Picture of author.

Isabel de Madariaga (1919–2014)

Author of Ivan the Terrible

7+ Works 494 Members 11 Reviews

About the Author

Isabel de Madariaga is professor emeritus of Slavonic Studies at the University of London. Isabel Margaret de Madariaga was born in Glasgow, Scotland on August 27, 1919. As a result of her father's career as a Spanish diplomat, she was educated in France and Switzerland, and then in Britain, where show more the family settled in 1936. She received first-class honours from the School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES), where she was its first female undergraduate. During World War II, she monitored enemy broadcasts. She completed a Ph.D. on Anglo-Russian relations during the American War of Independence (1775-83), which was published in 1962 as Britain, Russia and the Armed Neutrality of 1780. She taught at several universities including Sussex, Lancaster, and the SSEES. As a Russian historian, she wrote several books including Russia in the Age of Catherine the Great, Catherine the Great, and Ivan the Terrible. She was made a fellow of the British Academy in 1990 and the Royal Spanish Academy of History in 1991. She died on June 16, 2014 at the age of 94. (Bowker Author Biography) show less
Image credit: Isabel de Madariaga

Works by Isabel de Madariaga

Associated Works

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Canonical name
Madariaga, Isabel de
Legal name
De Madariaga, Isabel Margaret
Birthdate
1919-08-27
Date of death
2014-06-16
Gender
female
Education
School of Slavonic and East European Studies, London (Russian) (1940)
University of Oxford (1959)
Occupations
Professor of Russian Studies
historian
biographer
military intelligence analyst
Organizations
London University (School of Slavonic and East European Studies)
Sussex University
Lancaster University
Awards and honors
British Academy (fellow|1990)
Royal Spanish Academy of History (fellow|1991)
Relationships
Madariaga, Salvador de (father)
Madariaga, Constance H. M. de (mother)
Mathews, Nieves (sister)
Short biography
Isabel de Madariaga was born in Glasgow to Salvador de Madariaga, a Spanish diplomat, politician, and writer, and his Scottish wife Constance Archibald. As the daughter of a diplomat, she met many prominent figures of the 1920s and 1930s, including Maurice Ravel. She was educated in France and Switzerland, learning various languages, and then in Great Britain, where the family settled in 1936 after the outbreak of the Spanish civil war. She became the first female undergraduate at the School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES) at the University of London, where she majored in Russian. After graduating with first-class honors in 1940, she helped monitor enemy broadcasts during World War II. In 1943, she married Leonard Schapiro, a lawyer and colleague in the monitoring services. In 1959, she completed a PhD degree on Anglo-Russian relations during the American War of Independence, with a dissertation later published as Britain, Russia and the Armed Neutrality of 1780 (1962). During her career, she became the most distinguished British historian of 18th-century Russia and helped transform the study of the subject as the author of classic works such as Russia in the Age of Catherine the Great (1981). She taught at the universities of Sussex and Lancaster before returning to the SSEES, where she became a professor of Russian Studies in 1982. She was named a fellow of the British Academy in 1990 and the Royal Spanish Academy of History in 1991.
Nationality
UK
Birthplace
Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Places of residence
London, England, UK
Associated Place (for map)
UK

Members

Reviews

13 reviews
Not to be confused with Peter the Great, Catherine the Great, or Boris Good Enough. From the “regional history” wish list. Naturally, I had heard the name, but didn’t know much about him. At the same time England was enjoying the Renaissance and the Elizabethan Age (Ivan was born in 1530 and died in 1584), Russia was ruled by a guy who actually makes Stalin look reasonable. He set people’s heads on fire, impaled them, boiled them alive, burned them at the stake, dismembered them, and show more when feeling merciful, merely cut off their ears, noses, and lips. One of his most interesting accomplishments was the creation of the oprichnina, which essentially set up a State within a State in Russia, and which allowed people in one State to freely plunder the other. He married seven times, often to the winner of a sort of “Miss Russia” contest, and at one point considered marriage to Queen Elizabeth. (Now there’s an alternate history topic for you). He destroyed the ancient cities of Pskov and Novgorod, and pauperized Russia with a series of fruitless wars against Sweden, Poland-Lithuania, and the Livonian Knights. (It’s interesting that he found admiration of a sort from Soviet-era historians, who decided all this destruction was a historical necessity).


