Author picture

T. M. Scanlon

Author of What We Owe to Each Other

15+ Works 829 Members 5 Reviews 2 Favorited

About the Author

T.M. Scanlon is Alford Professor of Natural Religion, Moral Philosophy, and Civil Polity at Harvard University.

Works by T. M. Scanlon

What We Owe to Each Other (1998) 446 copies, 1 review
Equality and Preferential Treatment (1977) — Editor — 42 copies, 1 review
Why Does Inequality Matter? (2018) 39 copies
The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion (1974) — Editor — 38 copies
War and Moral Responsibility (1974) — Editor — 27 copies, 1 review
Marx, Justice and History (1980) — Editor — 27 copies
International Ethics (1985) — Editor — 22 copies
Medicine and Moral Philosophy (1982) — Editor — 15 copies, 1 review
Las Dimensiones Morales (2013) 2 copies

Associated Works

Tagged

Common Knowledge

Members

Reviews

5 reviews
A relationship [...] is a matter not only of what one does, or intends to do, but also of the reasons for which one does these things.

Scanlon gives a very persuasive account of permissibility and meanings of actions. His account of blameworthiness and blame are also compelling, but some of the details seem to me a little dubious. Specifically, I am skeptical that people can be blamed for things that are not under their control. That being said, Scanlon's arguments are the most convincing show more that I have read that show how that it might be possible to do so. All in all, I highly recommend this book for anyone interested in the diverse character of our moral experience, specifically when it comes to our moral attitudes and blaming practices. show less
½
While it is up to us to judge whether appropriate reasons for [judgement-sensitive attitudes] are or are not present, it is not generally within our power to make it the case that these reasons are or are not there; this depends on facts outside us.

While I found "Part I: Reasons and Values" much more interesting than the heart of the contractualist theory of right and wrong in Part II, What We Owe to Each Other is undeniably an important piece of moral philosophy. Scanlon is deliberate and show more clear in his prose, though occasionally overwrought.

For example, the definition of his theory is defined in the negative: "An act is wrong if its performance under the circumstances would be disallowed by any set of principles for the general regulation of behavior that no one could reasonably reject as a basis for informed, unforced, general agreement." If you followed that on the first read, then you'll have no problem with the rest of the book. If you're like me and have trouble following double and triple negations, then be prepared to re-read sections. That being said, the book is crucial for anyone interested in contemporary ethical theory.
show less
45 years ago this was widely-assigned reading (during the conflict in Southeast Asia)

Lists

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Statistics

Works
15
Also by
2
Members
829
Popularity
#30,791
Rating
3.9
Reviews
5
ISBNs
53
Languages
3
Favorited
2

Charts & Graphs