Picture of author.

Daniel Guérin (1904–1988)

Author of Anarchism: From Theory to Practice

79+ Works 1,637 Members 9 Reviews 1 Favorited

About the Author

Series

Works by Daniel Guérin

Anarchism: From Theory to Practice (1965) 571 copies, 4 reviews
Fascism and Big Business (1973) 156 copies, 1 review
For a Libertarian Communism (1979) 48 copies, 1 review
Anarchism and Marxism (1981) 12 copies
The West Indies and their future (1961) 7 copies, 1 review
Bakunin 1 copy
La testa vuota (1994) 1 copy
L'Armée en France (1974) 1 copy
Le Pouvoir noir (1968) 1 copy

Associated Works

The Writings Of A Savage (1974) — Editor — 121 copies, 2 reviews
Disruptive Elements: The Extremes of French Anarchism (2014) — Contributor — 14 copies

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Canonical name
Guérin, Daniel
Legal name
Guérin, Daniel
Birthdate
1904-05-19
Date of death
1988-04-14
Gender
male
Occupations
writer
political activist
art critic
historian
Relationships
Halévy, David (uncle)
Guérin, Anne (daughter)
Nationality
France
Birthplace
Paris, France
Places of residence
Paris, France
Place of death
Suresnes, Hauts-de-Seine, Île-de-France, France
Associated Place (for map)
Paris, France

Members

Reviews

9 reviews
This is a book that is difficult for me to like because of its obtrusive political slant. Nevertheless it is a glimpse of the situation in Germany at an important historical juncture.

Daniel Guérin was a young revolutionary Socialist and French journalist when he set out on walking and bicycle tours into Germany, for a few months, just before and just after Hitler's appointment as Reich Chancellor in January 1933. So, Guérin was there when one of the greatest news stories of the century show more was taking place. His observations, recorded contemporaneously in his journals, and published back in France in left-wing newspapers and magazines, form the substance of this book.

He and a friend started out walking in August 1932 and, after a lift from a trucker, arrived at the edge of the Black Forest "...overflowing with an optimism . . . that perhaps I would finally find myself at the heart of the action in this youthful, modern and dynamic Germany that I had admired unceasingly since my childhood. It was here that socialism would triumph, or nowhere. It was here that the world's best organized and most educated working class had taken form."

But alas! "From the bridge at Kiehl to our arrival in Saxony, a long journey traveled sometimes on foot, and sometimes by train, we had a dominant impression: the population had already shifted to the side of the Nazis. The epidemic was widespread, and it was ravaging city and countryside alike. In every village square a tall insolent pole visible from afar bore an enormous red standard - a screaming red - scored with the black swastika. On the walls of the town hall or the schools were notice boards to which the pages of the National Socialist Daily were affixed. On tables of the beer halls, set in luxurious bindings, lay the party magazines."

In similar post-card-like descriptions he records the scenes he came across and the people he met and interviewed: from his first night at a youth hostel where the Socialist, Communist and Hitlerite youths slept in groups apart from each other and, at lights out, shouted their respective slogans - "Freiheit", "Rotfront!" and "Heil Hitler!"; through to an open air-meeting of tens of thousands of massed Brownshirts; to a book burning that stabs him to the heart, because it is Socialist literature being burnt; to bookstores with their shelves cleared of all books; to a famous meeting of the Reichstag mentioned in standard histories of the period; to a brave man who related his kidnapping and torture at the hands of the Brownshirts, despite an oath never to tell anyone of the 500 times he was repeatedly forced to stand up and then lie flat down on his face and stand up again; and other men who returned to their homes and wives after being kidnapped, who were emotionally broken and completely unable to speak of what they had endured.

As a journalist he wangled a pass to attend the meeting of the Reichstag, on September 12, 1932, "which it was rumored could well be historic." It was, and he was there. He notices the attendance of the Social Democrats, the Communists, the men of the Zentrum, the Conservative Party, and "the turbulent mass of 230 Hitlerites."
"In the Speaker's chair, a high Gothic throne, appeared a kind of large beardless doll with a disturbing jaw -- half executioner, half clown. Wearing a chestnut sport jacket with a floppy collar, elegant and impertinent, he seemed to be enjoying himself prodigiously. But when he opened his mouth the voice that emerged was as vicious as that of the giant I had seen in Potsdam. Glints of ferocity passed through the vacant eyes of this morphine addict. Speaker Hermann Goering gave the floor to the Communist deputy Torgler. With a few brief, skillful and violent words the Stalinist opened the attack against the government. . . .

"Goering, after a brief recess, announced in a cutting tone that the Communist's resolution of no-confidence would be put to a vote. Chancellor Von Papen rose, pretentious, disagreeable and very pale. With a barely visible gesture he demanded the floor. But the horrible doll in the Speaker's chair turned his head elsewhere and pretended not to see him. The second time Papen raised his finger in a determined manner. In vain. Such a sacrilege had never before been seen in a German parliament. Trembling with contained rage the Chancellor then pulled out a pink portfolio from under his arm. Walking quickly to the Speaker's desk, he handed Goering a small piece of paper and then left the chamber followed by his Barons in single file."

