John Quiggin

Only read this book if you are prepared to be grumpy. I've been wondering for the past 2-3 years why politicians have been arguing back and forth about the bailout, healthcare, the budget, etc. without really having any intelligent or substantial feedback from economists. I figured they were just ignoring the economists because they were dumb politicians. Actually, the truth is that there are hardly any macroeconomists who have had anything useful to say about the recession.

Quiggin does a show more very good job of explaining how macroeconomics went so wrong over the past forty years and demonstrating that mainstream ideas about market efficiency have very little relationship to reality. Despite lots of technical details, the book is fairly accessible to those of us who know embarrassingly little about economics and is a short, engaging read.

I am not enough of an expert on economics or politics to be able to properly argue against any dumb conservative objections to Quiggin's argument, but honestly all of the rebuttals I could imagine would have to start with the assumption that our current economic crisis, and the gross inequality that preceded it, is somehow better than the alternative. Yeah, sorry, I'm not buying it. show less

A great concept, an even better title but rather meh results. In five chapters, Quiggin introduces, discusses and assesses the concepts of the Great Moderation/Goldilocks, the efficient market hypothesis, the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium model, trickle-down economics and privatization. In this selection, the big missing elephant is deregulation. While some of these ideas might have played a role in the economic meltdown, the dereliction of duty of the regulators and the corruption show more of the rating agencies and risk managers was its prime cause. If Standards & Poor and Moody's had done their job, they would never have granted the AAAs. If the lawyers had done their job, they would never allow MBS trusts without a full complement of mortgages to be sold. If risk managers had done their duty, they would have required sufficient capital to be set aside to cover the exposure. If the regulators had done their job, they would have reined in speculation and increased margins. The world witnessed a complete breakdown of professionalism. Vicomte de Valmont's "It's beyond my control" when it clearly wasn't. Bad ideas played the least part.

Similar to the moral breakdown of the Catholic Church prior to the reformation in the 14th and 15th century, the failure lay not primarily in a misunderstanding of doctrine but a breakdown of professional practice. The clergy simply no longer cared to do their job and nobody held them accountable. It took a long long time until the peasant's complaints were heard. Actually, only when the cities became involved, did matters change. Given that today, the main centers of wealth are also the centers of corruption, we are in for the long haul.

The track record of the Christian belief in corporal resurrection, the original Zombies, exemplifies the longevity of strange ideas. Ideas, being immaterial, can not be killed. It takes great effort to change even the most strange beliefs (cf. creationism). In economics, bad ideas have taken over whole universities. Quiggin offers no plan how to neutralize the bad ideas machine that is the University of Chicago. It is unlikely that we will witness an internal collapse as happened to most Marxist economics. Quiggin's approach in discussing the successes and failures of his five selected concepts is of little help in convincing Zombies to change their behavior. show less

The author had a great idea for this book but it doesn't quite live up to my expectations. It is a good, simplified, history of the ups and downs (and returns to life) of various flavours of economics over the last century but doesn't do a good job of addressed the structural and cultural forces that play such a strong role in the curious revivification of ideas that by all logic should have long since withered. Indeed, it is a strangely apolitical book given the way in which economics and show more politics are two sides of the same coin. show less

Interesting read that helps me to contextualize and reimagine many of my positions and understandings on economic issues. The format is useful and rather cute too, separating the different ideas into chapters and as different kinds of zombies.