Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Scoop (original 1938; edition 1999)by Evelyn Waugh (Author)
Work InformationScoop by Evelyn Waugh (1938)
Books Read in 2021 (504) » 13 more 20th Century Literature (433) Books Read in 2017 (930) Books Read in 2022 (827) Books Read in 2023 (2,550) 1930s (167) Alphabetical Books (190) Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. Scoop (London, 1938) by Evelyn Waugh is a satire on journalism. It is based on Waugh's 1935 assignment to cover the conflict between Abyssinia and Italy while working as a war correspondent for the London Daily Mail in Abyssinia (now Ethiopia). Waugh acknowledged that he was not very good at covering wars, but he did keep a close eye on what his fellow reporters were doing. The outcome was a comedic and satirical novel that mocks the newspaper industry and the journalism profession with a playful yet decidedly deadly tone. The story centers upon a few humorous turns of events. Lord Copper, the conceited and uneducated proprietor of the Daily Beast, inadvertently dispatches William Boot, a naive nature columnist, to cover the conflict in the made-up nation of Ishmaelia in East Africa. At least geographically speaking, Ishmaelia and Abyssinia are identical. William learns a few fast lessons on the crafty methods used by journalists, who are constantly attempting to outsmart their peers and break a story. William returns to London as a well-known reporter after receiving many significant scoops on his own thanks to a string of fortunate events. However, all of it is meaningless to him, and he is glad to be going back to his remote and run-down country house, Boot Magna Hall, where his numerous eccentric relatives reside. Overall this is still an entertaining comedic read. I've been wanting to read this book for ages - Evelyn Waugh's famous satire on journalism. While still very enjoyable, its bite is now a lot less incisive than it might once have been. The plot is a rollicking good comedy of errors, displaying a lot of the fatigued disenchantment of mid-20th century Britain so evident in (particularly) comedies of that period. There are plenty of beautifully timed comic moments (particularly in the first half of the book), and grotesque characters. The casual racism and total disinterest in anyone below the very upper middle-classes is perhaps to be expected, but less to be celebrated. Well, there may be a case that this is just Waugh's misanthropy, rather than actual basic bigotry, but nonetheless renders the book rather two-dimensional (just like most of the foreign and working class characters). The depiction of the journlist's trade is more affectionate than would be expected these days - they are mostly feckless rather than ruthless and incompetent not outright dishonest. If they influence the news it is more accident than design. For me, Scoop is more interesting as a period piece than a vital piece of satire. no reviews | add a review
Belongs to Publisher SeriesIs contained inHas the adaptationIs replied to inHas as a student's study guideNotable Lists
Lord Copper, newspaper magnate and proprietor of the "Daily Beast, " has always prided himself on his intuitive flair for spotting ace reporters. That is not to say he has not made the odd blunder, however, and may in a moment of weakness make another. Acting on a dinner party tip from Mrs. Algernon Stitch, Lord Copper feels convinced that he has hit on just the chap to cover a promising war in the African Republic of Ishmaelia. So begins "Scoop, "Waugh's exuberant comedy of mistaken identity and brilliantly irreverent satire of the hectic pursuit of hot news. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)823.912Literature English English fiction Modern Period 1901-1999 1901-1945LC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
The treatment of journalists and their pay was an undercurrent of the book. The way in which news and information is found and spread provided the narrative. The book was nonetheless poorly written. As there were multiple perspectives, the transitions between them was poor which ironically helped create the theme of misinformation. ( )