Hugh Raffles
Author of Insectopedia
About the Author
Image credit: By Larry D. Moore, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=17331812
Works by Hugh Raffles
The Illustrated Insectopedia 4 copies
Associated Works
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Gender
- male
- Occupations
- professor
anthropologist - Organizations
- The New School
- Nationality
- UK
- Places of residence
- New York, New York, USA
- Associated Place (for map)
- New York, New York, USA
Members
Reviews
Thanks to NetGalley for my ARC.
This book opens up like no other anthropology book you will ever read and its because its not a straightforward anthropology 'all about rocks' kind of a book although it is written by an accomplished anthropologist. Hugh Raffles opens his The Book of Unconformities with the tragic story of the uncannily timed death of his two sisters, one dies during pregnancy and the other in suicide. After the opening there is no direct stated trace back to this heartbreaking show more entrance into his subject matter. However throughout the read the death of Raffles sisters, at least to this reader, hung over my head, loomed in the background and I kept making my own connections to this tragic event and the things that Raffles writes about throughout this wonderfully written book. Try to keep the introduction as you read this book. Try to hearken back to the tragedy that served as the reason Raffles spent 10 years researching this endlessly interesting topic. Thinking on this will help to make sense and have a connection to the details and insights that Raffles makes throughout.
It is a stunning work and a wholly original deep dive into the objects that we, mankind/humanity, imbue with meaning and stories and mythology and what it means when those meanings break down and change and get interpreted and reinterpreted. In that way it's heartbreaking, this research topic that found its genesis in tragic loss that is all about all sorts of losses over the entire history of mankind. While time is indifferent it seems to all of our fates or the fates of things or the fates of the things that we give meaning to and the fates of those meanings themselves what is not indifferent, at least it is evident to this reader, is our ability to then trace over those things that are losing meaning that seem dead or lost and to then find comfort and meaning in them. It is then the ability or potential to find kinship with deep time with the geologic timescale that Raffles seems to be pointing at. The fact that all of the histories that he traces back to and writes about is about humanity tapping into just one moment in the 'lifespan' of fragments of geology that will outlast us all by many aeons. It is this uncanny realization that our marks can upon the geologic will be there long after us - long after any of us and that the meanings are all temporary and subject to change and loss and reinvention.
Hugh Raffles writes the sort of quirky off-kilter and unexpected natural science books that I love to read. Highly original and based on good field work and full of information and insights that I would not be able to access myself. The Book of Unconformities pairs well with work like Adele Brands The Hidden World of the Fox and anything written by Helen MacDonald. This said it is obvious but it must be stated that Raffles is a totally engaging writer and his prose keeps you moving along even when the subject matter gets deep and it does get deep. The book is based on ten years of field work and travel and research it is all encompassing but its engaging in the way a really great class is engaging Raffles teaches and illuminates but it never feels like a chore.
The Book of Unconformities takes anthropology writing into the realm of literature and as the cover will tell you its a speculation(s) on lost time. show less
This book opens up like no other anthropology book you will ever read and its because its not a straightforward anthropology 'all about rocks' kind of a book although it is written by an accomplished anthropologist. Hugh Raffles opens his The Book of Unconformities with the tragic story of the uncannily timed death of his two sisters, one dies during pregnancy and the other in suicide. After the opening there is no direct stated trace back to this heartbreaking show more entrance into his subject matter. However throughout the read the death of Raffles sisters, at least to this reader, hung over my head, loomed in the background and I kept making my own connections to this tragic event and the things that Raffles writes about throughout this wonderfully written book. Try to keep the introduction as you read this book. Try to hearken back to the tragedy that served as the reason Raffles spent 10 years researching this endlessly interesting topic. Thinking on this will help to make sense and have a connection to the details and insights that Raffles makes throughout.
It is a stunning work and a wholly original deep dive into the objects that we, mankind/humanity, imbue with meaning and stories and mythology and what it means when those meanings break down and change and get interpreted and reinterpreted. In that way it's heartbreaking, this research topic that found its genesis in tragic loss that is all about all sorts of losses over the entire history of mankind. While time is indifferent it seems to all of our fates or the fates of things or the fates of the things that we give meaning to and the fates of those meanings themselves what is not indifferent, at least it is evident to this reader, is our ability to then trace over those things that are losing meaning that seem dead or lost and to then find comfort and meaning in them. It is then the ability or potential to find kinship with deep time with the geologic timescale that Raffles seems to be pointing at. The fact that all of the histories that he traces back to and writes about is about humanity tapping into just one moment in the 'lifespan' of fragments of geology that will outlast us all by many aeons. It is this uncanny realization that our marks can upon the geologic will be there long after us - long after any of us and that the meanings are all temporary and subject to change and loss and reinvention.
