Picture of author.

David Foster Wallace (1962–2008)

Author of Infinite Jest

89+ Works 47,613 Members 863 Reviews 344 Favorited

About the Author

Writer David Foster Wallace was born in Ithaca, New York on February 21, 1962. He received a B.A. from Amherst College in Massachusetts. He was working on his master's degree in creative writing at the University of Arizona when he published his debut novel The Broom of the System (1987). Wallace show more published his second novel Infinite Jest (1996) which introduced a cast of characters that included recovering alcoholics, foreign statesmen, residents of a halfway house, and high-school tennis stars. He spent four years researching and writing this novel. His first collection of short stories was Girl with Curious Hair (1989). He also published a nonfiction work titled Signifying Rappers: Rap and Race in the Urban Present. He committed suicide on September 12, 2008 at the age of 46 after suffering with bouts of depression for 20 years. (Bowker Author Biography) show less

Works by David Foster Wallace

Infinite Jest (1996) 14,993 copies, 269 reviews
Consider the Lobster and Other Essays (2005) 4,850 copies, 85 reviews
Brief Interviews with Hideous Men (1999) 3,906 copies, 57 reviews
The Broom of the System (1987) 3,240 copies, 66 reviews
The Pale King (2011) 3,037 copies, 67 reviews
Oblivion: Stories (2004) 2,757 copies, 39 reviews
Girl with Curious Hair: Stories (1988) 2,453 copies, 30 reviews
Both Flesh and Not: Essays (2012) 948 copies, 15 reviews
The Best American Essays 2007 (2007) — Editor — 497 copies, 11 reviews
The David Foster Wallace Reader (2013) 297 copies, 1 review
Signifying Rappers (1990) 268 copies, 7 reviews
String Theory: David Foster Wallace on Tennis (2016) 256 copies, 6 reviews
Something to Do with Paying Attention (2022) 128 copies, 2 reviews
The Last Interview and Other Conversations (2012) — Author — 124 copies, 8 reviews
Federer as Religious Experience (2010) 54 copies, 2 reviews
A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again: An Essay (2012) — Author — 48 copies, 1 review
On Tennis: Five Essays (2013) 38 copies, 1 review
Der Spaß an der Sache: Alle Essays (2018) 29 copies, 1 review
Big Red Son [essay] (2017) 23 copies
In His Own Words (2014) 15 copies, 1 review
The Soul Is Not a Smithy [short story] (2014) — Author — 15 copies, 2 reviews
Antologia de contes (2016) 14 copies, 1 review
Good Old Neon [short story] 10 copies, 1 review
Good People 4 copies, 1 review
Ici et là-bas (2014) 2 copies
Backbone 1 copy
Die wahre Traurigkeit der Erwachsenen (2018) — Author — 1 copy
Sonora Review 12 (Summer 1987) — Fiction Editor — 1 copy

