Picture of author.

Milton Friedman (1912–2006)

Author of Capitalism and Freedom

86+ Works 6,242 Members 68 Reviews 14 Favorited

About the Author

Milton Friedman (1912-2006), Nobel Prize winner for excellence in economics, was a senior research fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and the Paul Snowden Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus of Economics at the University of Chicago. His many published books include Essays show more in Positive Economics, Monetary Trends in the United States and the United Kingdom, and Milton Friedman on Economics, all published by the University of Chicago Press. show less
Image credit: Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize in economics and libertarian activist by http://www.freetochoosemedia.org/

Works by Milton Friedman

Capitalism and Freedom (1962) 2,448 copies, 30 reviews
Free to Choose: A Personal Statement (1980) 1,945 copies, 18 reviews
Why Government Is the Problem (1993) 128 copies, 3 reviews
Price Theory (1976) 100 copies, 1 review
Essays in Positive Economics (1953) 94 copies, 1 review
Two Lucky People: Memoirs (1998) 90 copies, 1 review
The Tyranny of the Status Quo (1984) 79 copies, 1 review
Monetary vs Fiscal Policy: A Dialogue (1969) 40 copies, 1 review
New Individualist Review (1981) 24 copies
Monetarist Economics (1991) 10 copies
Price theory, a provisional text (2011) 10 copies, 2 reviews
From Galbraith to economic freedom (1977) 7 copies, 2 reviews
The Corporation (2003) 4 copies
Friedman in China (1990) 4 copies
Kapitalizmi dhe liria 2 copies, 1 review

Associated Works

The Road to Serfdom (1944) — Introduction, some editions — 2,815 copies, 35 reviews
A Time for Truth (1978) — Preface, some editions — 163 copies, 1 review
Keeping the Tablets: Modern American Conservative Thought (1988) — Contributor — 59 copies
Essays on Hayek (1976) — Foreword — 50 copies
The Conservative Papers (1970) — Contributor — 11 copies
Theories of the Labor Movement (1987) — Contributor — 7 copies
BYU Studies - Vol. 16, No. 4 (Summer 1976) (1976) — Contributor — 5 copies
Playboy Magazine ~ February 1973 (Jeanette Larson) (1973) — Interview — 3 copies

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Canonical name
Friedman, Milton
Birthdate
1912-07-31
Date of death
2006-11-16
Burial location
Cremated and ashes scattered over San Francisco Bay.
Gender
male
Nationality
USA
Birthplace
New York, New York, USA
Place of death
San Francisco, California, USA
Cause of death
heart failure
Places of residence
Rahway, New Jersey, USA
Chicago, Illinois, USA
New York, New York, USA
San Francisco, California, USA
Education
Rahway High School, Rahway, New Jersey, USA (1928)
Rutgers University (B.A.|1932)
University of Chicago (M.A.|Economics|1933)
Columbia University (Ph.D.|Economics|1946)
Occupations
economist
professor
Relationships
Friedman, Rose (wife)
Organizations
University of Chicago
Hoover Institution
Awards and honors
Nobel Prize (Economic Sciences|1976)
Presidential Medal of Freedom (1988)
National Medal of Science (1988)
John Bates Clark Medal (1951)
Short biography
American economist and Nobel Prize Recipient. Born in New York City to Jewish parents who had immigrated from Hungary, he began developing his economic theories during the Great Depression. He received a Ph.D. from Columbia University in 1946, was Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago from 1946 to 1976, became a senior research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution in 1977, and influenced the economic policies of three presidents (Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan). Recognized for his work on macroeconomics, microeconomics, economic history, and statistics, he believed strongly in laissez-faire capitalism for a free market economy and in the principles of 18th century economist Adam Smith, consistently asserting that individual freedom should rule economic policy. His book, "Capitalism and Freedom" (1962) sought to minimize the role of government in a free market, thereby promoting political and social freedom. He won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1976 for his achievements in the fields of consumption analysis, monetary history and theory, and for his demonstration of the complexity of stabilization policy. He hosted a television series "Free to Choose" on PBS in early 1980 which became a widely-read book, co-authored with his wife, Rose Friedman. His more well known books were: "Price Theory" (1962 with Rose Friedman), "Capitalism and Freedom" (1962 with Anna J. Schwartz), "An Economist's Protest" (1972), and "There Is No Such Thing As a Free Lunch" (1975). In addition to authoring 32 books on economics, he also wrote a column for Newsweek magazine from 1966 to 1983 and was one of the few economists able to bridge the gap between academia and the public. He put his economic policies to the test by working with his former students and Chilean military dictator Augusto Pinochet. He died of heart failure in San Francisco, California.

Members

Reviews

This is a very well written, carefully considered and concise defense of competitive free market capitalism, and a well-supported argument for minimizing government involvement in the economy and the size and scope of government in the absence of a very compelling argument in support of that government activity. The first chapter is essentially a synopsis of Friedrich Hayek's The Road to Serfdom, arguing that economic liberty is inseparable from individual liberty; that allowing free individuals to pursue self-interest in a free market leads to more productivity, prosperity and creativity than is possible otherwise; and that central control stifles that fecundity along with individual freedoms. The next couple chapters deal with what I found to be Hayek's most significant omissions: delineation of the legitimate roles of the state and discussion of appropriate (and inappropriate) monetary policy and fiscal policy.