The author of this biography, Isabel de Madariaga, is a little handicapped by the paucity of contemporary documentation. A lot of information about Ivan comes from foreign sources; the records of the English Muscovy Company and various comments from Poland, Lithuania, the Empire, and other neighbors. Since most of these were hostile to Russia, there’s some suspicion of exaggeration; but there’s enough from internal sources to back up most of the allegations. I found the book well-written; the major problem is the large number of Russian terms used. Although there’s a glossary, it’s short and not easy to reference. I realize that a boyar is not quite the same as a “noble”, and strel’tsy are not quite e the same as “musketeers”, but if you are going to have your glossary translate stol’nik as “steward (for example), why not just use “steward” in the text? This is a minor quibble, though; I’d suggest copying the one-page glossary and keeping it handy while you read. Four stars.
show less
½
How to tell the history of a difficult man when the sources you have are fragmentary at best? To a large degree the author does so by way of examining the extant diplomatic correspondence, and then interpolating from there. Considering that Ivan's focus was on foreign affairs, and most everything else was subordinated to the considerations of recreating Greater Rus, this often works out well. When De Madariaga descends into the morass that was the Polish royal succession after the demise of show more the Jagiellon dynasty the eyes can certainly glaze over. This is definitely history for historians.

Besides that the author has little patience with efforts to try and assign some meaning to Ivan's acts in terms of adding to the greater Russian state or as a way station on the way to a higher level of civilization. While it's arguable that many of Ivan's atrocities were not especially notable in an era riddled with atrocities, what seems to be the case is that Ivan's conception of himself was more a throwback to medieval thinking about an hereditary sovereign being the anointed of God (a concept adopted in the course of Muscovy declaring itself the "Third Rome"), which Ivan's own upbringing inculcated in him, but there was no one capable of inculcating the discipline that would discourage an unstable personality from taking that understanding to its logical conclusion and creating a tyranny that was totalitarian in its scope. Upon finishing De Madariaga's depiction of the course of the Oprichnina (Ivan's state within a state) the comparable case that comes to mind is that of the Pol Pot regime in Cambodia. The metaphor that De Madariaga chooses to end her narrative on is that of Lucifer; star of the morning on the way to becoming prince of hell.
show less
½
I always like multiple sources, so when I found another biography of Catherine the Great in a used bookstore I snapped it up – especially when it was by Isabel de Madariaga, whose biography of Ivan the Terrible I reviewed earlier. This turns out to be quite different from the Virginia Rounding biography which was my first Catherine book; in fact it’s not really a biography at all but more of a history of Catherine’s time. There isn’t anything about Catherine’s life before becoming show more Empress; we start right out with her seizure of power in 1762. After that, the narrative switches between history and the social situation. I was impressed by the amount of effort Catherine put out; she worked hard writing laws, setting up policies, etc. Economics for the average Russian improved considerably during her reign; the infamous “Potemkin villages” attributed to her lover Grigory Potemkin seem to have been largely a Soviet-era myth. The complexity of Russian administration, with separate systems for Nobility, “townsmen”, and serfs, remained but some things did get straightened out. Newspapers thrived, although there was some censorship; unfortunately Catherine was greatly disturbed by the French revolution and cracked down somewhat.


Overall a quite readable and interesting history and goes very well with the Virginia Rounding book mentioned above. I was a little critical of de Madariaga’s book on Ivan the Terrible because of her unnecessary use of Russian terms; there’s very little of that here.
show less
½
This is not a biography as one might expect at first glance, but a potted history of Catherine’s reign as Empress. The focus here is on her reforms and policies, and how Russia rose to be a great power in the 18th century as a consequence. The book is aimed at a general audience in the UK/US, has no footnotes and elegantly avoids confusing readers with the first name+patronymic system of Russian names by mostly using initials. The author often refers to Britain and France, thus putting a show more new and informative light on the overall history of the continent in the run-up to the French Revolution. show less

Lists

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
7
Also by
2
Members
494
Popularity
#50,037
Rating
3.2
Reviews
11
ISBNs
30
Languages
7

Charts & Graphs