Associated Works

Wittgenstein's Mistress (1988) — Afterword, some editions — 1,790 copies, 40 reviews
The New Kings of Nonfiction (2007) — Contributor — 794 copies, 24 reviews
The Best American Nonrequired Reading 2006 (2006) — Contributor — 779 copies, 10 reviews
Writer's Thesaurus (2004) — Contributor — 619 copies, 10 reviews
Birthday Stories (2002) — Contributor — 495 copies, 6 reviews
Jack (1989) — Blurber, some editions — 461 copies, 5 reviews
Flash Fiction: 72 Very Short Stories (1992) — Contributor — 438 copies, 10 reviews
The Best American Essays 2005 (2005) — Contributor — 359 copies, 3 reviews
Postmodern American Fiction: A Norton Anthology (1997) — Contributor — 301 copies, 1 review
The Anchor Book of New American Short Stories (2004) — Contributor — 289 copies, 9 reviews
The Best American Short Stories 1992 (1992) — Contributor — 244 copies, 3 reviews
Why I Write: Thoughts on the Craft of Fiction (1998) — Contributor — 197 copies, 4 reviews
The Best of McSweeney's {complete} (2013) — Contributor — 159 copies, 1 review
The O. Henry Prize Stories 2002 (2002) — Contributor — 151 copies, 2 reviews
An American Album: One Hundred and Fifty Years of Harper's Magazine (2000) — Contributor — 145 copies, 1 review
The Ecco Anthology of Contemporary American Short Fiction (2008) — Contributor — 140 copies, 2 reviews
Burned Children of America (2001) — Contributor — 130 copies, 2 reviews
Prize Stories 1999: The O. Henry Awards (1999) — Contributor — 108 copies, 1 review
Boston Noir 2: The Classics (2012) — Contributor — 74 copies, 4 reviews
McSweeney's 01: Gegenshein (1998) — Contributor — 71 copies, 1 review
After Yesterday's Crash: The Avant-Pop Anthology (1995) — Contributor — 71 copies
The Best American Magazine Writing 2001 (2001) — Contributor — 69 copies
The Best American Magazine Writing 2006 (2006) — Contributor — 65 copies, 1 review
Prize Stories 1989: The O. Henry Awards (1989) — Contributor — 55 copies
Bestial Noise: The Tin House Fiction Reader (2003) — Contributor — 50 copies
Love is Strange: Stories of Postmodern Romance (1993) — Contributor — 34 copies, 2 reviews
Sail Away: Stories of Escaping to Sea (2001) — Contributor — 28 copies
The Analog Sea Review: Number Two (2019) — Contributor — 22 copies, 1 review
Dot Dot Dot 18 (2009) — Contributor — 19 copies
Open City Number Five: Change or Die (1997) — Contributor — 17 copies
Conjunctions: 12 (1988) — Contributor — 13 copies
The Story About the Story Vol. II (2013) — Contributor — 12 copies
Conjunctions: 17, Tenth Anniversary Issue (1991) — Contributor — 7 copies
The Chaffey Review: Volume 1 (January 2009) — Contributor — 2 copies
Black Clock 1 (2004) — Contributor — 2 copies
The Mechanics' Institute Review: Issue 7 (2010) — Contributor — 2 copies
Thomas Demand: L'Esprit d'Escalier — Contributor — 1 copy
Love Stories: A Literary Companion to Tennis (2003) — Contributor — 1 copy
Clarion: Writing at Amherst 1985 — Contributor — 1 copy
Sonora Review 56 — Contributor — 1 copy
Sonora Review 13 (Fall 1987) — Contributor — 1 copy
The New Yorker, Dec. 14, 2009 — Contributor - Fiction — 1 copy
Mechanics' Institute Review: Issue 4 (2008) — Contributor — 1 copy

Tagged

20th century (182) addiction (160) American (421) American literature (499) contemporary (135) currently-reading (187) David Foster Wallace (240) DFW (197) ebook (253) essay (147) essays (1,554) fiction (3,048) goodreads (165) humor (408) Kindle (192) literature (519) math (275) non-fiction (1,299) novel (466) own (177) owned (168) philosophy (210) postmodern (310) postmodernism (197) read (349) short stories (805) tennis (219) to-read (3,959) unread (264) USA (216)

Common Knowledge

Members

Discussions

David Foster Wallace in Legacy Libraries (August 2015)
Into the heart of America, zenomax's IJ thread. in Infinite Jesters (January 2013)
anna reads IJ in Infinite Jesters (January 2013)
When Art and Infinite Jest Collide in Infinite Jesters (December 2012)
INFINITE JEST: Its Structure in Infinite Jesters (November 2012)
Requesting the help of some Infinite Jesters in Book talk (November 2010)
Infinite Jest? in 1001 Books to read before you die (November 2007)

