Catherine Shaw (1) (1961–)
Author of The Library Paradox
For other authors named Catherine Shaw, see the disambiguation page.
Series
Works by Catherine Shaw
Tagged
Common Knowledge
- Legal name
- Schneps, Leila
- Birthdate
- 1961-12-22
- Gender
- female
- Education
- Radcliffe College (B.A.|1983)
Université Paris-Sud XI-Orsay - Occupations
- mathematician
author
crime writer
translator - Organizations
- Centre national de la recherche scientifique
- Short biography
- Catherine Shaw is the pen name of Leila Schneps, born in Waltham, Massachusetts. She earned a B.A. in mathematics, German language and literature from Radcliffe College/Harvard University in 1983, then went to France for post-graduate studies. She completed a doctorat de troisième cycle in mathematics at Université Paris-Sud XI-Orsay in 1985 and earned a Ph.D. in mathematics in 1990. In 1991, she was awarded a tenured research position at CNRS, the French National Centre for Scientific Research, and is based at the Institut de Mathématiques de Jussieu of Pierre and Marie Curie University, where she specializes in number theory. During the late 1990s, she also had short-term visiting researcher assignments at Harvard University, Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study, and MSRI at Berkeley. In addition to her academic publications, including several textbooks on mathematics, she has written articles and a popular book on the use and abuse of mathematics in criminal proceedings, Math on Trial: How Numbers Get Used and Abused in the Courtroom, co-authored with her daughter Coralie Colmez, also a mathematician. She also has produced English-language translations of several French-language books and papers. Under the pseudonym Catherine Shaw, she writes mathematically-themed historical murder mysteries, beginning with The Three Body Problem (2004).
- Nationality
- USA
- Birthplace
- Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
- Places of residence
- Paris, France
- Associated Place (for map)
- USA
Members
Reviews
This is a mystery. And book number four in a series. I don't read mysteries, and I don't start in the middle of a series. But – dad gum – I enjoyed this!
Victorian England historical fiction, set in Cambridge, involving a missing Shakespearean actress, the Charles Darwin family, prostitution, social classes, scientific advances, boating, a bookstore, and a female detective. It was a good, fun, little mystery and I'll definitely look for the earlier books in this series.
Victorian England historical fiction, set in Cambridge, involving a missing Shakespearean actress, the Charles Darwin family, prostitution, social classes, scientific advances, boating, a bookstore, and a female detective. It was a good, fun, little mystery and I'll definitely look for the earlier books in this series.
On LibraryThing I wrote: 'A bluestocking Victorian wife and mother chafing gently under the social constraints of Cambridge is invited to investigate the suspicious death of a London academic. Leaving her children with relatives she comes to Kings College and mingles with academics and Jewry to solve an ingenious mystery in a Victorian London redolent with authenticity. With its clear style and rigourous fair play, this is a rewarding puzzle and and a satisfying resolution.'
As soon as the murder scene was described it was obvious what the solution was and made more obvious by the fact that it was resolutely not suggested as a possibility by any of the characters. The plot was slow moving and not enlivened by the detective's frequent moonings over the 'sweet little limbs' of her children, whom she pretty much abandons every time there is a case. I enjoyed the parts about research into Jewish history and blood liable but the audiobook seemed to go on forever and show more all of the characters were annoying and bits of the plot far-fetched and ridiculous. show less
What a muddle of a book! Inconsistencies, incongruities, improbabilities abound. Enormous leaps of logic made on suspicion alone, and what is with the possible love interest introduced in the last two chapters? Spoiler: Why does our scatterbrained detective not even speak with the villain until the very last pages of the book? Two stars only because I finished it anyway.
Awards
You May Also Like
Statistics
- Works
- 6
- Members
- 357
- Popularity
- #67,135
- Rating
- 3.2
- Reviews
- 11
- ISBNs
- 60
- Languages
- 2