Friedman then discusses several important areas in which government involvement in the market has been both harmful in terms of misallocation of resources, creating disincentives and the like; and by having consequences that are the opposite of those purportedly intended. He's convinced, and convincing, that monetary policy since creation of the Federal Reserve, and the Fed itself, are net negatives. Various government sanctioned monopolies and similar arrangements are condemned, including professional licensure; minimum wage laws; labor unions; and not having stock dividends taxed as income of the stockholders, thereby encouraging reinvestment in the corporation, making it larger than otherwise while that capital is unavailable for and even diverted from new enterprises/competitors (sounds a bit like too big to fail; combined with his monetary arguments, the result is there. No doubt Friedman would say Dodd-Frank compounds the problem while expanding government bureaucracy, when changes in tax and monetary policy would help or solve the problem; if not adequately, it's probably a monopolistic problem that needs to be addressed as such. Several other topics and arguments in the book are highly relevant today). Other items pretty convincingly critiqued are government-run education, social security, the graduated tax with high nominal rates but riddled with loopholes, farm support, and public housing.

Simply listing these hardly makes Friedman's cases against them, which he does well. He notes a particular problem which may be more true today than when the book was published in 1962: the "tyranny of the status quo" - e.g. we tend to accept social security and the education system as they are since we're accustomed to them and haven't experienced alternatives. But there's no reason, for example, that a government requirement that we save for retirement involve a government run insurance program (which is really just a transfer program rather than a trust, and one that depends on demographics for its solvency). As with auto insurance, we can simply be required by government to have something provided by the market that meets minimum requirements (if the program is even legitimate, which Friedman doesn't believe).

The one serious flaw I find with Friedman's overall argument is that, like other strong defenders of laissez faire, he seems to treat the idea of free individuals making free exchanges in a competitive marketplace as a first principle. But he, like Hayek, notes that it's critical that the state establish the rule of law, and in particular ensure that contracts are enforced, for the market to work. That's necessary because people can't be trusted to honor their commitments. The point is that there's a broader and more fundamental ethical system prior to the free market principle. And besides our moral flaws, our knowledge is limited. And there are limits to the good that can be done through everyone pursuing self-interest. The market knows how to value the lumber in tropical rain forests, but it doesn't seem capable of adequately valuing unknown benefits that might come from new medicinal discoveries, much less does it seem able to even address the inherent value in biological diversity. The market can value cod, crabs and oysters as food commodities, but due to a lack of knowledge, or to concern only for present income regardless of whether productive fisheries will continue to exist in the future, capitalism clearly hasn't prevented us from decimating some "commercial fisheries" (otherwise known as components of ecosystems).

This critique could be taken into other areas, but that should suffice. I do generally agree with Friedman, and in fact I think we're getting into dangerous territory by moving in a direction opposite the one he would have us take. But I do think he has a blind spot (while admitting that, in the absence of widespread consensus regarding traditional Judeo-Christian ethics, that's a contentious area without a very clear foundation or way to establish widespread consensus).
… (more)
 
Flagged
garbagedump | 29 other reviews | Dec 9, 2022 |
When Milton Friedman’s "Capitalism and Freedom" came out in 1962, his was a rare voice defending classical liberal values and the free enterprise system. For years his ideas were unloved in ruling circles, as the leviathan unleashed by F.D.R.’s New Deal pressed its tentacles even further into the flesh of American society through Johnson’s Great Society and beyond.

But after nearly a generation wandering in the wilderness, Friedman lived to see the vindication of his ideas, as big government solutions repeatedly failed, and free market approaches out-performed.

My review continues: https://www.whynotlibertarianism.com/capitalism-and-freedom.html
… (more)
 
Flagged
Cicero | 29 other reviews | Jun 22, 2022 |
Cool short story about the "invisible hand". It gives a refreshing perspective on the million of goods and services generated by the modern economy every seconds - how it could be extremely difficult to plan and make a pencil from scratch without free competition, private property and market.

My question is, is free market the only place where innovation thrives? There are advanced inventions that are a direct product of central planning and governmental research funding - coming to my mind are Apollo 11, atomic bombs, even some argue, the many technology components behind the first iPhone ([b:Fifty Inventions That Shaped the Modern Economy|33358206|Fifty Inventions That Shaped the Modern Economy|Tim Harford|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1491703991l/33358206._SY75_.jpg|54098044] has a great chapter on this). Military research seems to be a great driving force in technology advancement

Perhaps the free market is the best way to productionalize and distribute progress?

… (more)
 
Flagged
footgun | 3 other reviews | Feb 28, 2022 |

Lists

Awards

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
86
Also by
12
Members
6,242
Popularity
#3,930
Rating
4.1
Reviews
68
ISBNs
221
Languages
19
Favorited
14

Charts & Graphs