Reviews

925 reviews
I am obsessed with Infinite Jest. If Infinite Jest were a bowling score (bingo!) it would be 300. Perfect! When the 10 year, $10 anniversary edition of IJ came out with the intro by David Eggers, I had to buy it even though the copy I possessed (I don't own Inifinite Jest or have a copy of Infinite Jest, I POSSESS Infinite Jest like a demon) was in great shape, good for another half dozen reads. Recently, I possessed a hardcover first edition of Infinite Jest, even though I had only read the show more 10 year, $10 anniversary edition of Infinite Jest with the intro by David Eggers twice. I saw IJ sitting in a pile on the floor in the fiction aisle of the Bookman in Orange, CA, where a gangly, geeky looking Gin Blossom t-shirt wearing no doubt writer-intellectual-type was about to grab it. That's right, the geek was about to snatch my first first edition of Infinite Jest away from me. "Get away from her!" I boomed, "the sow is mine!" And then my head spun round in sinister circles, and the geek (good riddance) fled for his life from the bookracks.

Infinite Jest was a revelatory, revolutionary reading experience for me. Think "the British are coming!" as I turned each page; think the Bolsheviks. What a liberating read, opening new wormholes in fiction. Once I'd read IJ, the landscape of contemporary literature was irrevocably transformed for me, and I could never be content again (or so I thought) with what I saw as constant mediocrity in serious fiction. However, here's the downside: Wallace raised for me in contemporary literature such an Everest expectation of any new work, that I couldn't help have the nagging, always anti-climactic sense when thereafter approaching other author's works (and Wallace's, unfortunately, too) that what I was reading was somehow "less than" or "could've been better" or "just wasn't rich enough". In other words, once I'd conquered Everest, Mounts Kilimanjaro or Fuji -- world class summits in their own rights with fantastic views-- didn't satisfy. How could they--I'd been to the HIGHEST summit too many times. But then I realized over time that most writers don't aspire for Everest with every creative effort and, more importantly, if they do not aim for Everest, they should not be read nor critiqued as if they were aiming for Everest. Maybe they were summitting Rainier or Pikes Peak. Maybe they were happy with hills (and their readers too). Could it not, in fact, be argued that creating interesting, readable "hills" might demonstrate a talent requiring more nuance, subtlety and skill than Wallace demonstrated in IJ? Nah, not really, Wallace is still the best. But hey, there's nothing innately wrong with literary hills in the first place. Wildflowers, after all, bloom brilliantly in the hills here in So. CA every spring, don't they?

True, wildflowers bloom, they do, but Wallace, premiere mountaineer, almost ruined me for fiction, I just can't shake his overarching influence and legacy. He put me, anonymous reader, on his genius back and lugged me to the top of Everest. And I just can't see the point in bowling again.
show less
I've been obsessed with DFW's writings for many years. I've masticated (don't misread that) my way through this book for as many years. Not a good sign. And it's not because it's too difficult or some such nonsense. Too many big words? Get thee behind me, bizarre creature. My nerd heart sings at each florid tumescence of my lexicon. No. The wonderfully titled Infinite Jest lacks what a successful novel needs. And that's the emotional live wire, the through-line that hooks you, invests you, show more compels you to turn pages. I don't care in the slightest about any of the puppets peopling this book. And that is a problem. They are mere vehicles, skeletal vignettes of a dystopia-near-you. (Don't get me started on the women and black folks herein... my man embarrasses me.) The characters never get to live, breathe, grow flesh, peel off the page and climb into my mind. I never feel invited into their experiences. (I swear it's not just because the experiences stink.)

