Ash: A Secret History

https://nwhyte.livejournal.com/3564209.html

At first sight this appears to be set in the fifteenth century of our own era. Ash, a teenage mercenary commander, has taken strategic advice for years from voices in her head and as a result is one of the most successful mercenaries in Western Europe. But the near-future (ie early 2000's) researchers who are trying to compose a new biography gradually realise that her history is not their history, and the two realities begin to leach into each other. This book gave me very strange dreams when I first read it; my dreams have generally been strange this year so I didn't notice any difference this time. Admittedly the history and presentation are dodgy - I doubt that any of the female mercenary show more commanders of the fifteen century were still teenagers, and the whole thing is presented as a translation, complete with scholarly footnotes for difficult bits, from a manuscript which is not written in the style of any medieval text. I'm also a bit better informed about medieval Burgundy than I was twenty years ago, thanks to Van Loo and Dunnett. But in the end I love the intensity of description and the leakage between realities. It's awfully long, but I found myself thinking at one point, oh no, there's only 250 pages left to go. show less

When people ask the dreaded 'what's your favourite book question', this is one of my stand-by answers. And it's not just a throw-away line because it honestly is. I don't usually go for historical fiction but this alternate-history/fantasy-history grabbed me and compelled me the entire way through. I'd only read one other Mary Gentle novel, Grunts, before this, and this was both so different and contained the things that made me enjoy that book. Ash is a fantastic character and not just because it's wonderful to read about a literal strong female character.

My three major issues fall under one umbrella: believability—which is not the same as realism. Obviously The Black Company is totally unrealistic, yet I believed every word of it.

One: the prose. Again! In short: Mary Gentle is no Ada Palmer. 15th-century (auto)biographies simply do not read like the text Gentle serves us – not even in the rough first draft of an English translation – as the frame story frames a big part of the novel. Okay, the scholar – historian Pierce Ratcliff – admits that he is quite liberal in the way he translates the Latin text, but even so, the alteration of dialogue, internal thoughts and third person perspective is a form that did not exist in the 15th century, and not one that a translator would be show more able to concoct on the fly. That form begins to appear at the end of the 18th century, and only reaches its full-fledged version with Jane Austen in the early 19th – the version Gentle anachronistically uses for Ash.

This is not a trivial matter: most of Ash’s detailed thoughts would have basically been invented by the translator, and as such have no scientific value – even though Ratcliff has clear scientific ambitions with his translations.

So, for all the research about medieval cannons and armor, Gentle could have upped her ante, and done some research into her own craft: writing. That might have made the novel harder to read, but more conceptually sound. A lesser alternative could have been an explicit reference – in the form of elaborate translator’s notes for instance – to a huge modernization of the text, coupled with a different backstory for the second manuscript, one that would have granted a realistic time frame for the stylistic transformation.

Two: Ratcliff, the scientist, acts like a gullible, whiny child. It’s more than a matter of prose, or the way he writes his emails: his psychological profile and scientific rigor simply doesn’t fit an experienced, serious late 20th, early 21st-century historian. Anna Longman, his editor, also acts far too gullible about certain aspects of the narrative, aspects that have extremely profound implications for human reality. As both are foundational characters, Gentle’s choices for them basically destroy any realistic scaffolding of her framing device. I think this issue could have been fixed, but not without a higher page count.

Three: the overall scientific foundations. Is Ash science fiction, or simply science fantasy in a lab coat?

(...)

Full review on Weighing A Pig show less

Well this is truly great achievement. A staggeringly long work, but one well worth the read. Mary Gentle really brings out the grit and the clamour of late medieval combat (or is it early Renaissance?) The writing is wonderfully readable, no useful thing since there are over 1100 pages of it. The story is multi-layered and hugely entertaining. I did feel that some portions in the last quarter or so (during the siege) needed better editing. But all in all, this is one of the best fantasy novels I've read in a long while (though I suppose there is a strong case for classifying it as SF. Oh well, its still worth reading.)

First things first, Ash is long: 1113 pages with small print and hardly any margin space. According to the publisher's website it is, "the largest single fantasy work ever--longer even than The Lord of the Rings." In fact, in the United States it was published as four separate volumes: A Secret History, Carthage Ascendant, The Wild Machines, and Lost Burgundy. While these are perhaps a little easier to handle, Ash really works best as single volume, which means a significant amount of time will need to be set aside to read it; this is not light reading!

Pierce Ratcliff is a medieval historian who is working on a new translation of the documents that recount the life of Ash, a nineteen year old mercenary captain. Outside of these show more documents, little is known about her. But, he has recently discovered a new text, perhaps written or dictated by Ash herself, that fills some gaps in her history. Ash consists of his translation of the texts (in which he chose to use modern colloquialisms, so "she does say 'Fuck' rather a lot."), and the correspondence between him and his publishing editor. Both story-lines are quite interesting. Not only are there mysteries surrounding Ash's life, there are mysteries surrounding the publication of Pierce's book as well.

As part of her research for the novel, Mary Gentle studied at Kings College and received a masters degree in War Studies. So, the detail and historical accuracy is incredible despite it being a fantasy or alternate history of sorts; her understanding of the time-period is apparent. This is not a sanitized fantasy world, this is brutally realistic dirty, gruesome day-to-day living of a mercenary company in the 1470s.

Ash is quite an achievement; there is a ton of quality to go along with the quantity of writing. The story and characters are complex; I did find it somewhat confusing at times, and I'm still not sure I understood the ending completely, but I really enjoyed the book regardless. The total immersion into such a realistically written world and cast of characters was fantastic making this novel one that I'll keep thinking about for awhile.

Experiments in Reading show less

Very long, strange mixture of pseudo-historical and science fiction with an alternate history vibe. Read some years ago so don't recall much on the specifics, but it follows the career of a woman mercenary who rises to become captain of her own force (though exactly how she managed to do that was skipped over if I recall), having begun life as a camp brat who was brutally raped at the age of eight. But the twist is that a) the 15th century in which she lives and fights is not ours, as for a start Carthage didn't fall in this and there are still Visigoths threatening Europe and b) the story is meant to be a translation and is set in a framing device between the translator and publisher who email each other at intervals.

Furthermore, as show more the story progresses and more is translated and emailed to the publisher, the contemporary history begins to change and warp around the characters. There are other science fictional elements: part of Ash's success is because she hears a voice, only her voice isn't like those of Joan of Arc's as it gives her advice on military tactics and strategy. Eventually we learn that it is a 'Stone Golem' and that Ash is one of a number of children especially bred to be able to hear this telepathic communication and to carry out the Stone Golem's urgings. At one point, she meets a sister who is commander of an enemy force and is doing precisely that.

Along the way there is a lot of very in depth information on 15th century weapons, battles etc, with lots of swearing and also rather anachronistic dialogue though maybe we are meant to think that is the responsibility of the framing translator. There is also a great deal of violence to people and animals, including torture of Ash. I quite 'enjoyed' it overall but not in a must keep to re-read way. show less

Ms. Gentle's work is of high quality. This is definitely not by-the-yard trolls, dragons and Elves fantasy. It is a setting postulating that the Visigoths are still in possession of North Africa, and there is a very weird meteorological phenomenon dominating the south shore of the Mediterranean. But the changes all happened so long ago that there's very little artistic reason for any of this being on our earth. I guess it saved money on drawing a map of a made-up planet. So a curious failure in fantasy construction as far as I'm concerned.