Hugh Raffles writes the sort of quirky off-kilter and unexpected natural science books that I love to read. Highly original and based on good field work and full of information and insights that I would not be able to access myself. The Book of Unconformities pairs well with work like Adele Brands The Hidden World of the Fox and anything written by Helen MacDonald. This said it is obvious but it must be stated that Raffles is a totally engaging writer and his prose keeps you moving along even when the subject matter gets deep and it does get deep. The book is based on ten years of field work and travel and research it is all encompassing but its engaging in the way a really great class is engaging Raffles teaches and illuminates but it never feels like a chore.
The Book of Unconformities takes anthropology writing into the realm of literature and as the cover will tell you its a speculation(s) on lost time. show less
Just as river waters ceaselessly make and unmake its geography, the Amazonian landscape has proven pliant for contradictory and shifting human narratives. From Sir Walter Raleigh's political need for an El Dorado to a modern group of rural Brazilians bickering about a generation-old power struggle, the Amazon is generously and physically plastic.
I really like the core idea of In Amazonia -- that understanding the region is impossible unless you understand the multitude of contradictory show more "texts" embraced simultaneously by past conquerors and current residents -- but I was somewhat thrown by the tone of the book. Three-fourths of the book is richly anecdotal and conversational, whether the author is laying out the lifelong disappointments of naturalist Henry Walter Bates or turning an anthropological eye on the self-conscious residents of an Amazonian tributary during the 1990s. But these accounts are unexpectedly laced with abstract, jangly terminology, as if the author randomly felt the need to prove his chops as a Real Historian.
Admittedly, the reader probably knows what lies ahead after seeing the Walter Benjamin quote on the third page, but I was constantly jarred by the tonal shifts in the book. Perhaps it reveals my own biases when I prefer the straight reportage over the interpretative theory, but I'd like to think that there's a middle ground between the spoon-feeding found in "popular" history and the impenetrable, inside-baseball jargon present in academic history. In Amazonia handles its subject so smoothly and naturally most of the time that it's doubly disappointing when it fumbles towards some strained buzz word.
(Also: The In Amazonia drinking game includes the words "materiality" and "oneiric.") show less
I really like the core idea of In Amazonia -- that understanding the region is impossible unless you understand the multitude of contradictory show more "texts" embraced simultaneously by past conquerors and current residents -- but I was somewhat thrown by the tone of the book. Three-fourths of the book is richly anecdotal and conversational, whether the author is laying out the lifelong disappointments of naturalist Henry Walter Bates or turning an anthropological eye on the self-conscious residents of an Amazonian tributary during the 1990s. But these accounts are unexpectedly laced with abstract, jangly terminology, as if the author randomly felt the need to prove his chops as a Real Historian.
Admittedly, the reader probably knows what lies ahead after seeing the Walter Benjamin quote on the third page, but I was constantly jarred by the tonal shifts in the book. Perhaps it reveals my own biases when I prefer the straight reportage over the interpretative theory, but I'd like to think that there's a middle ground between the spoon-feeding found in "popular" history and the impenetrable, inside-baseball jargon present in academic history. In Amazonia handles its subject so smoothly and naturally most of the time that it's doubly disappointing when it fumbles towards some strained buzz word.
(Also: The In Amazonia drinking game includes the words "materiality" and "oneiric.") show less
I was provided an advanced copy of this book by Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.
I hesitate to give a book that is part memoir about loss a low rating, because I know how much of the author is invested in the story - the time and emotional work invested in getting the piece to publication - and for that effort I have given it the rating it has.
However, the book's actual verbosity and complexity was too much when it was described as a story where the author would use geology through show more time as touchstones to help cope with the loss. Unless you have a deep interest in learning about geology and stone through time and around the world, you might want to pass on this one. show less
I hesitate to give a book that is part memoir about loss a low rating, because I know how much of the author is invested in the story - the time and emotional work invested in getting the piece to publication - and for that effort I have given it the rating it has.
However, the book's actual verbosity and complexity was too much when it was described as a story where the author would use geology through show more time as touchstones to help cope with the loss. Unless you have a deep interest in learning about geology and stone through time and around the world, you might want to pass on this one. show less
No real idea how to do this one justice; a beautiful book that refuses to draw disciplinary lines and presents some of the ugliest human behavior (vis-à-vis other sapiens and the rest of creation, organic and in-), somehow without causing the reader to lose faith. The very sort of book I hope one day to write.
Awards
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Statistics
- Works
- 5
- Also by
- 1
- Members
- 491
- Popularity
- #50,319
- Rating
- 3.5
- Reviews
- 6
- ISBNs
- 18
- Languages
- 3




















