1knerd.knitter
LT's resident chart guru has added a new chart to the series page!
At the bottom of the main series page, there is now a chart that displays the number of copies of each work that were added over specified time periods. You can view only Core works or All works in a series and display the data by Year, Quarter, or Month.
How popular is your favorite series on LT?
At the bottom of the main series page, there is now a chart that displays the number of copies of each work that were added over specified time periods. You can view only Core works or All works in a series and display the data by Year, Quarter, or Month.
How popular is your favorite series on LT?
3timspalding
Some I've found:
* The ascent of Elephant and Piggie https://www.librarything.com/nseries/2232/Elephant-and-Piggie
* The HUGE ascent of Bridgerton https://www.librarything.com/nseries/728/Bridgertons
* Dune is rising, but "Dune" itself is always dominant https://www.librarything.com/nseries/24/Dune
* I have no idea why For Dummies spikes every 3 years https://www.librarything.com/nseries/622/For-Dummies
* Calvin and Hobbes https://www.librarything.com/nseries/355/Calvin-and-Hobbes
Calvin and Hobbes is something we've noticed. Certain books/authors/genres were cataloged a lot on LT early on, then declined. Note that it's NOT about numbers per se; the graphs are by percent. Other ones rise. I think it's a combination of changing demographics, changing tastes and the effect of members cataloging their back-collections early and then mostly new acquisitions. But it's interesting.
Note that this only takes non-deleted books into account.
* The ascent of Elephant and Piggie https://www.librarything.com/nseries/2232/Elephant-and-Piggie
* The HUGE ascent of Bridgerton https://www.librarything.com/nseries/728/Bridgertons
* Dune is rising, but "Dune" itself is always dominant https://www.librarything.com/nseries/24/Dune
* I have no idea why For Dummies spikes every 3 years https://www.librarything.com/nseries/622/For-Dummies
* Calvin and Hobbes https://www.librarything.com/nseries/355/Calvin-and-Hobbes
Calvin and Hobbes is something we've noticed. Certain books/authors/genres were cataloged a lot on LT early on, then declined. Note that it's NOT about numbers per se; the graphs are by percent. Other ones rise. I think it's a combination of changing demographics, changing tastes and the effect of members cataloging their back-collections early and then mostly new acquisitions. But it's interesting.
Note that this only takes non-deleted books into account.
4paradoxosalpha
I love Mo Willems' books, and Elephant and Piggie are outstanding.
(Pigeon is good for teaching that books are fun and for amusing everyone to death, but Elephant and Piggie run right across the boundary of actual reading.)
(Pigeon is good for teaching that books are fun and for amusing everyone to death, but Elephant and Piggie run right across the boundary of actual reading.)
6r.orrison
Is the number for 2022 just for the year so far, or is it a pro-rata figure for the whole year? It's interesting that the three examples above have all gone up from 2021 to 2022 even though it's still less than half way through the year.
7timspalding
It’s percent of books added, so, yes, effectively prorated. It puts all years on the same footing. (But you can see the actual numbers as you mouse over it.)
8Stevil2001
This is fun!
9timspalding
Thanks.
10aspirit
I saw one before I saw this thread.
https://www.librarything.com/nseries/23091/Haikyu%21%21
Look how pretty those ribbony lines are!
https://www.librarything.com/nseries/23091/Haikyu%21%21
Look how pretty those ribbony lines are!
12Nicole_VanK
Just dropping by to say I like it :)
13gilroy
Interesting. Harry Potter is a downward slope...
14MarthaJeanne
https://www.librarything.com/nseries/85872/mandelbaums-kleine-gourmandisen tends to get several new titles twice a year. (It's single ingredient cookbooks.)
15AndreasJ
>13 gilroy:
Not very surprising for a series that “everyone” already has.
I’m more curious why there was an uptick in ‘16?
Not very surprising for a series that “everyone” already has.
I’m more curious why there was an uptick in ‘16?
16MarthaJeanne
>15 AndreasJ: Harry Potter and the Cursed Child publication date.
17paradoxosalpha
>13 gilroy:, >15 AndreasJ:, >16 MarthaJeanne:
The gimmick for Harry Potter was for the books to be issued on a schedule so that that the hero matured with the reading audience (with corresponding changes to the prose style and plot focus). The appeal of the series is therefore concentrated in a specific cohort.
The gimmick for Harry Potter was for the books to be issued on a schedule so that that the hero matured with the reading audience (with corresponding changes to the prose style and plot focus). The appeal of the series is therefore concentrated in a specific cohort.
18MarthaJeanne
>17 paradoxosalpha: That was my youngest son. Harry Potter turned him into a reader.
19elenchus
>3 timspalding:
Very interesting about both Dummies and Calvin & Hobbes. If that holds for Dummies, the Publisher would do well to understand that, for sure.
Dummies also raises the idea that having a collapsible section for the list of works would be useful, but I'm not sure how many series it would be so pronounced. That is a long list to scroll down before coming to the chart, if I wasn't looking for it specifically I never would have kept going.
Very interesting about both Dummies and Calvin & Hobbes. If that holds for Dummies, the Publisher would do well to understand that, for sure.
Dummies also raises the idea that having a collapsible section for the list of works would be useful, but I'm not sure how many series it would be so pronounced. That is a long list to scroll down before coming to the chart, if I wasn't looking for it specifically I never would have kept going.
20timspalding
Honestly, I think HP's longevity is the story.
* The first came out in 1997, the last in 2007, 15 years ago.
* So far in 2022 they occupy #1 and 7 of the 10 most cataloged books ( https://www.librarything.com/zeitgeist/popularity )
* In the US public-library data we collect, which comes from thousands of libraries, the first HP is at #15 for 2021. This despite there being so many used copies floating around that bookstores turn them away! If you add them all together, they'd be at #1. https://about.proquest.com/en/blog/2021/top-syndetics-unbound-titles-of-2021/
* The first came out in 1997, the last in 2007, 15 years ago.
* So far in 2022 they occupy #1 and 7 of the 10 most cataloged books ( https://www.librarything.com/zeitgeist/popularity )
* In the US public-library data we collect, which comes from thousands of libraries, the first HP is at #15 for 2021. This despite there being so many used copies floating around that bookstores turn them away! If you add them all together, they'd be at #1. https://about.proquest.com/en/blog/2021/top-syndetics-unbound-titles-of-2021/
21your.leonagranda
Thanks)
22benjclark
Ok, the For Dummies chart is really interesting ... Are we all on a 3-year cycle of "I could use a little help with this ..." we buy the book, we try it, it's OK, and we move on to something else and then realize we could use a little help, and ...
23Petroglyph
Ooh, nice. Off to explore a few graphs!



