|
Loading... Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies (1997)by Jared Diamond
Favourite Books (58) » 14 more Unread books (20) Top Five Books of 2013 (492) Books Read in 2013 (44) Big tags (1) Books tagged favorites (191)
No current Talk conversations about this book.  Colin5038 | Feb 4, 2014 |  Take after finishing - good information well documented. An antidote to racialist thought. But very hard to get through. (  ) dcornwall | Jan 11, 2014 | Diamond explicates his premise that society’s development in the world followed a single pattern dependent upon factors of geography, geology, and the availability of natural resources that could be domesticated and more easily utilized, leading to sedentary populations overtaking hunter-gatherer ones. The key to advancement is the accumulation of food stores beyond subsistence levels within a tribe/clan, achieved by domesticating cereals (largely) and beasts suitable for burden and transportation. From that state, populations rapidly expand; bureaucracy, specialists, and a standing military arise; writing and technology develop. Concomitantly, with increasing population density and the proximity of domesticated animals, germs that elicit epidemic diseases proliferate. The end result is that technology produces guns, high population densities produce germs capable of overwhelming unexposed societies, and contending population centers produce innovative technology (steel). The civilization that stays ahead in those three areas predominate. Thus advancement has nothing to do with race, only abundance, adaptability, and timing. Diamond quickly establishes a formula to develop his thesis that rapidly becomes repetitive and predictable. The book could have been half its length by simply applying his reasoning formula to each title topic once, offering archaeological and linguistic evidence to support examples from history that illustrate each, bring up some troubling apparent exceptions and dismiss those, and wind up (as he does in the book) with “where do we go from here” speculation. Why GGS won a Pulitzer, I don’t know. Personal, and admittedly insightful, anecdotes about New Guineans are not enough to make the book prize-worthy. There is no artistry in the writing and the content is largely common sense connections that I’m sure I’m not the only one who had made already. (  ) Limelite | Oct 7, 2013 | An epic piece of multi-disciplinary research powerful enough to make you reconsider everything you thought you knew about the human race. (  ) dele2451 | Oct 6, 2013 | Thank you for communicating relations between people and technology. ( ) Michael.Bradham | Sep 2, 2013 |
 In ''Guns, Germs, and Steel,'' an ambitious, highly important book, Jared Diamond asks: How did Pizarro come to be at Cajamarca capturing Atahualpa, instead of Atahualpa in Madrid capturing King Charles I? Why, indeed, did Europeans (and especially western Europeans) and Asians always triumph in their historical conquests of other populations? Why weren't Native Americans, Africans and aboriginal Australians instead the ones who enslaved or exterminated the Europeans?  Jared Diamond has written a book of remarkable scope: a history of the world in less than 500 pages which succeeds admirably, where so many others have failed, in analysing some of the basic workings of cultural process. . . It is willing to simplify and to generalize; and it does reach conclusions, about ultimate as well as proximate causes, that carry great conviction, and that have rarely, perhaps never, been stated so coherently or effectively before. For that reason, and with few reservations, this book may be welcomed as one of the most important and readable works on the human past published in recent years. Has the adaptationIs abridged inHas as a studyHas as a commentary on the text
References to this work on external resources.
|
 Google Books — Loading...
Popular coversRatingAverage: (4.14)
 Audible.comThree editions of this book were published by Audible.com.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
11
Wikipedia in English (74)
4
5/5 stars (