Shakespeare's Bawdy

by Eric Partridge

On This Page

Description

This classic of Shakespeare scholarship begins with a masterly introductory essay analysing and exemplifying the various categories of sexual and non-sexual bawdy expressions and allusions in Shakespeare's plays and sonnets. The main body of the work consists of an alphabetical glossary of all words and phrases used in a sexual or scatological sense, with full explanations and cross-references.

Tags

Recommendations

Member Reviews

7 reviews
It's somewhat redundant now, in an era where any annotated Shakespeare volume worth the price comes with a completely smuttified glossary, but there was a time - within the lifetime of some people still living - when this stuff was regularly omitted from teaching at any level. (It's the principal reason, to this day, that "Julius Caesar" and "A Midsummer Night's Dream" top so many highschool curricula.)

So, top marks for Partridge for putting together a glossary that finds some remarkably obscure dirty words in Shakespeare. Love it.

The opening essay is more of a mixed bag, to be honest. One-third is great, just in justifying Shakespeare's use of smut (nowadays, as we know more about theatre production and can equate it with the 17th show more century, we need this less). One-third is really just a recap of the glossary, since clearly Partridge is feeling pretty defensive. The other third is... more pretentious. And unpleasant. It's Partridge's overly psychologically telling explanation of why Shakespeare was expressly heterosexual. Now, don't get me wrong, I believe Shakespeare was at most bisexual, and ultimately it doesn't matter. But Partridge - while certainly "tolerant" of the deviant homosexuals he sees everywhere around him - directly appeals to his heterosexual readers to show less bias and to appreciate that only a straight man would make so many vagina jokes while writing a play for a mainstream audience. Um, Eric? Half of my friends are homosexual writers and/or comedians, and very few of them are afraid to discuss the pudenda. At length. But, thanks for playing.

So, his contributions far outweigh his puzzling psychological tells, but this book is probably outdated nonetheless.
show less
A great resource! Shakespeare wrote for the people, and they were a rowdy bunch. His plays are filled with dirty kones, obscene remarks and more - you jsut have to understand the context. That's where this remarkable book comes in. Partridge explains the references, so the modern reader can understand and enjoy the raunchy humor.
loaned to Kit Palmer 10.19.09

Members

Recently Added By

Author Information

Picture of author.
81+ Works 3,600 Members

Some Editions

Wells, Stanley (Foreword)

Series

Belongs to Publisher Series

Common Knowledge

Canonical title*
Shakespeare's bawdy
Original publication date
1948
People/Characters
William Shakespeare; Oscar Wilde
*Some information comes from Common Knowledge in other languages. Click "Edit" for more information.

Classifications

Genres
Nonfiction, Poetry, Literature Studies and Criticism
DDC/MDS
822.33Literature & rhetoricEnglish & Old English literaturesBritish DramaShakespeareShakespeare, William 1564–1616
LCC
PR2892 .P27Language and LiteratureEnglishEnglish LiteratureEnglish renaissance (1500-1640)
BISAC

Statistics

Members
369
Popularity
84,694
Reviews
4
Rating
(3.95)
Languages
English, Finnish
Media
Paper, Ebook
ISBNs
8
ASINs
14