Edward Marriott

This was an interesting, informative and chilling read. Plague. The word sends chills down my spine. No other word in the English language has the same ability to inspire fear as this one - not even words like war, torture, murder, holocaust, can inspire the same sense of dread as that one word. Plague.

Yet how many of us truly know the history of this disease? Sure, we've all heard of the famous 'Black Plague' outbreak that wiped out something like a third of Europe, but what of it's more show more recent history? Did you know, for example, that there had been outbreaks in America? Or that there is not a single continent on Earth not affected by plague (except, perhaps Antarctica)? Or that there had been a plague outbreak (in Surat, India) as recently as 1994?

I, for one, learned a lot from this well-written history of the search for this elusive creature - plague. Both informative and enjoyable to read, this book takes us through the history of this disease and the bitter rivalry that led, eventually, to the discovery of both cause and carrier. I highly recommend this to anyone with an interest in science, medicine or history, or simply with a taste for the macabre. show less

Plague. There is a lot of books on the stuff. In fact, trying to link to this book on the forums using touchstones is quite difficult, considering the countless other books with the same name. Many of the books use plague as a blanket term to describe a disease in general, however. This, of course, is a testament to how deeply-rooted our fear of plague has become, that its name can be used to describe any disease that causes widespread destruction. It has wreaked a lot of havoc in the past, show more and the mere mention of its name has come to signify terror.

Edward Marriott's Plague focuses on two outbreaks a century apart, 1894 Hong Kong and 1994 Surat. I found this going back and forth a bit confusing as I sometimes didn't realize which time period I was reading from, but then I realized how scary that was, that I couldn't tell the difference between a plague outbreak in the 1800's and one from less than 20 years ago.

The book also focuses on the rivalry between Alexandre Yersin and Shibasaburo Kitasato. Both were in Hong Kong in 1894 trying to solve the same riddle of plague, but both had entirely different experiences. Kitasato was the local hero, who had anything he wanted and the support of the public. Yersin on the other hand, was rejected, restricted, and forced to work in a straw hut in horrible conditions. Not that it mattered, there is a reason plague is known as Yersinia Pestis today.

Plague is a perfectly decent book. It's a little all over the place and I sometimes felt the author couldn't decide where he wanted to go with his book, and in the end I felt like there was a little something missing. It left me with that vague, slightly-unsatisfied feeling. I can't find a whole lot to complain about but I find a good reason to praise it either. It's just okay. show less

Nicaragua does not appear to have entered the late twentieth century intact, especially the Atlantic coast or the interior.
I am pretty sure if I was to ever go there the only water I would enter would be a swimming pool or shower. Between the sharks in the ocean, rivers, and lakes, the piranhas, and the alligators it sounds a little to much wild kingdom for me. The author had some major guts to travel the way he does in a country as dysfunctional as Nicaragua. This was a very entertaining book.

Edward Marriott does an excellent job describing the people, land, & culture of Nicaragua. His descriptive writing style would be just as suitable as a guide book, as it is a biography of his own adventures.
No doubt his attempt at finding one of the "monster sharks" futile & disappointing, but hopefully he found as much satisfaction with his writing as his readers do.