This book is essentially a thought experiment. Of course if you're going to grab a front row seat to cerebral calisthenics, you'd do worse than watching as agile a mind as DFWs. This thing is packed with philosophically delectable turns of phrase amidst the parade of demonic mundanity. We're remonstrated that Prof. Wallace avoided making a proper, emotionally vital novel (so gauche) in order to convey the ultimate disorientation and dissolution of the zeitgeist. Or perhaps that of his own mind. You have the prototypical consumer zombie of our late-capitalist nightmare dancing eagerly under the tech-glamorized spell to avoid the widening chasm of nothingness inside as everything precious and vulnerable is laid to waste. So far so good. But I think an effective dystopia is alert to the cracks in the facade where the wildflowers grow. For as much as man wills it, we are not theory-spouting robots. There is the audible rattle of our instincts in their cages. The wages of fear and desire harbor seeds of change that are what makes it worthwhile to hang on. In life or in a novel.
show less
It's not often that I read a collection of essays. But I must say, I was immersed in this collection almost immediately. What caused this, was rather than preaching to me, piling on facts, trying to convince me his thoughts were correct, Wallace engaged me in a dialogue. There's no questioning his intelligence, and no doubt that Wallace sees things from a very different perspective. But time after time after making what seemed a valid point. He would ask a question. What about this ? How show more about that ? Could this be the case? Hours after I'd put this book down I'd find myself not just reflecting on the points Wallace made, but pondering upon the questions he asked. The more you think about a book the more it stays with you. This one will stay with me for a long time. show less
It is fair to say that my experience of ‘A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again’ was mixed. At times, I was genuinely amused or intellectually stimulated. At others, I asked myself why I put myself through so many non-fiction books when one of my ostensibly powerful motivations for reading is escapism. Specifically, I wondered why I was putting myself through a series of non-fiction flashbacks to [b:Infinite Jest|6759|Infinite Jest|David Foster show more Wallace|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1446876799s/6759.jpg|3271542], the majority of which I read during a deeply resentful five day stay in Milton Keynes. Somewhat metatextually, I passed a lot of time in Milton Keynes that should have been taken up with professional networking of some description instead writing an acerbically detailed account of my resentments. The final essay in this collection, indeed the one that gives the book its title, is very similar in tone to my chronicle of Milton Keynes. Not that I have anything like the writing skill of David Foster Wallace.* The reminder of Milton Keynes was unwelcome, however.

I freely admit that Foster Wallace is accomplished, albeit in a way that is not always easy to appreciate.** I wonder that his editors let him get away with turning in such unashamedly digressive and flamboyantly lengthy pieces.*** His neurotic inability to enjoy organised fun, a trait I most definitely share, makes his observations both compelling and uncomfortable to read. Another sticking point is my utter disinterest in tennis. There are at least fifty solid pages of tennis in this book and I struggled through them. I also find his observations of women unsettling in a manner that’s hard to precisely put my finger on. The tone of his commentary on people he meets differs very markedly by gender, which gives me an itch between the shoulder blades. This notwithstanding, the second essay contains some astute and thought-provoking observations upon the role of TV in saturating US culture with irony, a trend he sees as corrosive. First published in 1990, the piece contains flashes of prescience and remains relevant today:

So then how have irony, irreverence, and rebellion come to be not liberating but enfeebling in the culture today’s avant-garde tries to write about? One clue’s to be found in the fact that irony is still around, bigger than ever after 30 long years as the dominant mode of hip expression. It’s not a rhetorical mode that wears well. As Hyde (who I pretty obviously like) puts it, “Irony only has emergency use. Carried over time, it is the voice of the trapped who have come to enjoy their cage.” This is because irony, entertaining as it is, serves an almost exclusively negative function. It’s critical and destructive, a ground-clearing. Surely this is way our postmodern fathers saw it. But irony’s singularly unuseful when it comes to constructing anything to replace the hypocrisies it debunks.


My advice on approaching ‘A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again’ is as follows. Unless you have an intense obsession with tennis, avoid the first and sixth essays. The former was a poor choice of opener, as I began the book thinking, “Christ, not this tennis shit again.” The second is the most thought-provoking, and thus recommended. The third and seventh form the entertainment portion and have the same format: Foster Wallace observes fellow humans partaking of organised fun. Both great. The fourth is actually a disorientatingly brief book review, which if nothing else proves that he was capable of writing succinctly yet chose not to. The remaining essay, the fifth, considers David Lynch’s filmography for more than sixty pages. If this interests you, D.F.W’s perspective appears densely well-informed and thoroughly argued. If it does not, the level of detail rapidly becomes wearisome. In short, I enjoyed perhaps half of the book’s total pages very much, while the other half alternately treated me to unpleasant deja vu and boredom. Distinctive and interesting a writer as Foster Wallace can be, I do not feel compelled to delve any further into his bibliography.****


