Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... Elizabeth Wydeville: The Slandered Queen (2009)by Arlene Okerlund
None Loading...
Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. Although this is supposedly a biography, Okerlund spends most of her time gushing about Elizabeth’s brother or making wild assumptions about historical figures’ state of minds. I hate when authors pretend they knew the thoughts of people long dead, and Okerlund does it *a lot*. She’s also wildly defensive about the Wydevilles—she spends far more time dissecting the arguments of other historians than making her own case. The book also isn’t organized very well. I was glad to read a biography from someone on the other side of the Wars of the Roses (I’ve studied Margaret of Anjou and of course, Henry VII before), but I wish this had been better. Useful as being the first modern full-scale biography of Elizabeth Woodville (Wydeville) wife of King Edward IV of England, but distorted by a bias in her favor at least as strong as the bias against her in some other writers. It is probably fair to say that she and her kinfolk were no more greedy for profit and power than most of the their rivals, but it is hard to believe they were less so. Okerlund emphasizes Anthony Woodville's learning and piety and downplays the fact that his position in charge of Prince Edward (briefly Edward V) would have given him total control of the next king of England if Richard Duke of Gloucester (later RIchard III) had not intervened. This is not to defend Gloucester (who was also less noble than his partisans insist) but simply to say it was a power struggle with no saints on either side. The writer also has an irritating habit of referring to earls as "Earl Warwick" etc. instead of "the Earl of Warwick" also she transcribes "regina" as "regia" , Vitellius as Vitellis, and translates vicecomitis/vicomtes as 'viscounts" instead of "sheriffs." as it in fact would mean in that context. no reviews | add a review
Belongs to Publisher Series
Elizabeth Wydeville, Queen consort to Edward IV, has traditionally been portrayed as a scheming opportunist. But was she a cunning vixen or a tragic wife and mother? As this extraordinary biography shows, the first queen to bear the name Elizabeth lived a tragedy, love, and loss that no other queen has since endured. This shocking revelation about the survival of one woman through vilification and adversity shows Elizabeth as a beautiful and adored wife, distraught mother of the two lost Princes in the Tower, and an innocent queen slandered by politicians. No library descriptions found. |
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
Google Books — Loading... GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)942.044092History and Geography Europe England and Wales England Lancaster and York 1400-85 Edward IV 1461-83LC ClassificationRatingAverage:
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
As Queen, Elizabeth was able to fend off all the hostility, but things went sour when Edward died young. Their oldest son became Edward V, but he and his brother were both taken to the Tower under the “protection” of the Duke of Gloucester, who quickly decided that Edward IV’s marriage was invalid and as the King’s only surviving brother he was the rightful heir as Richard III. The two princes disappeared (to be found buried under a stairway in the 18th century - maybe; apparently there’s so many bodies buried in the Tower it’s hard to know who’s who). All of Elizabeth’s male relatives were killed off, including the erudite Anthony Wydville, author of the first English-language book printed in England. However, Elizabeth managed to get her eldest daughter (also named Elizabeth) married to Henry Tudor, who invaded England, killed Richard (well, not personally) and took the throne as Henry VII. See Shakespeare for details.
This book has the same problem as a lot of medieval biographies; there just isn’t that much information available. Thus, we read a lot about Elizabeth’s relatives, get long verbatim descriptions of contemporary accounts of her coronation and her attendance at the reburial of her father-in-law (Richard of York), and miscellaneous bits of her household accounts, but not very much about the lady herself. The author, Arlene Okerlund, is reduced to speculation - how Elizabeth must have felt when her two oldest sons were kidnaped and she was denounced as an adulteress by Richard III. Well, probably not good, but she didn’t keep a diary. Don’t get me wrong; it’s a pretty good book, well researched, and well written; it just would be more accurately titled “The Life and Times of Elizabeth Wydeville” or something similar. ( )