Nebula Award Stories 10 (1975) — Contributor, some editions — 106 copies
Science Fiction: A Collection of Critical Essays (1976) — Author — 37 copies
Future Females: A Critical Anthology (1981) — Contributor — 17 copies
Studies in Bibliography (Vol. 16) (1963) — Contributor; Contributor, some editions — 2 copies
Studies in Bibliography (Vol. 17) — Contributor — 2 copies
Studies in Bibliography (Vol. 15) — Contributor — 2 copies

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Members

Reviews

Nims on late Yeats is particularly good, and Hugh Kenner's "Art in a Closed Field" is a concise and entertaining summary of his views on the links between aesthetics and technology. Today it reads like a modernist response to prophets of interactive fiction and other post-modern devices.
½
 
Flagged
jwm24 | Aug 3, 2013 |
This review was written for LibraryThing Early Reviewers.
I really appreciated Scholes's consideration of the place of the English Department in an academic world that's increasingly about students studying the practical, the career-oriented. On the one hand, I agree with him that the teaching of reading and the teaching of writing retain a significant importance, even if we become more and more a "service" department. I agree that the modernist privileging of difficult works needs to be dethroned, and that cultural studies should become an important part of what English departments do. On the other, many of his examples struck me as quixotic in the extreme, to the point of derailing his arguments. The first few chapters are absolutely the strongest.… (more)
 
Flagged
chelseagirl | 10 other reviews | Jun 13, 2012 |
This review was written for LibraryThing Early Reviewers.
In this slim volume, Scholes presents his plea for the continuing relevance of the humanities as both a body of scholarship and a uniquely powerful tool for understanding and sorting the information with which we are daily saturated. Scholes deftly analyzes of a variety of different forms, from scripture to opera, in defense of his position that textuality -- what people really read and write -- rather than literature, should be the proper object of instruction in literature courses.
 
Flagged
dianegreco | 10 other reviews | Mar 6, 2012 |
This review was written for LibraryThing Early Reviewers.
LibraryThing user dekesolomon's review of English After the Fall is succinct and accurate - unlike Scholes' own treatise on the evolution of English studies. The premise of Robert Scholes' text is one I certainly agree with - he identifies a need for English department to evolve, both for their own survival and for the benefit of students. As one of the "lowly" adjuncts both Scholes and Deke identify, I have very strong opinions about the state of compositional studies, and some specific ideas about how to change things for the good of all; I do not think Scholes would agree with many of my assessments.

Scholes suggests that the way to extend the life of English departments is to look beyond the traditional canon and recognize other genres as texts worthy of study. This would likely have been a radical idea twenty years ago, but my own experiences as a student suggest that Scholes is behind the curve; I, for example, took courses on Japanese theatre, contemporary fiction, American travel narratives, and a host of other genres that are traditionally "nonliterary" as an undergraduate, and continue to use "nonliterary" sources in my own courses. Much of Scholes' arguments are lost in his enthusiasm for specific texts, and for a reader unfamiliar with the operas and films on which he fixates, his text as a whole loses its power.

Whiles Scholes certainly identifies many of the problems now facing English departments, his "solution" seems to aggravate many of the current difficulties of teaching the subject by continuing to present material that undergraduates will not find compelling (i.e. opera), as opposed to addressing some of the most immediate concerns: a need for students to learn how to communicate effectively, whether or not they pursue English courses beyond the requirements of Freshman Composition.
… (more)
 
Flagged
London_StJ | 10 other reviews | Jan 2, 2012 |

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
45
Also by
9
Members
1,469
Popularity
#17,487
Rating
3.9
Reviews
17
ISBNs
97
Languages
3
Favorited
1

Charts & Graphs