This topic is currently marked as "dormant"—the last message is more than 90 days old. You can revive it by posting a reply.
1justjim
With the introduction of another view into Talk, namely 'Started by you', I'd like to see a discussion about possible re-ordering of these links on the left hand sub-nav.
My personal preference would be:
Your groups
Your starred
Favourite messages
Started by you
(more)
Your books
Your posts
Ignored
The thinking behind the ones above the (more) are that they are views that I have had a say in. I joined those groups, I starred those threads, I marked those posts as favourites and I started those threads.
Below the (more), I've put the ones that I don't use. Naturally YMMV.
Discuss, using both sides of the paper.
My personal preference would be:
Your groups
Your starred
Favourite messages
Started by you
(more)
Your books
Your posts
Ignored
The thinking behind the ones above the (more) are that they are views that I have had a say in. I joined those groups, I starred those threads, I marked those posts as favourites and I started those threads.
Below the (more), I've put the ones that I don't use. Naturally YMMV.
Discuss, using both sides of the paper.
2timspalding
Following threads you started, but not ones you contribute to is not a universalizable!
T
T
3justjim
You made that word up, didn't you?
I use Your groups and Your starred to follow threads that I'm active in.
I use Favourite messages as reference material, usually to great HTML hints. I seem to have a very specific case of CRAFT when it comes to HTML.
I will use Started by you, now that we have it, probably for research. Usage may develop further with time.
I use Your groups and Your starred to follow threads that I'm active in.
I use Favourite messages as reference material, usually to great HTML hints. I seem to have a very specific case of CRAFT when it comes to HTML.
I will use Started by you, now that we have it, probably for research. Usage may develop further with time.
4brightcopy
If I didn't know the customization feature of the works page was one of your least favorite bits of code, I'd suggest making the order customizable rather than one-size-sorta-fits-all.
But I wouldn't suggest that.
Nope.
But I wouldn't suggest that.
Nope.
5MarthaJeanne
I agree that it would be wonderful to have 'your groups' and 'your starred' at the top.
Adding 'Started by you' is great, but putting it in the middle has made it harder to find the links I am used to going to.
Adding 'Started by you' is great, but putting it in the middle has made it harder to find the links I am used to going to.
6divinenanny
Just wanted to mention that 'Your Posts' is my most used tab. I used to star the threads I started, so I am happy with the new tab. I only use the Your Groups and Hot Topics when I am bored...
7mckait
I am very grateful to have new ways to enter talk.. and I appreciate the effort it took to give them to us. I spend no time at all finding the one that suits me at the moment, and am quite happy to have them in any order that I find them. Thank you so much!
8infiniteletters
I definitely want to keep Your Posts shown, not under More.
9foggidawn
Like divinenanny, "Your posts" is the view I use most often. While I love the new "Started by you" option, I don't see it changing that fact.
10lilithcat
I think the current sort is logical. It goes from the larger world to the smaller. I'd leave it. (I certainly wouldn't want "your starred" at the top, as I have yet to star a thread, other than accidentally!)
12paradoxosalpha
I just like the title of this thread.
13MerryMary
The list is short and available on one screen without scrolling. What earthly difference does it make what order it's in? Just click on what you want, wherever it is.
15auntSteelbreaker
@13 This is a site for cataloging so a lot of people here find order and structure very important.
18JonathanGorman
There was a suggestion a while ago to have some sort of link that combined "Your Groups, Your Starred, and Your Posts" into just one link. (This was before the "You Started" or whatever it is.)
I'd have to say I'd much prefer to have that link exist and have it be the top one.
Then I guess I probably use your groups/posts/starred about equal. Your books is pretty much useless and could be relegated to the bottom of the heap.
I'd have to say I'd much prefer to have that link exist and have it be the top one.
Then I guess I probably use your groups/posts/starred about equal. Your books is pretty much useless and could be relegated to the bottom of the heap.
19brightcopy
18> I've suggested it a couple of times. Doubtless others have, too. Here's mine:
http://www.librarything.com/topic/84824
http://www.librarything.com/topic/94451
http://www.librarything.com/topic/84824
http://www.librarything.com/topic/94451