* Although I do at least know better than to start sentences with ‘And but the’, which he apparently does in both fiction and non.
** I’ve earned the right to include unnecessary footnotes in this review by suffering through D.F.W’s interminable footnotery. The one mercy is that, unlike the edition of [b:Infinite Jest|6759|Infinite Jest|David Foster Wallace|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1446876799s/6759.jpg|3271542] I read, these essays are formatted with footnotes actually at the foot of each page rather than being collected in an ominous vastness at the end of the book.
*** He likely would have struggled in this febrile era of the tweet-length Hot Take. Although there remains a specific niche for so-called ‘longreads’, fifty pages is closer to a dissertation.
**** Apart from anything else, I noticed during the Milton Keynes episode and was subsequently reminded today that reading Foster Wallace induces in me a certain waspish attitude to life that I don't particularly like.
show less

Lists

. (1)
1980s (1)
scav (1)
1990s (2)
. (1)
98 (1)
Cooper (1)
. (1)

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Sean Pratt Narrator
James Ryerson Introduction
jay garfield Epilogue
Dave Eggers Foreword, Author
Michael Pietsch Editor, Introduction
Jo Ann Beard Contributor, Afterword
Daniel Orozco Contributor
Garret Keizer Contributor
Malcolm Gladwell Contributor
Marilynne Robinson Contributor
Edward O. Wilson Contributor
Louis Menand Contributor
Cynthia Ozick Contributor
Roger Scruton Contributor
Peter A. Singer Contributor
Ian Buruma Contributor
Elaine Scarry Contributor
W. S. Di Piero Contributor
Marione Ingram Contributor
Richard Rodriguez Contributor
John Lahr Contributor
Mark Greif Contributor
George Gessert Contributor
Phillip Robertson Contributor
Jerald Walker Contributor
Molly Peacock Contributor
Mark Danner Contributor
Karen Green Introduction
Bonnie Nadell Introduction
Bradford Morrow Contributor
Tom Scocca Author
LW Montgomery Illustrator
Sven Birkerts Contributor, Afterword
Gerald Howard Contributor, Afterword
Rikki Ducornet Contributor
Janice Galloway Contributor
Curtis White Contributor
Jonathan Franzen Contributor
Ilan Stavans Contributor
Peter Dimock Contributor
Steve Tomasula Contributor
Carole Maso Contributor
Mary Caponegro Contributor
Martina Testa Translator
Javier Calvo Translator
Marcelo Covián Translator
Marion Ettlinger Author photograph
strommejan Cover artist
Keith Hayes Cover designer
Grazia Giua Contributor
Tero Valkonen Translator
Annalisa Villoresi Contributor
Jon Gray Cover designer
Steve Snider Cover designer
Edoardo Nesi Translator
Marcus Ingendaay Translator
Zadie Smith Foreword
Ben Shenkman Narrator
Iannis Goerlandt Translator
Vincenzo Ostuni Translator
Joey Slotnick Narrator
Will Forte Narrator
John III Fulbrook Cover designer
Josh Charles Narrator
Karen Beard Cover photo
Corey Stoll Narrator
Joshua Ferris Narrator
Paul Buckley Cover designer
Eric Nyquist Cover artist
Mario J. Pulice Cover designer
Neal Stephenson Introduction
Nick Maniatis Afterword
Kristine Hvam Narrator
Anne Fadiman Afterword
Nam Le Afterword
Hari Kunzru Afterword
David L. Ulin Afterword
Mark Costello Afterword
NANDO CRUZ Foreword
Christian Raimo Translator
Chrigel Farner Illustrator
Dave Eggers Foreword
Lars Eidinger Narrator

Statistics

Works
89
Also by
48
Members
47,613
Popularity
#332
Rating
4.0
Reviews
863
ISBNs
490
Languages
22
Favorited
344

Charts & Graphs