"The doll caught the paper in flight, tossed it disdainfully to the other side of the desk, and announced that the vote on the Communist's resolution would continue. . . ."

"Suddenly a tiny awkward monkey leaped forward from his bench. In two strides he reached the Gothic throne and with volubility and forceful gestures admonished the drug fiend. Duly lectured by Dr. Goebels, Goering then proclaimed that the government had been defeated, and that as a consequence the decree dissolving the Reichstag that Papen had taken out of his pink portfolio was null and void." In an hour, an accommodation was reached, Goring backed down and the Reichstag was indeed dissolved.

But in that scene we see, first, Guérin's typically derogatory and sneering attitude toward any who do not share his rigid view of class warfare and revolutionary Socialism; and we also see a lack of any description of the significance of what had just transpired before his very eyes. It was not farce he was looking at, it was history; and the political maneuverings of Hitler and his lieutenants were not so lightly to be mocked and dismissed. That scene was but one of Hitler's power plays as he jostled and elbowed his way toward the Chancellorship; it showed his strength and his willingness to use crude methods; and his ability to humiliate the government; and it was a historically portentous harbinger of things to come. Instead, Guérin gives us uncomprehending farce.

Elsewhere, he cannot forgo disdain when he describes the massed Brownshirt demonstration and the arrival of the big chiefs, "ridiculously strapped up, their fat asses compressed into their tight shorts"; or when he describes a well to do " Israelite family . . . lamenting and bewailing the unimaginable circumstances that have rent its gentle quietude, its honorable existence, its assured revenues," wishing to know what they would have to do if only the regime would leave them alone; or when he notes gaggles of enthusiastic young children and comments on these "Brunhilda's" and "Siegfrieds"; or when he finds himself in a massed demonstration by Von Papen's supporters (gentry of the ancien regime, squires, generals, industrialists, barons) and is "a bit to close for comfort to these green men. . . . Squashed between their rotundities. their shoulder straps, their Iron Crosses . . . obese, stupid, and crass reactionaries. . ."

On the big question, "Why did people do it? Why did people follow Hitler so enthusiastically?" he provides this answer:
"And above all, weariness took its toll. There was no sign of economic recovery. Would one ever find work again? The political parties had promised so much. So many posters had been read, so many leaflets had been skimmed. There had been so many electoral campaigns, so many ballots cast in vain. It was always the same old story. Even worse today than yesterday. The last liberties were being done away with, the worker's newspapers prohibited. I saw with my own eyes insolent Schupos cut off speakers who displeased them."

"And from the most disoriented workers I heard this monologue, the death knell of democratic Germany: Ah but if only leaders would work together. But this is a remote and unlikely possibility. So why shouldn't I listen to these new young saviors who promise bread and jobs, to free me from the Treaty of Versailles, and who swear they are a revolutionary socialist workers party, too? Heil Hitler!"

Guérin begins his book by describing his experiences among "the adversary, the victors of the hour. Then we shall search out our friends of the other Germany -- small groups of staunch militants who have put their fratricidal quarrels of the past behind them and who continue the struggle under the conditions of illegality and terror." Thus does he myopically dichotomize the entire population of Germany, those few who share revolutionary class-warfare goals with him, against all others as the adversary, victimizers and victims alike. He closes, in May 1933, by speaking with daring individuals who print illegal propaganda; who slip copies of the Communist sheet Rote Fahne into the pages of the Nazi newspaper Voelkischer Beobachter; who set movable rubber type into slots in a wood block to print miniature leaflets and then stick them to storefronts. And he has confidence that this other Germany, his Germany of the clandestine Socialist resistance, will prevail and bring Hitler down.

No one had grim imagination enough to foresee the years of horror and destruction to come, not Daniel Guérin, no one.

Ironically, one of his purposes in writing for his French audience was to "strip away the triumphalist prose of Nazism and reveal the bloodied body of the worker, the Jew, the 'marginal' beneath." However, back in France, before his second journey, he was "stupefied to discover that my eyewitness account was met with incredulity, even within the Socialist party. The late Oreste Rosenfeld, then editor-in-chief of le Populaire, has since admitted to me that he received many letters of protest from readers, some of which were quite vehement. Surely I was exaggerating! Surely my mind had already been made up! The French still had a lot to learn."

Nobody could imagine what was to come!
show less
really really amazing book, broke down anarchist philosophy, history, tactics, and goals in a way i'd never seen.
A simple and straightforward introduction to anarchism and its history through its most outstanding regional examples. This work makes heavy use of quotations, which at times can be a bit distracting and seem jumbled, but does offer more depth. An accessible entry level book on a diverse and complex topic, I would recommend it to a reader with budding interest in anarchism.
The French anarchist discusses a number of Caribbean countries in the late 1950s. This is a thoughtful essay focused mainly, but not entirely, on Martinique and Guadeloupe. Guérin also looks at Jamaica, Trinidad, Haiti, and Puerto Rico. It's important for its examination of the late colonial Caribbean just at the point of independence.

Lists

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
79
Also by
2
Members
1,637
Popularity
#15,691
Rating
3.9
Reviews
9
ISBNs
83
Languages
10
Favorited
1

Charts & Graphs